Dorje Shugden: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Hwangboy (bicara | kontrib)
←Membuat halaman berisi 'thumb|Patung Dorje Shugden '''Dorje Shugden''' ({{lang-bo|རྡོ་རྗེ་ཤུགས་ལྡན་}}, Wylie: ''rdo rje shugs ldan'', {{IPA-bo|toːtɕe ɕuktɛ̃}}), juga dikenal sebagai '''Dolgyal''' dan '''Gyalchen Shugden''', adalah entitas yang terkait dengan aliran Gelug, aliran terbaru dari Buddhisme Tibet.<ref>{{cite book |last=Matthews |first=Carol S. |year=...'
 
k Pranala luar: pembersihan kosmetika dasar
 
(3 revisi perantara oleh 2 pengguna tidak ditampilkan)
Baris 1:
[[Berkas:Ballard Kadampa Buddhist Temple interior 02.jpg|thumb|Patung Dorje Shugden]]
'''Dorje Shugden''' ({{lang-bo|རྡོ་རྗེ་ཤུགས་ལྡན་}}, [[Alih aksara Wylie|Wylie]]: ''rdo rje shugs ldan'', {{IPA-bo|toːtɕe ɕuktɛ̃}}), juga dikenal sebagai '''Dolgyal''' dan '''Gyalchen Shugden''', adalah entitas yang terkait dengan aliran [[Gelug]], aliran terbaru dari [[Buddhisme Tibet]].<ref>{{cite book |last=Matthews |first=Carol S. |year=2005 |title=New Religions |chapter=New Kadampa Tradition |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=stQQJlV9FT8C&pg=PA128 |location=[[Philadelphia]] |publisher=[[Chelsea House Publishers]] |series=Religions of the World |pages=128-143 |isbn=9780791080962 |lccn=2004024514}}</ref> Dorje Shugden secara beragam dipandang sebagai [[Roh gyalpoGyalpo|gyalpo]] yang hancur, pelindung duniawi kecil, pelindung duniawi utama, pelindung utama yang [[Buddhabhāva|tercerahkan]] yang penampilan luarnya seperti gyalpo, atau sebagai pelindung utama tercerahkan yang penampilan luarnya tercerahkan.
 
==Bacaan lebih lanjut==
Baris 103:
|jstor=20066065 }}
 
*{{cite book
|last=Kay
|first=David N.
|title=Tibetan and Zen Buddhism in Britain: Transplantation, development and adaptation
|url=http://elibrary.ibc.ac.th/files/private/Tibetan%20and%20Zen%20Buddhism%20in%20Britain%20Transplantation,%20Development%20and%20Adaptation.pdf
|pages=44–52
|year=2004
|publisher=Routledge Curzon
|place=London
|isbn=0-415-29765-6
|access-date=2022-01-11
}}
|archive-date=2017-07-01
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170701131919/http://elibrary.ibc.ac.th/files/private/Tibetan%20and%20Zen%20Buddhism%20in%20Britain%20Transplantation,%20Development%20and%20Adaptation.pdf
|dead-url=yes
}}
 
* {{cite journal
Baris 150 ⟶ 156:
 
* {{cite thesis
|type = MA
|first = Lindsay G.
|last = McCune
|title = Tales of Intrigue from Tibet's Holy City: The historical underpinnings of a modern Buddhist crisis
|institution = Florida State University, College of Arts and Sciences
|year = 2007
|url = http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-04092007-003235/unrestricted/lgm_thesis.pdf
|access-date = 27 April 2014
|url-status = dead
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120214190452/http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-04092007-003235/unrestricted/lgm_thesis.pdf
|archive-date = 14 February 2012
}} {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120214190452/http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-04092007-003235/unrestricted/lgm_thesis.pdf |date=2012-02-14 }}
}}
 
*{{cite web
Baris 280 ⟶ 286:
{{Commonscat}}
*{{cite journal |last=Richard |first=Frédéric |date=2020 |title=Shugs ldan and the Dalai Lama: A Conflict of Political Legitimation Processes? |url=http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_55_19.pdf |journal=Revue d'Études Tibétaines |volume= |issue=55 |pages=440–461 |doi= |access-date=2021-02-08}}
 
*{{cite journal |url=http://dalailama.com/messages/dolgyal-shugden/ganden-tripa/the-shugden-affair-i |title=The Shuk-Den Affair: Origins of a Controversy |last1=Dreyfus |first1=Georges |year=1998 |journal=Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies |volume=21 |issue=2 |date=Fall 1998 |pages=227–270 |access-date=December 4, 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130116143448/http://dalailama.com/messages/dolgyal-shugden/ganden-tripa/the-shugden-affair-i |archive-date=January 16, 2013 }}
*{{cite web |url=http://info-buddhism.com/dorje_shugden_controversy_von_Brueck.html |title=Canonicity and Divine Interference: The Tulkus and the Shugden-Controversy |last1=von Brück |first1=Michael |year=2001 |website=Info Buddhism |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=December 4, 2013}}