WTFPL: Perbedaan antara revisi

<sourcesyntaxhighlight lang="text">

<sourcesyntaxhighlight lang="text">

Beberapa penulis perangkat lunak mengatakan bahwa lisensinya tidak terlalu serius;<ref>{{cite web|type=Blog|url=https://mackuba.eu/2011/01/15/on-open-source-licensing/|title=On Open Source licensing|first=Kuba|last=Suder|quote=There are at least two not very serious licenses which have essentially the same meaning as public domain. I'm talking about the Beerware license and WTFPL ('Do What The Fuck You Want To' license). I really like these because they pretty well represent my opinion about the legalese bullshit that most licenses are so full of.|date=2011-01-15|website=Apples & Rubies}}</ref> hal [[Garpu (pengembangan perangkat lunak)|penggarpuan]] repositori telah mencoba untuk mengatasi ambiguitas kata dan masalah pertanggungjawaban.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://theiostream.tumblr.com/post/19850980363/introducing-wtfpl-v3|title=Introducing WTFPL v3|date=2012-03-24|author=theiostream|publisher=[[tumblr]]|type=Blog|accessdate=2016-07-19|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140705065219/http://theiostream.tumblr.com/post/19850980363/introducing-wtfpl-v3 |archivedate=July 5, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://tldrlegal.com/license/do-what-the-fuck-you-want-to-but-it's%27s-not-my-fault-public-license-v1-(wtfnmfpl%28wtfnmfpl-1.0)%29|title=Do What The Fuck You Want To But It's Not My Fault Public License v1 (WTFNMFPL-1.0)|website=tl;drLegal|author=Ben McGinnes|date=2013-10-01|accessdate=2016-07-19|quote=… with a [[Cover your ass|CYA]] clause ….|archive-date=2016-04-23|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160423225128/https://tldrlegal.com/license/do-what-the-fuck-you-want-to-but-it%27s-not-my-fault-public-license-v1-%28wtfnmfpl-1.0%29|dead-url=yes}}</ref> Presiden pendiri OSI, Eric S. Raymond menafsirkan lisensi WTFPL sebagai sindiran tertulis terhadap pembatasan GPL dan lisensi perangkat lunak lainnya.<ref>{{cite web|type=Blog|url=http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2000 |title=Software licenses as conversation |quote=It’s even clearer that the Do What the Fuck You Want To Public License is a satire. The author is one of those who thinks the Free Software Foundation has traduced the word 'free' by hedging the GNU General Public License about with restrictions and boobytraps in the name of 'freedom' – and he’s got an issue or two with BSD as well. He is poking fun at both camps, not gently at all. His page about the WTFPL is funny-because-it’s-true hilarious, and I admit that I feel a sneaking temptation to start using it myself.|author=Eric S. Raymond|authorlink=Eric S. Raymond |date=2010-05-19 |publisher=esr.iblio.org |accessdate=2016-07-19 }}</ref> Penulis WTFPL versi 2, Sam Hocevar, kemudian mengonfirmasi bahwa WTFPL adalah parodi dari GPL.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/149050/should-i-change-the-name-of-the-wtfpl#comment617907_161949|author=Sam Hocevar|authorlink=Sam Hocevar|quote=The WTFPL is a parody of the GPL, which has a similar copyright header and list of permissions to modify (i.e. none), see for instance gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html. The purpose of the WTFPL wording is to give more freedom than the GPL does.|date=2015-09-21|website=Programmers Stack Exchange|title=Should I change the name of the WTFPL?|type=User comment|accessdate=2016-07-19}}</ref> Aktivis [[gerakan budaya bebas|budaya bebas]], Nina Paley, mengatakan jika dia menganggap WTFPL sebagai lisensi bebas untuk karya budayawi.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://questioncopyright.org/how_to_free_your_work|title=How To Free Your Work|website=QuestionCopyright.org|author=Nina Paley|authorlink=Nina Paley|date=2011-06-24|accessdate=2016-07-19}}</ref>