Fork (pengembangan perangkat lunak): Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
InternetArchiveBot (bicara | kontrib)
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
 
(1 revisi perantara oleh pengguna yang sama tidak ditampilkan)
Baris 26:
{{Reflist|30em
|refs=
<ref name="Skisma">"Skisma", serta konotasinya, merupakan penggunaan yang biasa, ''contoh'' [http://www.jwz.org/doc/lemacs.html "the Lemacs/FSFmacs schism"] {{webarchiveWebarchive|url=https://wwwweb.webcitationarchive.org/5lyRUxhVp?url=web/20091130093142/http://www.jwz.org/doc/lemacs.html |date=12 December 2009-11-30 }} ([[Jamie Zawinski]], 2000), [https://lwn.net/Articles/419822/ "Behind the KOffice split"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130706094238/http://lwn.net/Articles/419822/ |date=6 July 2013 }} (Joe Brockmeier, ''Linux Weekly News'', 2010-12-14), [http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Copyright-assignment-Once-bitten-twice-shy-1049631.html "Copyright assignment - once bitten, twice shy"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120330153250/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Copyright-assignment-Once-bitten-twice-shy-1049631.html |date=30 March 2012 }} (Richard Hillesley, ''H-Online'', 2010-08-06), [http://dashes.com/anil/2010/09/forking-is-a-feature.html "Forking is a feature"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120229032536/http://dashes.com/anil/2010/09/forking-is-a-feature.html |date=29 February 2012 }} ([[Anil Dash]], 2010-09-10), [http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000101 "The Great Software Schism"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120106065841/http://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1000101 |date=6 January 2012 }} ([[Glyn Moody]], ''Linux Journal'', 2006-09-28), [http://mako.cc/writing/to_fork_or_not_to_fork.html "To Fork Or Not To Fork: Lessons From Ubuntu and Debian"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120226160810/http://mako.cc/writing/to_fork_or_not_to_fork.html |date=26 February 2012 }} ([[Benjamin Mako Hill]], 2005).</ref>
<ref name="etym">[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fork Entry 'fork' in Online Etymology Dictionary] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120525165727/http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fork |date=25 May 2012 }}</ref>
<ref name="forkSystemCall">"The term fork is derived from the POSIX standard for operating systems: the system call used so that a process generates a copy of itself is called fork()." {{cite conference|url=http://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/paper_0.pdf|title=A Comprehensive Study of Software Forks: Dates, Reasons and Outcomes|first1=Gregorio|last1=Robles|first2=Jesús M.|last2=González-Barahona|conference=OSS 2012 The Eighth International Conference on Open Source Systems|year=2012|accessdate=20 Oct 2012|url-status=live|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131202221721/http://flosshub.org/sites/flosshub.org/files/paper_0.pdf|archivedate=2 December 2013|df=dmy-all|doi=10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_1}}</ref>
Baris 37:
 
== Pranala luar ==
* [http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/RightToFork Right to Fork] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150424032432/http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/RightToFork |date=2015-04-24 }} di [[Meatball Wiki]]
* Sebuah PhD mengamati proses fork: [http://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/153135 (Nyman, 2015)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230716095029/https://helda.helsinki.fi/handle/10138/153135 |date=2023-07-16 }} "Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software - An examination of code forking, its effect on open source software, and how it is viewed and practiced by developers"
 
{{FOSS}}