Pembicaraan:Myanmar: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Myanmar atau Burma? |
Notification of altered sources needing review) #IABot (v2.0.9.5 |
||
| (11 revisi perantara oleh 9 pengguna tidak ditampilkan) | |||
Baris 1:
== Myanmar atau Burma? ==
disadur dari Jawapos,
Beberapa negara menyebut Myanmar tetap dengan nama lamanya: Burma. Penggunaan dua nama berbeda untuk satu wilayah negara yang sama itu memang masih diperdebatkan negara-negara lain di dunia.
Baris 20:
Selain itu, Myanmar lebih banyak digunakan dalam bahasa tulis. Sebaliknya, Burma lebih pada bahasa lisan. Namun, Houtman tidak mengelak bahwa penggunaan kata Myanmar lebih bertendensi politis.
Ahli bahasa Universitas Western England Richard Coates menjelaskan bahwa junta militer lebih menyukai kata Myanmar untuk menghapus sejarah kolonialisme di masa lalu. "Sementara kalangan oposisi lebih suka kata Burma sampai mereka mendapatkan pemerintahan yang dianggap lebih memiliki legitimasi daripada junta militer yang masih berkuasa saat ini," jelasnya. (bbc/*)
:Jadi, kita mendukung junta militer dong? [[Pengguna:Bennylin|bennylin]] 12:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Memilih "Myanmar" sebagai judul bukan berarti mendukung pemerintah junta militernya, kebijakan penamaan artikel di Wikipedia adalah menggunakan nama yang populer bukan nama resmi. [[User:Borgx|<font face="Copperplate Gothic Bold" color="#1F85FF">borgx</font>]]<sup>([[User_talk:Borgx|<font color="#003366">kirim pesan</font>]])</sup> 03:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC){{ProyekWiki Geografi|class=stub|importance=}}
== External links found that need fixing (Oktober 2023) ==
Hello fellow editors,
I have found one or more external links on [[Myanmar]] that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:
*http://www.adb.org/Documents/Fact_Sheets/MYA.pdf is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*https://www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/world-report-2012-burma is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*https://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/11/us-myanmar-violence-idUSBRE85A01C20120611 is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*http://www.mmtimes.com/index.php/special-features/153-sanctions-to-sucess/3187-burma-or-myanmar-will-the-us-make-the-switch.html is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
*http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3578993.stm is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20080408162817/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3578993.stm to the original URL.
When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit [[:m:InternetArchiveBot/FAQ|this simple FaQ]] for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.
This notice will only be made once for these URLs.
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:Courier New">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[:en:User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Melaporkan kesalahan]])</span> 9 Oktober 2023 03.34 (UTC)
| |||