Wikipedia:Pemenggalan: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Reno-Sifana (bicara | kontrib) k Menambah templat [[{{Terjemahan buruk}}]] |
|||
| (2 revisi perantara oleh satu pengguna lainnya tidak ditampilkan) | |||
Baris 57:
Jika tidak yakin, maka gunakan sebuah [[#Templat|templat]], dan mulai sebuah diskusi di halaman pembicaraan artikel tersebut.
== Prosedur ==
{{shortcut|WP:PROSEDURPENGGAL}}
{{Terjemahan buruk}}
'''Catatan:''' For disambiguation pages, use {{tl|Split dab}} instead of {{tl|split}}. If section to be split out is known, use {{tl|split section}}.
'''If an article meets the criteria for splitting and no discussion is required, editors can [[WP:Be bold|be bold]] and carry out the split.''' If unsure, or with high-profile or sensitive articles, start a "Split" discussion on the article talk page, and consider informing any associated WikiProject(s). Additionally, adding one of the [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Splitting| splitting templates]] will display a notice on the article and list it at [[:Category:Articles to be split]]. This will help bring it to the attention of editors who may assist in establishing consensus, in deciding if a split is appropriate, or in carrying out the split. Templates used without an accompanying rationale, and where there is no obvious reason for the split request, may be removed at any time.
'''Note:''' ''To conform with [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing requirements]], which require that all content contributors receive attribution, the page receiving the split material must have an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] noting "split content from <nowiki>[[article name]]</nowiki>". ('''Do not omit this step or omit the page name'''.) A note should also be made in the edit summary of the source article, "split content to <nowiki>[[article name]]</nowiki>". The {{tl|Copied}} template can also be placed on the talk page of both articles. For further information, refer to the main [[WP:Copying within Wikipedia|Copying within Wikipedia]] guideline.''
==={{anchor|1}}Step 1: Create a discussion===
''Skip to [[#5|step 5]] if making a '''bold''' split.''
Create a discussion on the talkpage of the page that content is to be split from. Include what sections are to be split and what the new page name should be. Example:
<syntaxhighlight lang="moin">
== Splitting proposal ==
I propose that sections ''[[sections]]'' be split into a separate page called ''[[new page name]]''. The content of the current page seems off-topic and these sections are large enough to make their own page. ~~~~
</syntaxhighlight>
''Notify involved users (optional):'' To generate a discussion and to notify people who know a lot about the topic, it is recommended to contact involved users. These users can be: frequent contributors, the creator of the page or users who have a lot of posts on the talk page. You can notify them by <code><nowiki>{{ping |''USER1''|''USER2''|...}}</nowiki></code> or by using a notice for their talk page <code><nowiki>{{Subst:Splitnote | ''ARTICLE NAME'' | ''NEW ARTICLE'' | ''TALK PAGE''}}</nowiki></code>.
[[WP:NOCONSENSUS|Failure to reach a consensus]], whether the result of a split discussion or a bold split that was contested, usually results in the article remaining whole. A contested bold split may be reverted; however it is not always appropriate to redirect the new article to the old as the new article may stand on its own, even if the main article that it came from is not split.
==={{anchor|2}}Step 2: Add notice===
Use {{tlx|split}} to notify users of the proposed split. On the article (not the talkpage) add <code><nowiki>{{split|'''Article 1'''|date=</nowiki>{{#time:F Y}}}}</code> or <code><nowiki>{{split|'''Article 1'''|'''Article 2'''|...|date=</nowiki>{{#time:F Y}}}}</code>. This template adds a box to notify users about the split. If the new page name is unknown, use <code><nowiki>{{split}}</nowiki></code> by itself with no parameters.
==={{anchor|3}}Step 3: Discuss===
In many cases, a hybrid discussion/straw poll is used, but remember that [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion|''polling'' is not a substitute for ''discussion'']]. Example formatting:
<syntaxhighlight lang="moin">
* '''Support''' – <insert reason for supporting split here> ~~~~
* '''Oppose''' – <insert reason for opposing split here> ~~~~
</syntaxhighlight>
==={{anchor|4}}Step 4: Close the discussion and determine the consensus===
Close the discussion and determine the consensus by using the following:
<syntaxhighlight lang="moin">
== Split proposal ==
{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was to ... ~~~~}}
<Start of discussion>
.
.
.
<End of discussion>
{{Discussion bottom}}
</syntaxhighlight>
==={{anchor|5}}Step 5: Perform the splitting===
[[#WP:PROPERSPLIT|See below]]. This is the most important step!
==={{anchor|6}}Step 6: Clean up===
If material is split from an article, consider whether a [[Wikipedia:Summary style|summary section]] should be created, and whether a {{tl|Main}} template should be placed at the top of the section to link to the new page. In general, if the split is due to [[WP:SIZESPLIT|size]], then a summary section is required; if the split is due to [[WP:CONSPLIT|content]] (or [[WP:Out of scope|scope]]), then a summary section is unlikely to be required. On the talk page of the new and old articles, include the template {{tl|Copied}}.
== Lihat pula ==
* [[Wikipedia:Gaya ringkasan]] - pakai ini
* [[Bantuan:Penggabungan dan pemindahan]] - atau ini
* [[Wikipedia:Percabangan isi]] - asal bukan ini
| |||