Hubungan India dengan Mesopotamia: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
←Membuat halaman berisi '{{Short description|none}} {{multiple image|perrow=2|total_width=300|caption_align=center | align = right | direction =vertical | header=India–Mesopotamia relations | image1 = Mesopotamia-Indus.jpg | caption1 = Rute perdagangan antara Mesopotamia dan India akan jauh lebih pendek karena permukaan air laut yang lebih rendah pada milenium ke-3 SM.<ref name="JR12"/> | image2 = Sharkalisharri seal.jpg | caption2 = Kesan segel silinder Kekaisaran Akkadia,...'
Tag: halaman dengan galat kutipan kemungkinan perlu dirapikan tanpa kategori [ * ] VisualEditor-alih
 
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan
 
(2 revisi perantara oleh pengguna yang sama tidak ditampilkan)
Baris 5:
| header=India–Mesopotamia relations
| image1 = Mesopotamia-Indus.jpg
| caption1 = Rute perdagangan antara Mesopotamia dan India akan jauh lebih pendek karena permukaan air laut yang lebih rendah pada milenium ke-3 SM.<ref name="JR12"/>
| image2 = Sharkalisharri seal.jpg
| caption2 = Kesan segel silinder [[Kekaisaran Akkadia]], dengan label: “Sang Ilahi [[Sharkalisharri]] Pangeran Akkad, Ibni-Sharrum sang Juru Tulis pelayannya”. Kerbau bertanduk panjang [[Kerbau India]] yang digambarkan dalam segel tersebut diperkirakan berasal dari [[Lembah Indus]], dan menjadi bukti adanya pertukaran dengan Meluhha, [[Peradaban Lembah Indus]]. Sekitar tahun 2217-2193 Sebelum Masehi. [[Museum Louvre]], referensi AO 22303.<ref name="Cylinder Seal of Ibni-Sharrum">{{cite web |title=Cylinder Seal of Ibni-Sharrum |url=https://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/cylinder-seal-ibni-sharrum |website=Louvre Museum |access-date=2019-03-26 |archive-date=2023-02-09 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230209060130/https://www.louvre.fr/en/oeuvre-notices/cylinder-seal-ibni-sharrum |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Site officiel du musée du Louvre |url=http://cartelfr.louvre.fr/cartelfr/visite?srv=car_not_frame&idNotice=12067 |website=cartelfr.louvre.fr}}</ref><ref name="Walter de Gruyter">{{cite book |last1=Brown |first1=Brian A. |last2=Feldman |first2=Marian H. |title=Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art |date=2013 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=9781614510352 |page=187 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=F4DoBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA187 |language=en}}</ref><ref name="The Indus: Lost Civilizations">{{cite book |last1=Robinson |first1=Andrew |title=The Indus: Lost Civilizations |date=2015 |publisher=Reaktion Books |isbn=9781780235417 |page=100 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SzS6CwAAQBAJ&pg=PA100 |language=en}}</ref>
Baris 32:
Asal usul pertanian Asia Selatan dari Timur Dekat sudah diterima secara umum, dan telah menjadi “dogma arkeologi virtual selama beberapa dekade”.<ref>"It has been virtual archaeological dogma for decades that Braidwood's constellation of potentially domesticable plants... were first domesticated in the Near East... early in the Holocene (c. 8,000 to 10,000 years ago). [...] The usual story is that domestic plants and animals, and the techniques of food production, then somehow 'diffused' to other parts of the Old World, including South Asia." in {{cite book |last1=Possehl |first1=Gregory L. |title=The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective |date=2002 |publisher=Rowman Altamira |isbn=978-0-7591-0172-2 |page=24 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pmAuAsi4ePIC&pg=PA24 |language=en}}</ref> Namun, [[Gregory Possehl]] berpendapat untuk model yang lebih bernuansa, di mana domestikasi awal spesies tanaman dan hewan mungkin terjadi di wilayah yang luas dari Mediterania ke [[Indus]], di mana teknologi dan ide baru beredar dengan cepat dan dibagikan secara luas.<ref name="GLP23">{{cite book |last1=Possehl |first1=Gregory L. |title=The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective |date=2002 |publisher=Rowman Altamira |isbn=978-0-7591-0172-2 |pages=23–28 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pmAuAsi4ePIC&pg=PA23 |language=en}}</ref> Saat ini, keberatan utama terhadap model ini terletak pada fakta bahwa [[gandum Einkorn|gandum liar]] tidak pernah ditemukan di Asia Selatan, menunjukkan bahwa gandum pertama kali didomestikasi di Timur Dekat dari spesies liar domestik yang terkenal dan kemudian dibawa ke Asia Selatan, atau bahwa gandum liar pernah ada di masa lalu di Asia Selatan tetapi entah bagaimana punah tanpa meninggalkan jejak.<ref name="GLP23"/>
 
[[Jean-François Jarrige]] berpendapat bahwa Mehrgarh berasal dari tempat yang berbeda. Jarrige mencatat “asumsi bahwa ekonomi pertanian diperkenalkan secara penuh dari Timur Dekat ke Asia Selatan”,<ref name="Jarrige">Jean-Francois Jarrige [http://www.archaeology.up.nic.in/doc/mn_jfj.pdf ''Mehrgarh Neolithic''] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303221610/http://archaeology.up.nic.in/doc/mn_jfj.pdf |date=3 March 2016 }}, Paper presented in the International Seminar on the "First Farmers in Global Perspective", Lucknow, India, 18–20 January 2006</ref><!--**START OF NOTE**-->{{efn|name="Near East"|According to Gangal et al. (2014), there is strong archeological and geographical evidence that neolithic farming spread from the Near East into north-west India.{{sfn|Gangal|Sarson|Shukurov|2014}}{{sfn|Singh|2016}} Gangal et al. (2014):{{sfn|Gangal|Sarson|Shukurov|2014}} "There are several lines of evidence that support the idea of connection between the Neolithic in the Near East and in the Indian subcontinent. The prehistoric site of Mehrgarh in Baluchistan (modern Pakistan) is the earliest Neolithic site in the north-west Indian subcontinent, dated as early as 8500 BCE.[18]<ref>Possehl GL (1999) Indus Age: The Beginnings. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press.</ref>{{pb}}Neolithic domesticated crops in Mehrgarh include more than 90% barley and a small amount of wheat. There is good evidence for the local domestication of barley and the zebu cattle at Mehrgarh [19],<ref name="Jarrige JF 2008">Jarrige JF (2008) Mehrgarh Neolithic. Pragdhara 18: 136–154</ref> [20],<ref>Costantini L (2008) The first farmers in Western Pakistan: the evidence of the Neolithic agropastoral settlement of Mehrgarh. Pragdhara 18: 167–178</ref> but the wheat varieties are suggested to be of Near-Eastern origin, as the modern distribution of wild varieties of wheat is limited to Northern Levant and Southern Turkey [21].<ref>Fuller DQ (2006) Agricultural origins and frontiers in South Asia: a working synthesis. J World Prehistory 20: 1–86</ref> A detailed satellite map study of a few archaeological sites in the Baluchistan and Khybar Pakhtunkhwa regions also suggests similarities in early phases of farming with sites in Western Asia [22].<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Petrie | first1 = CA | last2 = Thomas | first2 = KD | year = 2012 | title = The topographic and environmental context of the earliest village sites in western South Asia | journal = Antiquity | volume = 86 | issue = 334| pages = 1055–1067 | doi=10.1017/s0003598x00048249| s2cid = 131732322 }}</ref> Pottery prepared by sequential slab construction, circular fire pits filled with burnt pebbles, and large granaries are common to both Mehrgarh and many Mesopotamian sites [23].<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Goring-Morris | first1 = AN | last2 = Belfer-Cohen | first2 = A | year = 2011 | title = Neolithization processes in the Levant: the outer envelope | journal = Curr Anthropol | volume = 52 | pages = S195–S208 | doi=10.1086/658860| s2cid = 142928528 }}</ref> The postures of the skeletal remains in graves at Mehrgarh bear strong resemblance to those at [[Ali Kosh]] in the Zagros Mountains of southern Iran [19].<ref name="Jarrige JF 2008">Jarrige JF (2008) Mehrgarh Neolithic. Pragdhara 18: 136–154</ref> Clay figurines found in Mehrgarh resemble those discovered at [[Teppe Zagheh]] on the Qazvin plain south of the Elburz range in Iran (the 7th millennium BCE) and [[Jeitun]] in Turkmenistan (the 6th millennium BCE) [24].<ref>Jarrige C (2008) The figurines of the first farmers at Mehrgarh and their offshoots. Pragdhara 18: 155–166</ref> Strong arguments have been made for the Near-Eastern origin of some domesticated plants and herd animals at Jeitun in Turkmenistan (pp. 225–227 in [25]).<ref name="Harris DR 2010">Harris DR (2010) Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia: An Environmental-Archaeological Study. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press.</ref>{{pb}}The Near East is separated from the Indus Valley by the arid plateaus, ridges and deserts of Iran and Afghanistan, where rainfall agriculture is possible only in the foothills and cul-de-sac valleys [26].<ref name="Hiebert FT 2002">Hiebert FT, Dyson RH (2002) Prehistoric Nishapur and frontier between Central Asia and Iran. Iranica Antiqua XXXVII: 113–149</ref> Nevertheless, this area was not an insurmountable obstacle for the dispersal of the Neolithic. The route south of the Caspian sea is a part of the Silk Road, some sections of which were in use from at least 3,000 BCE, connecting Badakhshan (north-eastern Afghanistan and south-eastern Tajikistan) with Western Asia, Egypt and India [27].<ref>Kuzmina EE, Mair VH (2008) The Prehistory of the Silk Road. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press</ref> Similarly, the section from Badakhshan to the Mesopotamian plains (the [[Great Khorasan Road]]) was apparently functioning by 4,000 BCE and numerous prehistoric sites are located along it, whose assemblages are dominated by the [[Cheshmeh-Ali (Shahr-e-Rey)|Cheshmeh-Ali]] (Tehran Plain) ceramic technology, forms and designs [26].<ref name="Hiebert FT 2002">Hiebert FT, Dyson RH (2002) Prehistoric Nishapur and frontier between Central Asia and Iran. Iranica Antiqua XXXVII: 113–149</ref> Striking similarities in figurines and pottery styles, and mud-brick shapes, between widely separated early Neolithic sites in the Zagros Mountains of north-western Iran (Jarmo and Sarab), the Deh Luran Plain in southwestern Iran (Tappeh Ali Kosh and Chogha Sefid), Susiana (Chogha Bonut and Chogha Mish), the Iranian Central Plateau ([[Sang-i Chakmak|Tappeh-Sang-e Chakhmaq]]), and Turkmenistan (Jeitun) suggest a common incipient culture [28].<ref>Alizadeh A (2003) Excavations at the prehistoric mound of Chogha Bonut, Khuzestan, Iran. Technical report, University of Chicago, Illinois.</ref> The Neolithic dispersal across South Asia plausibly involved migration of the population ([29]<ref>Dolukhanov P (1994) Environment and Ethnicity in the Ancient Middle East. Aldershot: Ashgate.</ref> and [25], pp. 231–233).<ref name="Harris DR 2010">Harris DR (2010) Origins of Agriculture in Western Central Asia: An Environmental-Archaeological Study. Philadelphia: Univ. Pennsylvania Press.</ref> This possibility is also supported by Y-chromosome and mtDNA analyses [30],<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Quintana-Murci | first1 = L | last2 = Krausz | first2 = C | last3 = Zerjal | first3 = T | last4 = Sayar | first4 = SH | last5 = Hammer | first5 = MF | display-authors = et al | year = 2001 | title = Y-chromosome lineages trace diffusion of people and languages in Southwestern Asia | journal = Am J Hum Genet | volume = 68 | issue = 2| pages = 537–542 | doi=10.1086/318200 | pmid=11133362 | pmc=1235289}}</ref> [31]."<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Quintana-Murci | first1 = L | last2 = Chaix | first2 = R | last3 = Spencer Wells | first3 = R | last4 = Behar | first4 = DM | last5 = Sayar | first5 = H | display-authors = et al | year = 2004 | title = Where West meets East: the complex mtDNA landscape of the Southwest and Central Asian corridor | journal = Am J Hum Genet | volume = 74 | issue = 5| pages = 827–845 | doi=10.1086/383236 | pmid=15077202 | pmc=1181978}}</ref>}}<!--**END OF NOTE**--> dan kesamaan antara situs-situs Neolitikum dari Mesopotamia timur dan lembah Indus barat, yang merupakan bukti “kontinum budaya” di antara situs-situs tersebut. Namun mengingat keaslian Mehrgarh, Jarrige menyimpulkan bahwa Mehrgarh memiliki latar belakang lokal yang lebih awal, dan bukan merupakan {{“‘}}backwater’backwater dari budaya Neolitikum Timur Dekat”. <ref name="Jarrige" />
 
== Refrensi ==
<references />