Toonen v. Australia: Perbedaan antara revisi

 

Sebagai tanggapan terhadap keputusan ini, pemerintah Australia mengesampingkan hukum sodomi di Tasmania.<ref name="Human">{{cite web |title=Human Rights Explained, Case Studies: Complaints about Australia to the Human Rights Committee|url=http://www.humanrights.gov.au/education/hr_explained/case_studies.html|publisher=Australian Human Rights Commission|accessdate=2008-12-20}}</ref> Keputusan ini merupakan keputusan yang penting karena sering kali dikutip dalam kasus-kasus yang berkenaan dengan kriminalisasi seks sesama jenis.<ref name="Botswana">{{cite web |title=The Violations of the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons in Botswana: A Shadow Report Submitted to Human Rights Watch|url=http://www.asylumlaw.org/docs/sexualminorities/BOTSWANA033108.pdf|publisher=The Botswana Network on Ethics, Law and HIV/AIDS (BONELA); The Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals of Botswana (LeGaBiBo); Global Rights; and the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) |accessdate=2008-12-20}}</ref>

 

== Catatan kaki ==

{{Instrumen HAM}}