Medellín v. Texas: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
k →top: clean up |
||
(5 revisi perantara oleh 3 pengguna tidak ditampilkan) | |||
Baris 10:
|ParallelCitations=128 S. Ct. 1346; 170 [[L. Ed. 2d]] 190; 2008 [[U.S. LEXIS]] 2912; 76 U.S.L.W. 4143; 2008-1 U.S. Tax Cas. ([[CCH (company)|CCH]]) ¶ 50,242; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 126
|Docket=06-984
|Prior=''Medellín v. State,'' No. 71,997 ([[Texas Court of Criminal Appeals|Tex. Crim. App.]], May 16, 1997); permohonan ditolak, [[
|Subsequent=Pemberlakuan perintah dan permohonan materil ditolak, {{ussc|554|759|2008|el=no}} (''[[2007 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Medellín v. Texas|Medellín III]]'')
|OralArgument=https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_984/argument/
Baris 38:
| other_url1 ={{SCOTUS URL Slip|07|06-984}}
}}
*{{cite journal |last=Geslison |first=Benjamin A. |year=2009 |title=Treaties, Execution, and Originalism in Medellín v. Texas, 128 S. Ct. 1346 (2008) |journal=Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy |volume=32 |issue=2 |pages=767 |url=http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/geslison_final.pdf |access-date=2021-02-18 |archive-date=2016-09-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160928235909/http://www.harvard-jlpp.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/geslison_final.pdf |dead-url=yes }}
*{{cite journal |last=McGuinness |first=Margaret E. |year=2008 |title=Three Narratives of ''Medellín v. Texas'' |journal=Suffolk Transnational Law Review |volume=31 |issue=2 |pages=227 |issn=1072-8546 }}
*{{cite journal |last=Charnovitz|first=Steve |date=July 2008 |title=Revitalizing the U.S. Compliance Power |journal=American Journal of International Law |volume=102 |issue=3 |pages=551–562 |doi=10.2307/20456643 |publisher=The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 102, No. 3|jstor= 20456643 |url=https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1460&context=faculty_publications }}
*{{cite journal |last=Turner|first=James A. |date=February 2010 |title=The Post-Medellin Case for Legislative Standing. |journal=American University Law Review |volume=59 |issue=3 |pages=732–779 |url= http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/stusch_lawrev/20/}}
[[Kategori:Putusan Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat]]
|