Pengguna:NFarras/Proyek 3: Perbedaan antara revisi

{{Redirect|WP:N|the neutrality policy|WP:NPOV|noticeboards|WP:PNB}}

{{Redirect|WP:NOTE|article footnotes|WP:NOTES|notifications|WP:NOTIFS}}

 

<section begin=nutshell />{{nutshell|

Wikipedia articles cover ''notable topics''—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are [[WP:What Wikipedia is not|not outside the scope of Wikipedia]]. We consider evidence from [[WP:RS|reliable]] and [[WP:Independent sources|independent sources]] to gauge this attention. The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic may have its own article.}}<section end=nutshell />{{layak}}

Dalam Wikipedia, '''kelayakan''' adalah kriteria penentuan apakah suatu subyek <nowiki>'''layak'''</nowiki> untuk dibuatkan artikelnya atau tidak.

 

 

A topic is [[rebuttable presumption|presumed]] to merit an article if:

[[:Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines|Subject-specific notability guidelines]] and [[Wikipedia:Advice pages|WikiProject advice pages]] may provide information on how to make these editorial decisions in particular subject areas. When a standalone page is created, it can be [[WP:SPINOFF|spun off]] from a broader page. Conversely, when notable topics are not given standalone pages, [[WP:REDIRECT|redirection pages]] and [[WP:DISAMBIGUATION|disambiguation]] can be used to direct readers searching for such topics to the appropriate articles and sections within them (see also [[Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap]]).

 

{{shortcut|WP:WHYN}}

Editors apply notability standards to all subjects to determine whether the English language Wikipedia should have a separate, stand-alone article on that subject. The primary purpose of these standards is to ensure that editors create articles that comply with major content policies.

Because these requirements are based on major content policies, they apply to all articles, not solely articles justified under the [[WP:GNG|general notability criteria]]. They do not, however, apply to pages whose primary purpose is navigation (e.g. all [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguation]] pages and [[WP:LSC|some lists]]).

 

{{Shortcut|WP:SPIP}}

Publication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability. [[WP:Promotion|Wikipedia is not a promotional medium]]. Self-promotion, autobiography, product placement and most [[WP:Paid editing|paid material]] are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.

Independent sources are also needed to guarantee a [[WP:NPOV|neutral article]] can be written; see [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]] for discussion of neutrality concerns of self-published sources. Even non-promotional self-published sources, like technical manuals that accompany a product, are still not evidence of notability as they are not a measure of the attention a subject has received.

 

{{shortcut|WP:SBST}}

{{main|Wikipedia:Notability (events)}}

[[WP:NOTNEWS|Wikipedia is not a news source]]: it takes more than just routine news reports about a single event or topic to constitute significant coverage. For example, routine news coverage such as press releases, public announcements, sports coverage, and [[Tabloid journalism#To refer to sensationalist journalistic practices|tabloid journalism]] is not significant coverage. Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage. The Wikimedia project [[n:Main page|Wikinews]] covers topics of present news coverage. In some cases, notability of a controversial entity (such as a book) could arise {{em|either}} because the entity itself was notable, {{em|or}} because the controversy was notable as an event—both need considering.

 

{{Shortcut|WP:NOTESAL|WP:LISTN|WP:NLIST}}

{{Further|Wikipedia:Manual of Style (stand-alone lists)#Selection criteria}}

For guidance on fringe topics, see [[Wikipedia:Fringe theories]].

 

{{Shortcut|WP:FAILN}}

 

* [[MOS:NOTE]]: Manual of Style on "Instructional and presumptuous language"

 

{{Reflist|2}}

<!-- essays and the like should go in the category below, which serves as a general list of 'related issues' -->