Henrietta Lacks: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Baris 41:
"percampuran", "perkembangan biak liar, "kehidupan laboratorium berwarna", "monster diantara Pirex". Beberapa menulis tentang "dominasi dunia oleh HeLa" atau HeLa menguasai dunia. Landecker menulis tentang naratif bahwa "mengambil tata rasial perkawinan antara suku atau bangsa dan polusi hereditas", dan menggambarkan sel HeLa "permasalahan rasial terhadap ilmu pengetahuan".
 
NextSelanjutnya inpada thetahun 1980s[[1980-an]] anddan 1990s[[1990-an]], according tomenurut Landecker, perhitungan economic and monetary considerations began toekonomi bedan stressedmoneter andmulai thereditekan wasdan aterdapat focusfokus onpada "economicketidakadilan injusticeekonomi". "economic exploitation", economic value, and "economic power and privilege." In the last instance, the poverty of one is contrasted to the wealth of the other. Levels of educations are contrasted as well. Three inclinations however persist in these narratives over time, namely inclinations (1) to emphasize HeLa's [[immortality]], (2) to "obscure" (2007, 171) and "mask" (2007,64) Lacks' death or misdiagnosis (3) to use her photographs, "as was the case" with the tissue from a biopsy as well, "without any indication that permission was sought or given for its use, either from Lacks or her family". (2000, fn 61,264).
 
Landecker states that "Although it is difficult to say whether an accurate diagnosis of adenocarcinoma would have helped in Lack's treatment", what was evident to her was a "total absence of questioning of the circumstances and adequacy of her medical treatment --- even with the clearly stated admission of misdiagnostic error published in 1971" among scientists and journalists. To Landecker this "absence of questioning... indicates the power of the concepts of immortality produced by the life of these cells." The "death of a person who was Henrietta Lacks has been obscured by the personification of her cells as an immortal entity".(2000,55)