Etnografi siber: Perbedaan antara revisi

Selama etnografi siber mirip dengan etnografi tradisional, hal itu akan menimbulkan pertimbangan etis yang serupa. Namun, sifat ruang daring memang memunculkan masalah etika baru, termasuk yang terkait dengan persetujuan subjek manusia, perlindungan privasi atau anonimitas subjek penelitian, dan apakah etnografi siber mungkin merupakan bentuk "penyadapan elektronik."<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wilson|first=Samuel M.|last2=Peterson|first2=Leighton C.|date=2002-10-01|title=The Anthropology of Online Communities|url=https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436|journal=Annual Review of Anthropology|volume=31|issue=1|pages=461|doi=10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436|issn=0084-6570|quote=For some researchers, the statements made in publicly accessible discussion boards or other communication spaces are in the public domain and may thus be freely used by researchers. For others, this is a form of electronic eavesdropping that violates the speaker's expectation of privacy. For others, this is a form of electronic eavesdropping that violates the speaker's expectation of privacy.}}</ref> Dengan demikian, ada masalah etika yang signifikan seputar penggunaan alat digital, pengumpulan data dari dunia maya, dan apakah ahli etnografi siber menghormati privasi di dunia maya.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Hesse-Biber|first=Sharlene Nagy|date=2011-01-15|url=https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Q9HlpMF7GgkC&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false|title=The Handbook of Emergent Technologies in Social Research|location=|publisher=Oxford University Press|isbn=978-0-19-970625-9|pages=184|language=en|quote=In sum, if our identities in cyberspace are extensions of our off-line identities, they must be afforded the same ethical consideration as they would be given in the off-line world.|url-status=live}}</ref>

 

 

== Pandangan etika ==