Deklarasi Barrington Raya: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
kTidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
|||
Baris 49:
== Memorandum saingan ==
Memorandum John Snow, yang diterbitkan dalam ''[[The Lancet]]'', <ref>{{Cite web|title=John Snow Memorandum|url=https://www.johnsnowmemo.com/|access-date=2020-10-15}}</ref> adalah tanggapan dari 80 peneliti (yang merupakan "ahli dari dunia epidemiologi, penyakit menular dan vaksinasi") yang mengecam pendekatan imunitas kelompok dari Deklarasi Great Barrington.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Triggle|first=Nick|last2=Mason|first2=Chris|last3=Hamilton|first3=Claire|date=2020-10-17|title=Covid: What the tier rules say about the split between science and politics|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54546867|work=BBC News|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-10-17}}</ref> Memorandum ini mengambil namanya dari [[John Snow]], ahli epidemiologi yang bekerja pada [[1854 Wabah kolera Broad Street|wabah kolera di Jalan Broad tahun 1854]],<ref name="usatoday1410" /><ref name=":11">{{Cite journal|title=Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now|url=https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/article/s0140-6736(20)32153-x|journal=The Lancet|access-date=2020-10-15}}</ref> menyatakan bahwa gagasan kekebalan kelompok adalah "kekeliruan berbahaya yang tidak didukung oleh bukti ilmiah". <ref
Penulis surat tersebut dikoordinasikan oleh Deepti Gurdasani, ahli epidemiologi klinis di [[Queen Mary, Universitas London|Queen Mary University of London]], <ref>{{Cite web|title=Herd immunity in COVID-19 control is a dangerous fallacy, say authors of open letter|url=https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2020/smd/herd-immunity-in-covid-19-control-is-a-dangerous-fallacy-say-authors-of-open-letter.html|website=Queen Mary University of London|language=en|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> <ref name=":15">{{Cite web|date=15 October 2020|title=SARS-CoV-2: Experten streiten über Herdenimmunität als Strategie|url=https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/117444/SARS-CoV-2-Experten-streiten-ueber-Herdenimmunitaet-als-Strategie|website=Deutsches Ärzteblatt|language=de|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> dan termasuk Marc Lipsitch, William Hanage, <ref>{{Cite news|last=Cunningham|first=Paige Winfield|date=16 October 2020|title=Analysis {{!}} The Health 202: Health officials call an anti-lockdown paper 'dangerous.' Its authors say they just want the idea debated.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/16/health-202-health-officials-call-an-anti-lockdown-paper-dangerous-its-authors-say-they-just-want-idea-debated/|work=[[The Washington Post]]|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> <ref name="BostonGlobe">{{Cite news|last=Finucane|first=Martin|date=14 October 2020|title=Boston researchers join letter in The Lancet rejecting herd immunity strategy|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/14/nation/boston-researchers-join-letter-lancet-rejecting-herd-immunity-strategy/|work=The Boston Globe|access-date=18 October 2020}}<cite class="citation news cs1" data-ve-ignore="true" id="CITEREFFinucane2020">Finucane, Martin (14 October 2020). [https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/14/nation/boston-researchers-join-letter-lancet-rejecting-herd-immunity-strategy/ "Boston researchers join letter in The Lancet rejecting herd immunity strategy"]. ''The Boston Globe''<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">18 October</span> 2020</span>.</cite></ref> Nahid Bhadelia, Isabella Eckerle, <ref name=":16">{{Cite web|last=Lancet/jdp|title=Swiss health experts sign letter wary of herd immunity claims|url=https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-health-experts-sign-letter-wary-of-herd-immunity-claims/46098370|website=Swissinfo|publisher=Swiss Broadcasting Corporation|language=en|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> Emma Hodcroft, Martin McKee, <ref name=":17">{{Cite web|last=McKee|first=Martin|last2=Stuckler|first2=David|date=2020-10-15|title=Scientific divisions on covid-19: not what they might seem|url=https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/10/15/scientific-divisions-on-covid-19-not-what-they-might-seem/|website=The BMJ|language=en-gb|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> Dominic Pimenta, <ref>{{Cite web|last=Pimenta|first=Dominic|date=15 October 2020|title=Herd immunity could cost hundreds of thousands of lives|url=http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2020/10/15/a-herd-immunity-theory-could-cost-hundreds-of-thousands-of-l|website=politics.co.uk|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201018141633/https://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2020/10/15/a-herd-immunity-theory-could-cost-hundreds-of-thousands-of-l|archive-date=18 October 2020|access-date=2020-10-18|url-status=dead}}</ref> Viola Priesemann, Devi Sridhar, <ref>{{Cite web|date=15 October 2020|title=Herd immunity approaches to control Covid-19 'a dangerous fallacy', say scientists – ET HealthWorld|url=https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/diagnostics/herd-immunity-approaches-to-control-covid-19-a-dangerous-fallacy-say-scientists/78681234|website=Health World, Economic Times|language=en|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> Gavin Yamey, <ref>{{Cite web|last=Ahemed|first=Nafeez|date=14 October 2020|title=How the White House's Herd Immunity Strategy Would Destroy the US Economy|url=https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/15/how-the-white-houses-herd-immunity-strategy-would-destroy-the-us-economy/|website=Byline Times|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> dan Rochelle Walensky.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Alwan|first=Nisreen A|last2=Burgess|first2=Rochelle Ann|last3=Ashworth|first3=Simon|last4=Beale|first4=Rupert|last5=Bhadelia|first5=Nahid|last6=Bogaert|first6=Debby|last7=Dowd|first7=Jennifer|last8=Eckerle|first8=Isabella|last9=Goldman|first9=Lynn R|date=15 October 2020|title=Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now|url=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32153-X|journal=The Lancet|volume=396|issue=10260|pages=e71–e72|doi=10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32153-x|issn=0140-6736|pmc=7557300|pmid=33069277}}</ref>
| |||