Wikipedia:Proses penghapusan: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
RaFaDa20631 (bicara | kontrib) |
RaFaDa20631 (bicara | kontrib) Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
||
Baris 150:
| Pengalihan ditargetkan pada subbab tertentu (misal [[Afrika]] → [[Afrika|Afrika#Sejarah]])
|}
== Closing discussions that run their full time==
Discussions are usually closed after seven days (168 hours). If there is a lack of comments, or the action to take is unclear, the discussion may be relisted for an additional seven days. Usually, both closing and relisting are administrator actions, but experienced users in good standing may relist pages.
{| class=wikitable
|+ Closing instructions
! scope="col" | Discussion type
! scope="col" | Information page
! scope="col" | Instructions for closing
|-
! scope="row" | Articles for deletion (AfD){{anchor|AFD}}{{anchor|AfD}}
| [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]]
| {{shortcut| WP:DELPRO#AFD| WP:DPR#AFD}}
[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions]]
|-
! scope="row" | Categories for discussion (CfD){{anchor|CFD}}{{anchor|CfD}}
| [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion]]
| {{shortcut| WP:DELPRO#CFD| WP:DPR#CFD}}
[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions]]
|-
! scope="row" | Files for discussion (FfD){{anchor|IFD}}{{anchor|IfD}}{{anchor|FFD}}{{anchor|FfD}}
| [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion]]
| {{shortcut| WP:DELPRO#FFD| WP:DPR#FFD}}
[[Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Administrator instructions]]
|-
! scope="row" | Miscellany for deletion (MfD){{anchor|MFD}}{{anchor|MfD}}
| [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion]]
| {{shortcut| WP:DELPRO#MFD| WP:DPR#MFD}}
[[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Administrator instructions]]
|-
! scope="row" | Redirects for discussion (RfD){{anchor|RFD}}{{anchor|RfD}}
| [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion]]
| {{shortcut| WP:DELPRO#RFD| WP:DPR#RFD}}
[[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Administrator instructions]]
|-
! scope="row" | Templates for discussion (TfD){{anchor|TFD}}{{anchor|TfD}}
| [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion]]
| {{shortcut| WP:DELPRO#TFD| WP:DPR#TFD}}
[[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Administrator instructions]]
|-
! scope="row" | Deletion review (DRV){{anchor|DRV}}
| [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]]
| {{shortcut| WP:DELPRO#DRV| WP:DPR#DRV}}
[[Wikipedia:Deletion review/Administrator instructions]]
|}
===Relisting discussions===
{{redirect|Wikipedia:Relisting|relisting requested moves|Wikipedia:Requested moves#Relisting a requested move}}
{{shortcut|WP:RELIST}}
{{See also|Wikipedia:Dashboard/Relisted AfD debates}}
The intent of the deletion process is to attempt to determine [[WP:CON|consensus]] on whether an article should be deleted.
However, if at the end of the initial seven-day period, the discussion has only a few participants (including the nominator), or it seems to be lacking arguments based on policy, it may be appropriate for the closer to '''relist''' it, to solicit further discussion to determine consensus.<ref>However, discussions with minimal participation where no one opposes deletion should be closed per [[WP:NOQUORUM]].</ref> '''Discussions where there is minimal participation should be evaluated by the closing administrator as an expired PROD before deciding whether it is appropriate to relist.''' A relisted discussion may be closed once consensus is determined without necessarily waiting a further seven days.
That said, relisting should not be a substitute for a "no consensus" closure. If the closer feels there has been substantive debate, disparate opinions supported by policy have been expressed, and consensus has not been achieved, a no-consensus close may be preferable.
Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended, and while having a deletion notice on a page is not harmful, its presence over several weeks can become disheartening for its editors. Therefore, '''in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice.''' Users relisting a debate for a third (or further) time, or relisting a debate with a substantial number of commenters, should write a short explanation either within the {{tl|relist}} template, or in addition to it, on why they did not consider the debate sufficient. However, if adding comments ''within'' {{tl|relist}}, please keep in mind that this is a Wikipedia administration template, and should not be used to give priority to one's own desired outcome.
When relisting a discussion, it should be '''removed from the log for its original date''' (this does not apply at [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|Categories for discussion]]) and moved to the current date's log where the discussion will continue. Scripts and gadgets such as [[Wikipedia:XFDcloser|XFDcloser]] automate the process.
===Non-administrators closing discussions===
{{anchor|NAC}}
{{shortcut|WP:NACD}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Non-admin closure}}
In general, [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] are responsible for closing deletion discussions, but non-administrators who are registered (i.e. not IPs) may close discussions, with the following provisions:
* Like all discussions, deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] and [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|Wikipedia policies and guidelines]]. If you are not fairly experienced, or are unfamiliar with [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] or the workings of deletion discussions, do not close such discussions.
* Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to admins.
* Non-administrators should limit their closes to outcomes they have the technical ability to implement; for example, non-admins should not close a discussion as ''delete'', because only admins can delete pages.
**Exception: a non-administrator may close a TfD as ''orphan''.<ref>See [[Wikipedia talk:Templates for_discussion/Archive 19#RfC: Proposal to allow non-admin "delete" closures at TfD|this July 2015 discussion]].</ref>
* Do not close discussions in which you have offered an opinion, or for a page in which you have a [[Wikipedia:Vested interest|vested interest]] (i.e. a page that you have edited heavily). Exception: closing your own withdrawn nomination as a [[Wikipedia:Speedy keep|speedy keep]], when all other viewpoints were for keep as well.
* Non-admins should indicate their non-admin status with the {{t|nac}} ("non-admin close") template, which should always be <code>subst</code>ituted e.g.
**<code>{{Tlxs|Afd top}} <nowiki>'''Keep''' per [[WP:SNOW]]. {{subst:nac}} ~~~~</nowiki></code>
If an administrator has deleted a page (including by speedy deletion) but neglected to close the discussion, anyone may close the discussion provided that the administrator's name and deletion summary are included in the closing rationale.
Closures may '''only''' be reopened by the closer themselves; by an uninvolved administrator in their individual capacity, giving their reasoning; or by consensus at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]. If this happens, take it only as a sign that the decision was not as obvious as you thought. Editors reopening discussions are advised to notify the original closer.
===Transwiki===
If consensus indicates a [[m:Help:Transwiki|transwiki]] should take place, but you do not want to complete the transwiki process immediately:
# Add a new entry to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old/Transwiki]].
# Add the appropriate tag to the article:
#*{{tl|Copy to Wiktionary}}
#*{{tl|Copy to Wikisource}}
#*{{tl|Copy to Wikiquote}}
#*{{tl|Copy to Wikibooks}}
#*{{tl|Copy to Wikibooks Cookbook}}
#*{{tl|Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}
===Pages with many revisions===
{{Shortcut|WP:BIGDELETE}}
The deletion of pages with long histories may impact server performance. As a precaution, therefore, deletions of pages with more than [[mw:Manual:$wgDeleteRevisionsLimit|5,000 revisions]] require the special "bigdelete" user right, which administrators do not have. Such deletions can be requested of stewards at [[:meta:Steward requests/Miscellaneous]].
== Catatan kaki ==
{{reflist}}
| |||