Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close (film): Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.1 |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.2 |
||
Baris 133:
=== Best Picture nomination ===
Before the film's release, ''Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close'' was expected to be a major contender at the [[84th Academy Awards]] ([[Stephen Daldry]]'s previous two films had garnered [[Academy Award for Best Picture|Best Picture]] nominations). However, due to the film's polarizing reception and being ignored by most of the Critics Groups Awards, the [[Golden Globe Award]]s, the [[British Academy Film Awards]], and the [[Screen Actors Guild Award]]s, it was no longer deemed as a major contender.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vokle.com/events/45818-oscar-nomination-reactions-and-analysis| title= Oscar Nomination Reactions and Analysis| accessdate =March 13, 2012}}</ref> Nevertheless, the film was nominated for [[Academy Award for Best Picture|Best Picture]] and [[Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor|Best Supporting Actor]]. Critics and audiences criticized the film's nomination for Best Picture, with some calling the film one of the worst Best Picture nominees ever.<ref>{{cite news|first=Xan|last=Brooks|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2012/feb/23/oscars-extremely-loud-incredibly-close|title=Oscars 2012: Is Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close the worst best picture nominee ever? | Film|work=The Guardian|date= February 23, 2012|accessdate=2012-07-07|location=London}}</ref> It is the only widely reviewed film on aggregator [[Rotten Tomatoes]] with a "rotten" rating to receive a Best Picture nomination.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close/news/1924581/2/total_recall_worst-reviewed_best_picture_nominees/ |title=Salinan arsip |access-date=2015-08-19 |archive-date=2014-10-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029154413/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/extremely_loud_and_incredibly_close/news/1924581/2/total_recall_worst-reviewed_best_picture_nominees/ |dead-url=yes }}</ref> Chris Krapek of ''[[The Huffington Post]]'' wrote very negatively about the film's nomination, calling the film "not only the worst reviewed Best Picture nominee of the last 10 years, [but] easily the worst film of 2011".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-krapek/extremely-loud-oscar-angs_b_1291485.html|title=Chris Krapek: Extremely Loud Oscar Angst|publisher=Huffingtonpost.com|date= February 22, 2012|accessdate=2012-07-07}}</ref> ''[[Paste (magazine)|Paste]]'' Magazine's Adam Vitcavage called the film's consensus for a Best Picture nominee "certainly the worst for at least 28 years",<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2012/01/examining-extremely-loud-and-incredibly-closes-osc.html |title=Is Extremely Loud the Worst-Reviewed Oscar-Nominated Movie in History? |publisher=Pastemagazine.com |date=2012-01-25 |accessdate=2012-07-07}}</ref> and David Gritten of [[The Telegraph (UK)|''The Telegraph'']] calls the nomination "mysterious".<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/oscars/9042051/Oscars-2012-The-mystery-of-the-ninth-Oscar-nomination-for-best-film.html|title=Oscars 2012: The mystery of the ninth Oscar nomination for best film|work=The Daily Telegraph|date= January 27, 2012|accessdate=2012-07-07|location=London|first=David|last=Gritten}}</ref>
Many critics have blamed the new Best Picture rules for the nomination. John Young at ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' says that when it comes to the new rules, "it's better to be loved by a small and passionate group instead of liked by a much larger group",<ref>{{cite web|last=Bierly |first=Mandi |url=http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/01/24/oscars-best-picture-why-nine-nominees/ |title=Academy Award nominations: Why 9 Best Pic nominees? | Inside Movies | EW.com |publisher=Insidemovies.ew.com |date= |accessdate=2012-07-07}}</ref> and Jen Chaney at ''[[The Washington Post]]'', believes that, "the Academy should've just stuck to the 10 rule so that films like [[The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011 film)|''Dragon Tattoo'']] or [[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2|''Harry Potter'']] could've joined the other worthy contenders, because if you’re going to create a bunch of drama around the number of nominees and then come up one shy of what has become the typical total, that just feels like a letdown."<ref>{{cite news|last=Chaney|first=Jen|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/celebritology/post/oscar-nominations-2012-did-the-best-picture-change-make-a-difference/2012/01/24/gIQAy9hRNQ_blog.html|title=Oscar nominations 2012: Did the best picture change make a difference? - Celebritology 2.0|work=The Washington Post|date=2012-01-24|accessdate=2012-07-07}}</ref> ''[[The Week]]'' writes that the new rules are a failure, as it lets "smaller, divisive movies that the Academy had hoped to weed out, like ''[[The Tree of Life (film)|Tree of Life]]'' and ''Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close'' in, but prevents {{sic|hide=y|critically|-}}praised crowd pleasers like ''[[Bridesmaids (2011 film)|Bridesmaids]]'' and [[The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011 film)|''The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo'']] from being nominated."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://theweek.com/article/index/223644/oscars-2012-are-the-new-best-picture-rules-a-failure |title=Oscars 2012: Are the new Best Picture rules a failure? |publisher=The Week|accessdate=2012-07-07}}</ref>
| |||