Injil: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
|||
Baris 38:
Another theory which addresses the synoptic problem is the [[Farrer hypothesis]]. This theory maintains [[Markan priority]] (that Mark was written first) and dispenses with the need for a theoretical document Q. What [[Austin Farrer]] has argued is that Luke used Matthew as a source as well as Mark, explaining the similarities between them without having to refer to a hypothetical document.-->
Perkiraan kurun waktu ditulisnya injil bervariasi. Berikkut perkiraan kurun waktu yang diberikan oleh [[Raymond E. Brown]], dalam buku-nya ''"An Introduction to the New Testament"'', sebagai representasi atas konsensus umum para sarjana, pada tahun 1996:
* '''Markus''':
* '''Matius''':
* '''Lukas''':
* '''Yohanes''':
Sedangkan, perkiraan kurun waktu yang diberikan dalam ''NIV Study Bible'':
* '''Markus''':
* '''Matius''': c. 50 hingga tahun 70'an
* '''Lukas''': c. 59 hingga tahun 63
* '''Yohanes''':
<!--Estimates for the dates when the canonical Gospel accounts were written vary significantly; and the evidence for any of the dates is scanty. Because the earliest surviving complete copies of the Gospels date to the [[4th century]] and because only fragments and quotations exist before that, scholars use [[higher criticism]] to propose likely ranges of dates for the original gospel autographs. Conservative scholars tend to date earlier than others while liberal scholars usually date as late as possible.-->
| |||