Wikipedia

Deklarasi Barrington Raya: Perbedaan antara revisi

Jelajahi riwayat secara interaktif
← Revisi sebelumnyaRevisi selanjutnya →
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
VisualTeks wiki
Dinno806 (bicara | kontrib)
4.175 suntingan
Dinno806 (bicara | kontrib)
4.175 suntingan
kTidak ada ringkasan suntingan
Baris 11:
 
== Isi deklarasi ==
Deklarasi singkat tersebut mendukung strategi yang oleh para penulis disebut "perlindungan terfokus". Mereka ingin mengakhiri perintah untuk [[Perintah untuk tinggal di rumah|tinggal di rumah]] dan pembatasan aktivitas lainnya.<ref name="Guardian">{{Cite news|last=Sample|first=Ian|date=6 October 2020|title=Scientists call for herd immunity Covid strategy for young|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/06/scientists-call-for-herd-immunity-covid-strategy-for-young|work=[[The Guardian]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201006182539/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/06/scientists-call-for-herd-immunity-covid-strategy-for-young|archive-date=6 October 2020|access-date=6 October 2020|url-status=live}}<cite class="citation news cs1" data-ve-ignore="true">Sample, Ian (6 October 2020). [https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/06/scientists-call-for-herd-immunity-covid-strategy-for-young "Scientists call for herd immunity Covid strategy for young"]. ''[[The Guardian]]''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20201006182539/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/06/scientists-call-for-herd-immunity-covid-strategy-for-young Archived] from the original on 6 October 2020<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">6 October</span> 2020</span>.</cite></ref> Sebaliknya, mereka ingin individu, untuk secara pribadi memilih risiko, aktivitas, dan batasan yang mereka sukai.<ref name=":10">{{Cite web|last=Gartz|first=Micha|title=The Great Barrington Declaration Is Not Saying 'Lock Up Grandma'|url=https://www.aier.org/article/the-great-barrington-declaration-is-not-saying-lock-up-grandma/|website=www.aier.org|language=en-US|access-date=2020-10-12}}</ref>
 
Deklarasi tersebut mengatakan bahwa karantina memiliki efek buruk pada kesehatan fisik dan mental, misalnya, karantinya menyebabkan orang menunda [[Profilaksis|perawatan kesehatan preventif]].<ref name="Guardian" /> Mereka mengusulkan pengurangan kerugian ini dengan mengakhiri pembatasan wajib pada sebagian besar aktivitas bagi kebanyakan orang. Tanpa batasan ini, lebih banyak orang akan mengembangkan COVID-19. Mereka percaya bahwa infeksi ini akan menghasilkan [[kekebalan kelompok]] (gagasan bahwa ketika cukup banyak orang menjadi kebal, maka virus akan berhenti beredar secara luas), yang pada akhirnya akan memperkecil kemungkinan orang yang berisiko tinggi akan terpapar virus.
Baris 23:
== Penulis ==
[[Berkas:Kulldorff_gupta_bhattacharya.jpg|jmpl|Penulis Deklarasi Great Barrington di American Institute for Economic Research. (Kiri-Kanan) Martin Kulldorff, Sunetra Gupta, Jay Bhattacharya]]
Sunetra Gupta adalah Profesor Epidemiologi Teoretis di Departemen Zoologi [[Universitas Oxford]].<ref>{{Cite web|title=Professor Sunetra Gupta|url=https://www.zoo.ox.ac.uk/people/professor-sunetra-gupta|publisher=[[University of Oxford]]|access-date=21 October 2020}}</ref> Gupta telah menjadi kritikus strategi karantina COVID-19 yang berlaku, dengan alasan bahwa karantina akan sangat merugikan bagi kelompok masyarakat yang paling miskin, dan menyatakan keprihatinan tentang [[Ketahanan pangan selama pandemi COVID-19|risiko kelaparan yang meluas]] di banyak negara karena gangguan rantai pasokan makanan akibat adanya karantina.<ref name="BMJ">{{Cite journal|last=Lenzer, Jeanne|date=7 October 2020|title=Covid-19: Group of UK and US experts argues for "focused protection" instead of lockdowns|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3908|journal=[[British Medical Journal]]|publisher=British Medical Association|volume=371|pages=m3908|doi=10.1136/bmj.m3908|pmid=33028622|access-date=18 October 2020}}<cite class="citation journal cs1" data-ve-ignore="true" id="CITEREFLenzer,_Jeanne2020">Lenzer, Jeanne (7 October 2020). [https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3908 "Covid-19: Group of UK and US experts argues for "focused protection" instead of lockdowns"]. ''[[BMJ|British Medical Journal]]''. British Medical Association. '''371''': m3908. [[Pengenal objek digital|doi]]:<span class="cs1-lock-free" title="Freely accessible">[[doi:10.1136/bmj.m3908|10.1136/bmj.m3908]]</span>. [[PubMed|PMID]]&nbsp;[//pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33028622 33028622]. [[S2CID (pengenal)|S2CID]]&nbsp;[https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:222141502 222141502]<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">18 October</span> 2020</span>.</cite></ref> Pada tahun 2020, Gupta memimpin sebuah kelompok yang pada bulan Maret merilis studi pemodelan, yang dikritik secara luas, yang menunjukkan, dalam salah satu skenarionya, bahwa setengah populasi [[Britania Raya|Inggris Raya]] mungkin telah terinfeksi COVID-19.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sayburn|first=Anna|date=25 March 2020|title=Covid-19: experts question analysis suggesting half UK population has been infected|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1216|journal=BMJ|language=en|volume=368|pages=m1216|doi=10.1136/bmj.m1216|issn=1756-1833|pmid=32213506|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200907194029/https://www.bmj.com/content/368/bmj.m1216|archive-date=7 September 2020|access-date=11 October 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> Selain itu, pada bulan September dia merilis studi yang menyatakan [[Kekebalan kelompok|ambang kekebalan kelompok]] yang sebenarnya dibutuhkan mungkin lebih rendah dari yang ditargetkan karena kekebalan yang sudah ada sebelumnya dalam populasi.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Doshi|first=Peter|date=17 September 2020|title=Covid-19: Do many people have pre-existing immunity?|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563|journal=BMJ|language=en|volume=370|pages=m3563|doi=10.1136/bmj.m3563|issn=1756-1833|pmid=32943427|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201011060617/https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563|archive-date=11 October 2020|access-date=11 October 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> Rupert Beale dari [[Francis Crick Institute]] menggambarkan pracetak Maret sebagai "konyol" dan "bahkan tidak lolos tinjauan sejawat".<ref name=":14">{{Cite web|last=Fishwick|first=Samuel|date=13 October 2020|title='I've had emails calling me evil'... Meet the Covid scientists at war|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-scientists-at-war-a4569551.html|website=Evening Standard|language=en|access-date=17 October 2020}}</ref> Gupta adalah salah satu penulis surat tanggal 21 September kepada perdana menteri Inggris, [[Boris Johnson]], yang merekomendasikan perlindungan yang difokuskan terhadap kelompok orang yang rentan daripada metode karantina.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Wise|first=Jacqui|date=21 September 2020|title=Covid-19: Experts divide into two camps of action&nbsp;– shielding versus blanket policies|url=https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3702|journal=BMJ|language=en|volume=370|pages=m3702|doi=10.1136/bmj.m3702|issn=1756-1833|pmid=32958467|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201004040935/https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3702|archive-date=4 October 2020|access-date=11 October 2020|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
[[Jay Bhattacharya]] adalah profesor kedokteran di Universitas Stanford yang penelitiannya berfokus pada ekonomi perawatan kesehatan. Sebelum ikut menulis deklarasi, Bhattacharya ikut menulis opini di ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' berjudul "Apakah Virus Corona Sama Mematikannya seperti Kata Orang-Orang?". Dia mengklaim bahwa hanya ada sedikit bukti untuk mendukung [[karantina]] di masa [[Pandemi COVID-19 di Amerika Serikat]].<ref name=":6">{{Cite news|last=Bendavid|first=Eran|last2=Bhattacharya|first2=Jay|date=24 March 2020|title=Is the Coronavirus as Deadly as They Say|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464|work=The Wall Street Journal|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201010193241/https://www.wsj.com/articles/is-the-coronavirus-as-deadly-as-they-say-11585088464|archive-date=10 October 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> Dia juga merupakan penulis utama studi serologi yang dirilis pada bulan April yang menunjukkan bahwa sebanyak 80.000 penduduk [[Santa Clara County, California]] mungkin telah terinfeksi.<ref>{{Cite magazine|magazine=Science|archivedate=11 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201011023449/https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/04/antibody-surveys-suggesting-vast-undercount-coronavirus-infections-may-be-unreliable|url-status=live}}</ref> Studi ini dan pelaksanaan penelitiannya menuai kritik luas.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Krieger|first=Lisa|date=21 April 2020|title=Angry statisticians dispute Santa Clara County research that found high infection rates|url=https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/20/feud-over-stanford-coronavirus-study-the-authors-owe-us-all-an-apology/|work=The Mercury News|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200609041655/https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/04/20/feud-over-stanford-coronavirus-study-the-authors-owe-us-all-an-apology/|archive-date=9 June 2020|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Krieger|first=Lisa|date=24 May 2020|title=Stanford coronavirus research: Did politically-motivated scientists hype their speedy study?|url=https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/05/24/coronavirus-research-stanford-scientists-accused-of-hyping-covid-19-antibody-study/|work=The Mercury News|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200604072540/https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/05/24/coronavirus-research-stanford-scientists-accused-of-hyping-covid-19-antibody-study/|archive-date=4 June 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> Studi tersebut kemudian terungkap telah menerima dana yang dirahasiakan dari pendiri [[JetBlue Airways|JetBlue]] David Neeleman.<ref>{{Cite news|last=D'Ambrosio|first=Amanda|date=19 October 2020|title=Who Are the Scientists Behind the Great Barrington Declaration?|url=https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/89204|work=MedPage Today|access-date=26 October 2020}}</ref>
Baris 32:
Deklarasi tersebut disponsori oleh American Institute for Economic Research (AIER), sebuah lembaga pemikir [[libertarian]] yang berbasis di Great Barrington, [[Massachusetts]].
 
Melaporkan deklarasi tersebut, jurnalis ''Byline Times'' Nafeez Ahmed menggambarkan AIER sebagai "institusi yang terlibat dalam jaringan yang didanai [[Keluarga Koch|Koch]] yang menyangkal perubahan iklim karena mereka memiliki investasi dalam industri bahan bakar fosil". The ''Byline Times'' telah melaporkan bahwa organisasi tersebut mengoperasikan dana investasi dengan dana kelolaan $284 juta, dan telah menginvestasikan asetnya di beberapa perusahaan bahan bakar fosil, termasuk [[Chevron Corporation|Chevron]] dan [[ExxonMobil]], raksasa tembakau [[Philip Morris International]], [[Microsoft]], [[Alphabet Inc.]], dan banyak perusahaan lainnya. Pendapatannya di tahun 2018 melebihi US $ 2,2 juta <ref name="BerkshireEdge">{{Cite news|last=Cowgill|first=Terry|date=13 October 2020|title='Great Barrington Declaration' and AIER feeling heat on both sides of the Atlantic|url=https://theberkshireedge.com/great-barrington-declaration-and-aier-feeling-heat-on-both-sides-of-the-atlantic/|work=The Berkshire Edge|access-date=16 October 2020}}</ref> dan termasuk sumbangan sebesar US $ 68.100 dari [[Yayasan Charles Koch|Charles Koch Foundation]].<ref name="NABT">{{Cite news|last=Ahmed|first=Nafeez|author-link=Nafeez Ahmed|date=9 October 2020|title=Climate Science Denial Network Behind Great Barrington Declaration|url=https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/|work=Byline Times|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201010075115/https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/|archive-date=10 October 2020|access-date=11 October 2020|url-status=live}}<cite class="citation news cs1" data-ve-ignore="true" id="CITEREFAhmed2020">[[Nafeez Ahmed|Ahmed, Nafeez]] (9 October 2020). [https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/ "Climate Science Denial Network Behind Great Barrington Declaration"]. ''Byline Times''. [https://web.archive.org/web/20201010075115/https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/09/climate-science-denial-network-behind-great-barrington-declaration/ Archived] from the original on 10 October 2020<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">11 October</span> 2020</span>.</cite></ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-10-12|title=The Left Argues Fallaciously against the Great Barrington Declaration|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-left-argues-fallaciously-against-the-great-barrington-declaration/|website=National Review|language=en-US|access-date=2020-10-13}}</ref> Penelitian kontroversial yang didanai oleh AIER di masa lalu mencakup studi yang menyatakan bahwa [[Sweatshop|sweatshop yang]] memasok perusahaan multinasional bermanfaat bagi mereka yang bekerja di dalamnya,<ref name="GuardianTrish">{{Cite news|last=Greenhalgh|first=Trish|last2=McKee|first2=Martin|last3=Kelly-Irving|first3=Michelle|date=18 October 2020|title=The pursuit of herd immunity is a folly – so who's funding this bad science?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/oct/18/covid-herd-immunity-funding-bad-science-anti-lockdown|work=The Guardian|access-date=18 October 2020}}</ref> dan pernyataan serta publikasi AIER secara konsisten [[Penyangkalan perubahan iklim|mengecilkan risiko perubahan iklim]], dengan judul seperti "Alasan mengapa tidak ada yang mengganggap serius aktivis lingkungan" dan " Orang Brasil Harus Terus Menebang Hutan Hujan Mereka".
 
== Penandatangan ==
Penandatangan berasal dari lintas disiplin ilmu mulai dari [[epidemiologi]], [[Biostatistika|biostatistik]], dan kesehatan masyarakat, [[psikiatri]], hingga keuangan dan [[geografi manusia]], termasuk Sucharit Bhakdi, Angus Dalgleish, Mike Hulme, David L.Katz, [[Michael Levitt]], Gülnur Muradoğlu, David Livermore, Jonas F. Ludvigsson, dan Karol Sikora.<ref name="AIER">{{Cite web|date=5 October 2020|title=AIER Hosts Top Epidemiologists, Authors of the Great Barrington Declaration|url=https://www.aier.org/article/aier-hosts-top-epidemiologists-authors-of-the-great-barrington-declaration/|publisher=American Institute for Economic Research|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201009174054/https://www.aier.org/article/aier-hosts-top-epidemiologists-authors-of-the-great-barrington-declaration/|archive-date=9 October 2020|access-date=10 October 2020|url-status=live}}<cite class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="true">[https://www.aier.org/article/aier-hosts-top-epidemiologists-authors-of-the-great-barrington-declaration/ "AIER Hosts Top Epidemiologists, Authors of the Great Barrington Declaration"]. American Institute for Economic Research. 5 October 2020. [https://web.archive.org/web/20201009174054/https://www.aier.org/article/aier-hosts-top-epidemiologists-authors-of-the-great-barrington-declaration/ Archived] from the original on 9 October 2020<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">10 October</span> 2020</span>.</cite></ref> 
 
Banyak nama-nama palsu berada di antara 175.000 tanda tangan dukungan untuk deklarasi tersebut, termasuk "Mr [[Bananarama|Banana Rama]] ", "Dr Johnny Bananas", "Dr Johnny Fartpants", "Dr Person Fakename", " [[Harold Shipman]] ", "Profesor Notaf Uckingclue ", dan" Prof Cominic Dummings ".<ref name="guardian-herd-immunity-letter-signed-fake-experts">{{Cite news|date=9 October 2020|title=Herd immunity letter signed by fake experts including 'Dr Johnny Bananas'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/09/herd-immunity-letter-signed-fake-experts-dr-johnny-bananas-covid|work=[[The Guardian]]|agency=[[PA Media]]|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201009172803/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/09/herd-immunity-letter-signed-fake-experts-dr-johnny-bananas-covid|archive-date=2020-10-09|access-date=2020-10-09|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|last=Manthorpe|first=Rowland|date=9 October 2020|title=Coronavirus: 'Dr Johnny Bananas' and 'Dr Person Fakename' among medical signatories on herd immunity open letter|url=https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-dr-johnny-bananas-and-dr-person-fakename-among-medical-signatories-on-herd-immunity-open-letter-12099947|work=Sky News|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201010162046/https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-dr-johnny-bananas-and-dr-person-fakename-among-medical-signatories-on-herd-immunity-open-letter-12099947|archive-date=2020-10-10|access-date=2020-10-10|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="indy">{{Cite news|last=Ng|first=Kate|date=9 October 2020|title=Coronavirus: 'Dr Person Fakename' and 'Harold Shipman' signatures on scientists' letter calling on government to embrace herd immunity|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-herd-immunity-great-barrington-declaration-scientists-signatures-fake-names-b912778.html|work=The Independent}}</ref> Lebih dari 100 [[psikoterapi]]s, banyak [[Homeopati|ahli homeopati]], [[fisioterapi]]s, [[Pijat|terapis pijat]], dan orang lain yang tidak relevan dengan pandemi menjadi penandatangan, termasuk pemain dari [[Khoomei]] - gaya [[Nyanyian terus-menerus|menyanyi nada]] Mongolia - digambarkan sebagai "praktisi suara terapeutik". Sebagai tanggapan, Bhattacharya mengatakan bahwa dia menyesali bahwa "beberapa orang telah menyalahgunakan kepercayaan kami dengan menambahkan nama palsu", yang menurutnya "tidak bisa dihindari". Namun, dia menambahkan bahwa "mengingat volume korespondensi yang saya terima dari profesional medis dan kesehatan masyarakat, serta ilmuwan dan ahli epidemiologi, jelas bahwa sejumlah besar ahli beresonansi dengan pesan deklarasi dan seruannya untuk kebijakan perlindungan terfokus".
Baris 42:
 
=== Komentar kritis ===
[[Berkas:Mukhisa_Kituyi,_Houlin_Zhao,_Tedros_Adhanom_Ghebreyesus_with_Sophia_-_AI_for_Good_Global_Summit_2018_(41223188035)_(cropped).jpg|jmpl| Direktur Jenderal WHO [[Tedros Adhanom|Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus]] menggolongkan konsep kekebalan kawanan yang diusulkan dalam Deklarasi Great Barrington sebagai "bermasalah secara ilmiah dan etis".<ref name="GuardianTedros">{{Cite news|last=Staff and agencies in Geneva|date=12 October 2020|title=WHO chief says herd immunity approach to pandemic 'unethical'|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/12/who-chief-says-herd-immunity-approach-to-pandemic-unethical|work=The Guardian|access-date=October 12, 2020}}</ref><ref name="WHOTedros">{{Cite web|date=12 October 2020|title=WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 12 October 2020|url=https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---12-october-2020|publisher=World Health Organization|access-date=12 October 2020}}<cite class="citation web cs1" data-ve-ignore="true">[https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---12-october-2020 "WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 12 October 2020"]. World Health Organization. 12 October 2020<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">12 October</span> 2020</span>.</cite></ref>]]
[[Tedros Adhanom|Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus]], Direktur Jenderal [[Organisasi Kesehatan Dunia]], memperingatkan gagasan membiarkan virus menyebar untuk mencapai kekebalan kawanan pada konferensi pers sebagai "tidak etis". Dia berkata: "Kekebalan kelompok adalah sebuah konsep yang digunakan untuk vaksinasi, di mana suatu populasi dapat dilindungi dari virus tertentu jika ambang batas vaksinasi tercapai ... Kekebalan kelompok dicapai dengan melindungi orang dari virus, bukan dengan memaparkan mereka padanya." Tedros mengatakan bahwa mencoba mencapai kekebalan kelompok dengan membiarkan virus menyebar tanpa terkendali akan "bermasalah secara ilmiah dan etis", terutama mengingat efek jangka panjang dari penyakit tersebut masih belum sepenuhnya dipahami. Dia mengatakan bahwa meskipun "telah ada beberapa diskusi baru-baru ini tentang konsep mencapai apa yang disebut 'kekebalan kelompok' dengan membiarkan virus menyebar, tidak pernah dalam sejarah kesehatan masyarakat telah kekebalan kelompok digunakan sebagai strategi untuk menanggapi suatu penyakit [[Kejadian Luar Biasa|wabah]], apalagi pandemi. " <ref name="GuardianTedros"/><ref name="WHOTedros" /><ref>{{Cite news|last=Lovett|first=Samuel|date=13 October 2020|title=Pursuit of herd immunity is 'unethical,' says WHO head|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-vaccine-cases-herd-immunity-who-lockdown-latest-b1010990.html|work=The Independent|language=en|access-date=2020-10-13}}</ref>
[[Berkas:Anthony_Fauci_2020.jpg|kiri|jmpl| Pakar penyakit menular Amerika Serikat Anthony Fauci menyebut proposal dalam Deklarasi Great Barrington "tidak masuk akal dan sangat berbahaya".<ref name="Fox1510">{{Cite news|last=Rivas|first=Kayla|date=15 October 2020|title=Fauci calls coronavirus herd immunity approach 'nonsense, very dangerous'|url=https://www.foxnews.com/health/fauci-coronavirus-herd-immunity-great-barrington-declaration-nonsense|work=Fox News|access-date=17 October 2020}}</ref>]]
Baris 52:
Memorandum John Snow, yang diterbitkan dalam ''[[The Lancet]]'',<ref>{{Cite web|title=John Snow Memorandum|url=https://www.johnsnowmemo.com/|access-date=2020-10-15}}</ref> adalah tanggapan dari 80 peneliti (yang merupakan "ahli dari dunia epidemiologi, penyakit menular dan vaksinasi") yang mengecam pendekatan imunitas kelompok dari Deklarasi Great Barrington.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Triggle|first=Nick|last2=Mason|first2=Chris|last3=Hamilton|first3=Claire|date=2020-10-17|title=Covid: What the tier rules say about the split between science and politics|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54546867|work=BBC News|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-10-17}}</ref> Memorandum ini mengambil namanya dari [[John Snow]], ahli epidemiologi yang bekerja pada [[1854 Wabah kolera Broad Street|wabah kolera di Jalan Broad tahun 1854]],<ref name="usatoday1410" /><ref name=":11">{{Cite journal|title=Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now|url=https://www.thelancet.com/lancet/article/s0140-6736(20)32153-x|journal=The Lancet|access-date=2020-10-15}}</ref> menyatakan bahwa gagasan kekebalan kelompok adalah "kekeliruan berbahaya yang tidak didukung oleh bukti ilmiah".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Finucane|first=Martin|date=14 October 2020|title=Boston researchers join letter in The Lancet rejecting herd immunity strategy|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/14/nation/boston-researchers-join-letter-lancet-rejecting-herd-immunity-strategy/|work=The Boston Globe|access-date=18 October 2020}}</ref> Ia mengakui bahwa pembatasan virus korona telah menyebabkan demoralisasi dan kerusakan mental, sehingga membuat gagasan seperti itu menarik, tetapi menyatakan bahwa "tidak ada bukti kekebalan kelompok yang langgeng terhadap SARS-CoV-2", menambahkan bahwa "strategi seperti itu tidak akan mengarah pada akhir COVID-19, tetapi malah mengakibatkan epidemi berulang, seperti yang terjadi pada banyak penyakit menular sebelum munculnya vaksinasi."
 
Penulis surat tersebut dikoordinasikan oleh Deepti Gurdasani, ahli epidemiologi klinis di [[Queen Mary, Universitas London|Queen Mary University of London]],<ref>{{Cite web|title=Herd immunity in COVID-19 control is a dangerous fallacy, say authors of open letter|url=https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2020/smd/herd-immunity-in-covid-19-control-is-a-dangerous-fallacy-say-authors-of-open-letter.html|website=Queen Mary University of London|language=en|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref><ref name=":15">{{Cite web|date=15 October 2020|title=SARS-CoV-2: Experten streiten über Herdenimmunität als Strategie|url=https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/117444/SARS-CoV-2-Experten-streiten-ueber-Herdenimmunitaet-als-Strategie|website=Deutsches Ärzteblatt|language=de|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> dan termasuk Marc Lipsitch, William Hanage,<ref>{{Cite news|last=Cunningham|first=Paige Winfield|date=16 October 2020|title=Analysis {{!}} The Health 202: Health officials call an anti-lockdown paper 'dangerous.' Its authors say they just want the idea debated.|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/10/16/health-202-health-officials-call-an-anti-lockdown-paper-dangerous-its-authors-say-they-just-want-idea-debated/|work=[[The Washington Post]]|language=en-US|issn=0190-8286|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref><ref name="BostonGlobe">{{Cite news|last=Finucane|first=Martin|date=14 October 2020|title=Boston researchers join letter in The Lancet rejecting herd immunity strategy|url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/14/nation/boston-researchers-join-letter-lancet-rejecting-herd-immunity-strategy/|work=The Boston Globe|access-date=18 October 2020}}<cite class="citation news cs1" data-ve-ignore="true" id="CITEREFFinucane2020">Finucane, Martin (14 October 2020). [https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/10/14/nation/boston-researchers-join-letter-lancet-rejecting-herd-immunity-strategy/ "Boston researchers join letter in The Lancet rejecting herd immunity strategy"]. ''The Boston Globe''<span class="reference-accessdate">. Retrieved <span class="nowrap">18 October</span> 2020</span>.</cite></ref> Nahid Bhadelia, Isabella Eckerle,<ref name=":16">{{Cite web|last=Lancet/jdp|title=Swiss health experts sign letter wary of herd immunity claims|url=https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-health-experts-sign-letter-wary-of-herd-immunity-claims/46098370|website=Swissinfo|publisher=Swiss Broadcasting Corporation|language=en|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> Emma Hodcroft, Martin McKee,<ref name=":17">{{Cite web|last=McKee|first=Martin|last2=Stuckler|first2=David|date=2020-10-15|title=Scientific divisions on covid-19: not what they might seem|url=https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/10/15/scientific-divisions-on-covid-19-not-what-they-might-seem/|website=The BMJ|language=en-gb|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> Dominic Pimenta,<ref>{{Cite web|last=Pimenta|first=Dominic|date=15 October 2020|title=Herd immunity could cost hundreds of thousands of lives|url=http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2020/10/15/a-herd-immunity-theory-could-cost-hundreds-of-thousands-of-l|website=politics.co.uk|language=en|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201018141633/https://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2020/10/15/a-herd-immunity-theory-could-cost-hundreds-of-thousands-of-l|archive-date=18 October 2020|access-date=2020-10-18|url-status=dead}}</ref> Viola Priesemann, Devi Sridhar,<ref>{{Cite web|date=15 October 2020|title=Herd immunity approaches to control Covid-19 'a dangerous fallacy', say scientists – ET HealthWorld|url=https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/diagnostics/herd-immunity-approaches-to-control-covid-19-a-dangerous-fallacy-say-scientists/78681234|website=Health World, Economic Times|language=en|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> Gavin Yamey,<ref>{{Cite web|last=Ahemed|first=Nafeez|date=14 October 2020|title=How the White House's Herd Immunity Strategy Would Destroy the US Economy|url=https://bylinetimes.com/2020/10/15/how-the-white-houses-herd-immunity-strategy-would-destroy-the-us-economy/|website=Byline Times|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-10-18}}</ref> dan Rochelle Walensky.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Alwan|first=Nisreen A|last2=Burgess|first2=Rochelle Ann|last3=Ashworth|first3=Simon|last4=Beale|first4=Rupert|last5=Bhadelia|first5=Nahid|last6=Bogaert|first6=Debby|last7=Dowd|first7=Jennifer|last8=Eckerle|first8=Isabella|last9=Goldman|first9=Lynn R|date=15 October 2020|title=Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now|url=https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32153-X|journal=The Lancet|volume=396|issue=10260|pages=e71–e72|doi=10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32153-x|issn=0140-6736|pmc=7557300|pmid=33069277}}</ref>
 
== Referensi ==
Baris 58:
 
<references responsive="" />
 
{{Uncategorized|date=Januari 2023}}
 
[[Kategori:Respons terhadap pandemi koronavirus]]
Diperoleh dari "https://wiki-indonesia.club/wiki/Deklarasi_Barrington_Raya"