Calvin and Hobbes: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
JThorneBOT (bicara | kontrib) →Referensi: clean up, removed: {{Link FA|it}} |
Wagino Bot (bicara | kontrib) k →Sindikasi dan standar seni Watterson: minor cosmetic change |
||
Baris 70:
To this day, my syndicate assures me that some editors liked the new format, appreciated the difference, and were happy to run the larger strip, but I think it's fair to say that this was not the most common reaction. The syndicate had warned me to prepare for numerous cancellations of the Sunday feature, but after a few weeks of dealing with howling, purple-faced editors, the syndicate suggested that papers could reduce the strip to the size tabloid newspapers used for their smaller sheets of paper. … I focused on the bright side: I had complete freedom of design and there were virtually no cancellations.
For all the yelling and screaming by outraged editors, I remain convinced that the larger Sunday strip gave newspapers a better product and made the comics section more fun for readers. Comics are a visual medium. A strip with a lot of drawing can be exciting and add some variety. Proud as I am that I was able to draw a larger strip, I don't expect to see it happen again any time soon. In the newspaper business, space is money, and I suspect most editors would still say that the difference is not worth the cost. Sadly, the situation is a vicious circle: because there's no room for better artwork, the comics are simply drawn; because they're simply drawn, why should they have more room?<ref name="sundaypages">{{cite book |
''Calvin and Hobbes'' tetap sangat populer setelah perubahan tersebut, sehingga Watterson dapat memperluas gaya dan tekniknya untuk strip hari Minggu tanpa kehilangan pekerjaannya.
| |||