Bantuan:Pelepasan templat pemeliharaan: Perbedaan antara revisi

Template pemeliharaan tersebut adalah ditambahkan atau dilepaskan oleh para kontributor. Beberapa dari templat-templat pemeliharaan yang disematkan pada suatu halaman ataupun artikel, akan mengarahkannya kepada berbagai kategori pelacakan ataupun kategori yang digunakan untuk pemeliharaan artikel [[Wikipedia Bahasa Indonesia]]. Anda dapat menemukannya seperti pada [[:Kategori:Pemeliharaan Wikipedia]], dan mungkin juga Anda dapat berkontribusi melakukan pemeliharaan artikel-artikel tersebut sehingga menjadi artikel-artikel yang lebih baik menurut dibawah kebijakan dan pedoman Wikipedia. Halaman bantuan ini berisi informasi yang menjelaskan proses untuk memeriksa dan menghapus templat tersebut.

</div></center>{{clear}}

'''ClickKlik "showtampilkan" atpada thebagian rightkanan tountuk displaymenampilkan the instructionsinstruksinya.'''

{{hidden begin|title={{tlx|MultipleArtikel issuesbermasalah}}|bg1=wheat|border = 1px solid grey|extra1 = font-size:larger;}}

{{hidden begin|title={{tlx|UnreferencedTanpa referensi}}|bg1=wheat|border = 1px solid grey|extra1 = font-size:larger;}}

<!--All of Wikipedia's core content policies and guidelines have as a common denominator the need for reliable sourcing. For example, the content of Wikipedia articles must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] in [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]]; the [[WP:N|notability]] of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are ''[[WP:SECONDARY|secondary]]'' in nature, which are ''[[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]]'' of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail (not just "mere mentions"); and in order to establish that the content is not [[WP:OR|original research]], the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources.-->

{{tlx|UnreferencedTanpa referensi}}, typicallybiasanya placedditampilkan byoleh the codekode <code><nowiki>{{UnreferencedTanpa referensi|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, havingmemiliki redirectspengalihan/alias suchseperti as <nowiki>{{tl|Unsourced}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Unverifiedtl|Referensi}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{No referencestl|Noref}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{No sourcestl|Unreferenced}}</nowiki>, anddan <nowiki>{{Unreftl|rujukan}}</nowiki>, anddan displayingmemberikan whentampilan readingpada assaat membaca artikel seperti:

{{UnreferencedTanpa referensi|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

flagsTanda theterkait issueisu ofdalam ansuatu articleartikel containingyang tersematkan ''noTanpa referencesreferensi'' at all. ThisTemplate templateini notidak longerlagi appliesberlaku oncesetelah areferensi singletunggal referencemuncul appearsdi in the articleartikel, whether placed through the preferred method of [[:en:Wikipedia:Inline citation|''inline citations'']], ones appearing in a [[WP:GENREF|general references]] section, or even through such a poor method as including an [[Wikipedia:Citing sources#Avoid embedded links|embedded raw link]].

ToUntuk addressmengatasi themasalah issue,ini '''addtambahkan citationssitasi tokepada reliablesumber sourcesterpercaya'''. BecauseKarena ofpentingnya theirhal importanceitu, Wikipedia containsmemuat numerousbanyak instructionhalaman pageskebijakan ondan aspectspedoman oftentang referencingaspek referensi. We suggest starting with [[:en:Help:Referencing for beginners]] and [[:en:Help:Introduction to referencing/1]], anddan thenlihat seeingpula [[Wikipedia:CitingKutip sourcessumber tulisan]] for auntuk morepenyelesaian involvedhal treatmentterkait, notingdicatatkan thatpula eachbahwa containsbagian see"Lihat alsopula" sections linkingadalah tomemberikan additionalpranala helpkepada pageshalaman bantuan, guideskebijakan, andpedoman tutorialsmaupun tutorial. APanduan visual guideuntuk tomenempatkan placingkutipan inlinesebaris citations throughdengan <code><nowiki><ref> ... </ref></nowiki></code> tagstag-tag mayjuga alsomungkin helpakan membantu, andyang ada appearsdibagian belowbawah.

|title = VisualPetunjuk inline[[:en:Wikipedia:Inline citation|''inline citations'']] antar muka guide

|+ ''Formatting references'' usingmenggunakan [[:en:Wikipedia:Inline citation|''inline citations'']]

| colspan=2 | <small>AllSemua informationinformasi inpada artikel Wikipedia articles should beseharusnya [[Wikipedia:VerificationPemastian|verifieddapat diverifikasi]] bydengan [[Wikipedia:CitingKutip sourcessumber tulisan|citationssitasi]] tokepada [[Wikipedia:ReliableSumber sourcesterpercaya|reliableSumber sourcesterpercaya]]. OurMetode preferredyang methodterpilih ofuntuk citationmemberikan issitasi usingadalah thedengan menggunakan <span class="plainlinks">"[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite/Cite.php cite.php]"</span> form ofbentuk ''inline citations'', usingdengan themenggunakan elemen <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> elements. UsingPenggunaan thismetode methodini, eachsetiap timekali asumber particulartertentu source'''ditambang''' isuntuk mined for informationinformasi (''don'tjangan copysalin wordkata-forper-wordkata''!), acatatan footnotekaki isditempatkan placedpada insetiap the textteks/kalimat/baris ("''inline''"), thatyang takesakan onemengarahkan tokepada thesuatu detailrincian/keterangan oflanjutan thekepada sourcesumber whenpada clickedsaat di-klik, setkemudian forthdituangkan/disajikan in a referencespada [[HelpBantuan:SectionBagian|sectionbagian]] afterreferensi berupa daftar (''references'') setelah theteks textyang ofada thepada articleartikel.</small><p><small>

| <small>'''''Kode [[:en:Wikipedia:Footnotes|Inline citation|''inline citations'']] code; what youketika typeanda inklik 'editsunting modesumber''''''</small>

| <small>'''''WhatTampilan ithasil producessetelah when you savetersimpan'''''</small>

| style="width: 400px;"|Two separate citations.<span style="color: #002BB8;"><nowiki><ref></nowiki></span><code>{{xt|CitationTeks textsitasi.}}</code><span style="color: #002BB8;"><nowiki></ref><ref></nowiki></span><code>{{xt|CitationTeks text2sitasi2.}}</code><span style="color: #002BB8;"><nowiki></ref></nowiki></span><p><br />Multiple<span style="color: #002BB8;"><nowiki><ref name="multiple"></nowiki></span><code>{{Xt|CitationTeks text3sitasi3.}}</code><span style="color: #002BB8;"><nowiki></ref></nowiki></span>citation<span style="color: #002BB8;"><nowiki><ref name="multiple" /></nowiki></span> use.<span style="color: #002BB8;"><nowiki><ref name="multiple" /></nowiki></span><p><br />== ReferencesReferensi ==<p><nowiki>{{Reflist}}</nowiki>

| style="width: 400px;"|Two separate citations.<ref>CitationTeks textsitasi.</ref><ref>CitationTeks text2sitasi2.</ref><p><br /><br /> Multiple<ref name="multiple">CitationTeks text3sitasi3.</ref> citation<ref name="multiple" /> use.<ref name="multiple" /><p><u style="font-size: larger;"><br /><br /><br />'''ReferencesReferensi'''_________________</u><p>{{Reflist}}

| style="text-align: center;" colspan="2" | <small>TemplatesTemplate thatdapat candigunakan bediantara used betweentag <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> tags tountuk format referencesreferensi dalam daftar</small><p>{{tl|Citation}} • {{tl|Cite web}} • {{tl|Cite book}} • {{tl|Cite news}} • {{tl|Cite journal}} • [[:CategoryKategori:CitationTemplat templatessitasi|Otherslainnya]] • [[Wikipedia:CitationTemplat templatesSitasi|ExamplesContoh]]

{{Hidden end}} <!--{{Z3}}-->

<!--As noted [[Help:Maintenance template removal#Changing to a different template|higher on this page]], unless you thoroughly source a page in response to this template, it may more appropriate to switch this template with a more specific one rather than simply removing it. Depending on the type, quality, depth and manner of sourcing added to fix the issue, you might replace it with {{tlx|refimprove}}, {{tlx|No footnotes}}, {{tlx|Primary sources}} or a host of others listed at [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles]].-->

<!--All of Wikipedia's core content policies and guidelines have as a common denominator the need for reliable sourcing. For example, the content of Wikipedia articles must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] in [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]]; the [[WP:N|notability]] of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are ''[[WP:SECONDARY|secondary]]'' in nature, which are ''[[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]]'' of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail (not just "mere mentions"); and in order to establish that the content is not [[WP:OR|original research]], the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources.-->

<!--{{tlx|Refimprove}}, typically placed by the code <code><nowiki>{{Refimprove|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, having redirects such as <nowiki>{{Improve references}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Verify}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{More sources}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{Citations needed}}</nowiki>, and displaying when reading as:-->

<!--flags the issue of an article that has some, but ''insufficient'' inline citations to support the material currently in the article. It should not be used for articles with no sources at all ({{tlx|unreferenced}} should be used instead), nor for articles without inline citations but which contain some sources ({{tlx|No footnotes}} should be used instead), nor for article on [[WP:BLP|living persons]] ({{tlx|BLP sources}} should be used instead). This template no longer applies once an article has been made fairly well sourced.-->

<!--To address the issue, '''add additional inline citations to reliable sources''' for all significant statements in the article. Whether or not an article has been rendered "fairly well sourced" may involve a judgement call, but in any event, the sources used must be [[WP:IRS|reliable]] ones, and articles should not rely predominantly on [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]], but rather on [[WP:SECONDARY|secondary]] sources. Note the ''minimum'': all quotations, material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, and contentious material, whether negative, positive, or neutral, about living persons, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material.-->

<!--All of Wikipedia's core content policies and guidelines have as a common denominator the need for reliable sourcing. For example, the content of Wikipedia articles must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] in [[WP:IRS|reliable sources]]; the [[WP:N|notability]] of a topic demonstrated through such reliable sources that are ''[[WP:SECONDARY|secondary]]'' in nature, which are ''[[WP:INDEPENDENT|independent]]'' of the topic and treat the subject in substantive detail (not just "mere mentions"); and in order to establish that the content is not [[WP:OR|original research]], the sources cited must directly support the material being presented without analysis or synthesis to reach or imply a conclusion that is not stated in the sources.-->

<!--{{tlx|No footnotes}}, typically placed by the code <code><nowiki>{{No footnotes|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, and having redirects such as <nowiki>{{Citations}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{No citations}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Inline citations}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{No inline citations}}</nowiki>, and displaying when reading as:-->

<!--flags the issue of an article that contains some form of sourcing but lacks the precision of [[WP:IC|inline citations]] to associate given portions of material with specific reliable source(s) that support that material. Inline citations make [[WP:V|verifiability]] accessible. In short, in the absence of an inline citation that associates specific material to a specific source, it becomes very difficult for a reader to check what sources, given in only some general manner, verify what items of content.-->

<!--To address the issue, '''add inline citations to reliable sources''', ideally for all significant statements in the article. Note that at a ''minimum'': all quotations, material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, and contentious material, whether negative, positive, or neutral, about living persons, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material.

{{Hidden end}} -->

<!--{{tlx|Primary sources}}, typically placed by the code <code><nowiki>{{Primary sources|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, having among other redirects <nowiki>{{Primary}}</nowiki>, and displaying when reading as: -->

<!--flags the issue of an article that too heavily relies on [[Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources|primary sources]] – original materials that are close to an event; often accounts written by people who are directly involved – as opposed to [[WP:SECONDARY|secondary]], and to some extent, [[tertiary source]]s. Primary sources have their place but they must be used carefully and are easy to misuse. Typically, they should only be used for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. They should not be used to support content that presents interpretation, analysis, evaluation, or synthesis, and should not be the predominant form of sourcing in an article. Moreover, primary sources are generally not useful to demonstrate a topic's [[WP:N|notability]].

Finding secondary sources is a large topic but make use of Google Books, News and Scholar; find local newspaper archives; go to a library; if you have access, use pay/subscription services like JSTOR, Newspaperarchive.com; Ancestry.com, etc.; see our guide on [[WP:FENS|free English newspaper sources]] and others listed [[Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/Navbox|here]]; request access to pay/prescription sources at [[WP:RX]]. If insufficient reliable secondary and independent sources exist treating a topic in substantive detail, then Wikipedia should not have an article on the topic. Remember that [[Wikipedia:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability|no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability]]. -->

{{hidden begin|title={{tlx|NotabilityKelayakan}}|bg1=wheat|border = 1px solid grey|extra1 = font-size:larger;}}

<!--Wikipedia is an [[WP:ENC|encyclopedia]], a specific type of reference work properly containing articles on topics of knowledge. Wikipedia employs the concept of [[WP:N|notability]] to avoid [[WP:IINFO|indiscriminate inclusion]] of topics by attempting to ensure that the subjects of articles are "worthy of notice" – by only including articles on topics that the world has taken ''note'' of by substantively treating them in reliable sources unconnected with the topic.

{{tlx|Notability}}, typically placed by the code <code><nowiki>{{Notability|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, having redirects such as <nowiki>{{Notable}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Non-notable}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Nn}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{Significance}}</nowiki>, and displaying when reading as:-->

{{NotabilityKelayakan|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

<!--(or some variation linking to one of the [[:Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines|subject-specific notability guidelines]]) questions whether a topic is notable. As stated in the template, addressing the issue requires adding citations to reliable secondary sources. There are a number of common mistakes seen in addressing this issue:

To address the issue, rewrite the article from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] – which is not just about the wording and tone but also as to what the article covers and what it ''does not cover''. Wikipedia articles should represent fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|published by reliable sources]] on a topic. Removing all promotional language is a good start but depending on what is left, may only be a surface treatment. See what you can salvage but often there is little alternative but to strip out all content that is not reliably sourced, leaving it in a [[WP:STUB|stub]] state. The ideal, of course, is to explore the existence of sourcing for the topic and build from the ground up.-->

{{hidden begin|title={{tlx|POVTak netral}}|bg1=wheat|border = 1px solid grey|extra1 = font-size:larger;}}

<!--{{tlx|POV}}, typically placed by the code <code><nowiki>{{POV|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, and having redirects such as <nowiki>{{NPOV}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{POV dispute}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Neutrality}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Neutral}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{Not neutral}}</nowiki>, and displaying when reading as:-->

{{POVTak netral|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

<!--flags the issue of an article that has been identified as having a serious issue of balance, the lack of a [[WP:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and the tagger wishes to attract editors with different viewpoints to the article. An unbalanced or non-neutral article is one that does not fairly represent the balance of perspectives of high-quality, reliable [[secondary sources]]. This tag is meant to be accompanied by an explanation on the article's talk page about why it was added, identifying specific issues that are actionable within Wikipedia's content policies.

# In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant. -->

{{hidden begin|title={{tlx|LeadParagraf missingpembuka}}|bg1=wheat|border = 1px solid grey|extra1 = font-size:larger;}}

<!--{{tlx|Lead missing}}, typically placed by the code <code><nowiki>{{Lead missing|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, and having redirects such as <nowiki>{{No lead}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Nointro}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{No lead section}}</nowiki>, <nowiki>{{Lead absent}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{Intro needed}}</nowiki>, and displaying when reading as:-->

{{LeadParagraf missingpembuka|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

<!--flags the issue of an article that fails to follow Wikipedia's standard [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|article layout guidelines]] by introducing the reader to the topic in a [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead section]] containing a summary of the most important article contents. The lead should stand on its own as a concise overview of the article's topic. A good lead section cultivates the reader's interest in reading more of the article, but not by teasing the reader or hinting at content that follows. It should identify the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is [[WP:N|notable]], and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies.

To address the issue, write a lead section. The size of an appropriate lead will depend on the breadth of the article but it should be no more than four well-composed paragraphs, and should generally not contain content that is not already present in the body of the article. -->

{{hidden begin|title={{tlx|CurrentAktualitas}}|bg1=wheat|border = 1px solid grey|extra1 = font-size:larger;}}

<!--{{tlx|Current}}, typically placed by the code <code><nowiki>{{Current|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, and displaying when reading as:-->

{{CurrentAktualitas|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}

<!--(or a subject-specific variation listed on [[Wikipedia:Current event templates]]) warns editors and readers about an article that is the subject of a current event, such as a [[WP:RSBREAKING|breaking news story]], that is accordingly experiencing a great flux of edits and is in a fast-changing state. Wikipedia attracts numerous editors who want to update articles in real time immediately after such current events are published. However, sources to breaking news reports often contain serious inaccuracies, and so these templates can also draw attention to the need to add improved sources as soon as they become available.

The template should generally be removed when the event described is no longer receiving massive editing attention. It is not meant to be a [[Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles|general disclaimer]] indicating that an article's contents may not be accurate, or to mark an article that merely has recent news articles about the topic (if it were, hundreds of thousands of articles would have the <nowiki>{{Current}}</nowiki> template, with no informational consequence). If the article continues to have sourcing or cleanup issues, a more appropriate maintenance template should be used instead.-->

{{hidden begin|title={{tlx|linkrotPranala mati}}|bg1=wheat|border = 1px solid grey|extra1 = font-size:larger;}}

{{tlx|linkrotPranala mati}}, typicallybiasanya placedditampilkan byoleh thepenggunaan codekode <code><nowiki>{{linkrotPranala mati|date=</nowiki>{{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code>, anddan displayingtampilan whenhasil pada saat membaca halaman/artikel readingadalah asseperti:

{{linkrotPranala mati|date={{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}