Revisi per 3 November 2018 05.32 lihat sumber 182.1.172.16 (bicara) Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan Tag: Suntingan perangkat seluler Suntingan peramban seluler ← Revisi sebelumnya		Revisi per 3 November 2018 05.32 lihat sumber 182.1.172.16 (bicara) Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan Tag: Suntingan perangkat seluler Suntingan peramban seluler Revisi selanjutnya →
Baris 15: {{anchor\|Use common sense\|Gunakan akal sehat}} ~~== Gunakan akal sehat ==~~ ~~{{Shortcut\|WP:AKALSEHAT\|WP:GAS}}~~ Wikipedia has many policies or what many consider "rules". Instead of following every rule, it is acceptable to '''use [[common sense]]''' as you go about editing. Being too wrapped up in rules can cause loss of perspective, so there are times when it is better to ignore a rule. Even if a contribution "violates" the precise wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution. Similarly, just because something is not forbidden in a written document, or is even explicitly permitted, doesn't mean it's a good idea in the given situation. Our goal is to improve Wikipedia so that it better informs readers. Being able to articulate "common sense" reasons why a change helps the encyclopedia is good, and editors should not ignore those reasons because they don't include a bunch of policy shortcuts. The ''principle'' of the rules—to make Wikipedia and its sister projects thrive—is more important than the letter. [[Wikipedia:Editorial discretion\|Editors must use their best judgment]]. ~~'''Why isn't "use common sense" an official policy?''' It doesn't need to be; as a fundamental principle, it is above any policy.~~ ~~{{anchor\|No common sense}}~~ ~~=== There is no common sense ===~~ ~~{{Shortcut\|WP:NOCOMMON}}~~ {{quote\|Good sense is of all things in the world the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks he is so well supplied with it that even those most difficult to please in all other matters never desire more of it than they already possess.\|[[René Descartes]]<ref> {{ Cite book \| last=Descartes \| first=René \| title=[[Discourse on the Method\|Le Discours de la Méthode]]\| year=1637 \| at=Part I, incipit \| quote= ''Le bon sens est la chose du monde la mieux partagée; car chacun pense en être si bien pourvu, que ceux même qui sont les plus difficiles à contenter en toute autre chose n'ont point coutume d'en désirer plus qu'ils en ont.''}}</ref>}} When advancing a position or justifying an action, base your argument on [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines\|existing agreements]], [[Meta:Community foundation issues\|community foundation issues]], and the {{em\|interests of the encyclopedia}}, not your own common sense. Exhorting another editor to "just use common sense" is likely to be taken as insulting, for good reasons. If in a particular case you feel that literally following a rule harms the encyclopedia, or that doing something which the rules technically allow degrades it, then instead of telling someone who disagrees to use common sense, just focus on explaining why ignoring the rules will improve Wikipedia in that instance. Be careful about citing this principle too aggressively. While it's quite acceptable to explain your own actions by saying, "it seemed like [[WP:COMMON\|common sense]] to me", you should be careful not to imply that other editors are {{em\|lacking}} in common sense, which may be seen as [[Wikipedia:Civility\|uncivil]]. [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians\|Wikipedians]] come from diverse ethnic, religious, political, cultural and ideological backgrounds and have vastly different perceptions. Other editors are likely to ascribe very different meanings and values to words and concepts than you, so try to state your arguments as fully as possible. Citing concrete [[WP:policies and guidelines\|policies and guidelines]] is likely to be more effective than simply citing "common sense" and leaving it at that. == Diagram dan kotak alur ==

Wikipedia:Apa maksud "Jangan terbebani aturan": Perbedaan antara revisi