Markus 6: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
JohnThorne (bicara | kontrib) |
k Perubahan kosmetik tanda baca |
||
Baris 133:
|postscript=<!--None-->
}}. "Secara umum, tesis O'Callaghan disambut dengan skeptik karena fragmen ini kecil dan hampir tak terbaca, dan sulit dicocokkan dengan versi Injil Markus yang ada."
</ref><ref>"... Qumran ms. 7Q5 ... is captioned as if it contains a fragment of Mark: it was of course O’Callaghan who made that controversial — and now virtually universally rejected - identication of this Dead Sea text as a piece of the New Testament ..." Elliot (2004), JK, ''Book Notes'', Novum Testamentum, Volume 45, Number 2, 2003
|first=Robert H.
|last=Gundry
| |||