Revisi per 14 Februari 2006 21.36 sunting Stephensuleeman (bicara \| kontrib) 24.084 suntingan →Kebingungan dengan karya-karya lain ← Revisi sebelumnya		Revisi per 14 Februari 2006 21.43 sunting balikkan Stephensuleeman (bicara \| kontrib) 24.084 suntingan →Waktu penulisan Revisi selanjutnya →
Baris 22: <!--===~~The~~ ~~early~~Kubu awal ~~camp~~=== Kubu awal berpendapat bahwa kaerna isinya kebanyakan adalah bahan-bahan orisinal dan tampaknya tidak didasarkan pada injil-injil kanonik, Injil Tomas tentu telah ditulis berdasarkan suatu tradisi lisan. Karena praktik yang menganggap tradisi lisan berwibawa berakhir pada [[abad ke-1]], ''Injil Tomas'' tentunya telah ditulis sebelum masa itu, barangkali malah sekitar tahun [[40]]. Karena tanggal ini lebih awal daripada tanggal-tanggap penulisan keempat injil yang tradisional, ada sejumlah klaim bahwa Injil Tomas adalah [[dokumen Q\|Injil Q]]—atau mempunyai kaitan dengannya. Injil Q adalah sebuah teks (atau versi lisan) teoretis yang diduga telah menyebar ke dalam bagian-bagian dari Injil Matius dan Luas yang dikenal sekarang, dan yang dalam cara tertentu tidak menyalin dari Injil Markus. The early camp argues that since it consists of mostly original material and does not seem to be based on the canonical gospels, it must have been transcribed from an oral tradition. Since the practice of considering oral tradition as authoritative ended during the [[1st century]], the ''Gospel of Thomas'' therefore must have been written before then, perhaps as early as around [[40]]. Since this date antecedes the dates of the traditional four gospels, there is some claim that the Gospel of Thomas is or has some connection to the [[Q document\|Q gospel]] —the name for an unknown, theorised text (or oral verse) which may have spawned the parts of the gospels of Matthew and Luke known today which don't duplicate in some manner the Gospel of Mark. <!--The early camp argues that about half of the material in Thomas has no known parallels to the New Testament, and at least some of this material could plausibly be attributed to the [[historical Jesus]], such as saying 42 "Be passers-by." The early camp also notes that Q is almost universally regarded by secular biblical scholars as the most [[parsimonious explanation]] for the [[synoptic problem]] and is widely regarded to be the earliest written text of Jesus' teachings. It has been hypothesized that Q exists in 3 strata, termed Q1, Q2, and Q3, with the apocalyptic material belonging in Q2 and Q3. Secular biblical scholars have identified 37 sayings that overlap between Thomas and Q, all of which are conjectured to be in either Q1 or Q2 and none of which included the latter, apocalyptic material of Q3. Hence, Thomas shows little or no knowledge of Q3, did not incorporate or was not aware of Q3. The Q layers of Q1 and Q2 are thought to predate the four gospels. Hence the Gospel of Thomas is thought to be early.

Injil Tomas: Perbedaan antara revisi