Prakarsa Sabuk dan Jalan: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
+ |
|||
Baris 49:
{{Reflist
|refs =
<ref name=comp2>
Compare: {{cite web |url = http://www.ejinsight.com/20160412-getting-lost-one-belt-one-road/ |title= Getting lost in 'One Belt, One Road' |date= 12 April 2016 |publisher= Hong Kong Economic Journal |language= en-US |access-date= 13 April 2016 |quote = Simply put, China is trying to buy friendship and political influence by investing massive amounts of money on infrastructure in countries along the 'One Belt, One Road'. |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160414014511/http://www.ejinsight.com/20160412-getting-lost-one-belt-one-road/ |archive-date= 14 April 2016 |url-status = live }}
</ref>
<ref name=comp1>
Compare:
{{cite paper
| ssrn= 2997650
| title= What Is One Belt One Road? A Surplus Recycling Mechanism Approach
| date= 7 July 2017
| quote = It has been lauded as a visionary project among key participants such as China and Pakistan, but has received a critical reaction, arguably a poorly thought out one, in nonparticipant countries such as the United States and India (see various discussions in Ferdinand 2016, Kennedy and Parker 2015, Godement and Kratz, 2015, Li 2015, Rolland 2015, Swaine 2015).
| last1= Chohan
| first1= Usman W.
}}
</ref>
<ref name="centralGovernment">{{cite web
|title=China unveils action plan on Belt and Road Initiative
|agency = [[Xinhua News Agency|Xinhua]]
|url = http://english.gov.cn/news/top_news/2015/03/28/content_281475079055789.htm
|website= Gov.cn
|date= 28 March 2015
|access-date=16 April 2018
}}</ref>
<ref name=what>
| |||