Eupolemus: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
JohnThorne (bicara | kontrib) |
JohnThorne (bicara | kontrib) |
||
Baris 30:
* The account concludes by indicating that the Greeks relate that [[Atlas (mythology)|Atlas]] discovered astrology but that Atlas is really Enoch and that Enoch learned from the angels of God.
R. Doran mengemukakan alasan untuk meyakini bahwa fragmen ini mungkin adalah bagian dari karya asli Eupolemus meskipun ada keraguan seperti disebutkan di atas.<ref>Cf also Łukasz Niesiołowski-Spano, (Pseudo-)Eupolemus and Shechem: Methodology Enabling the Use of Hellenistic Jewish Historians' Work in Biblical Studies, in: Lester L. Grabbe (ed.), Enquire of the Former Age. Ancient Historiography and Writing the History of Israel (ESHM 9; LHB/OTS 554), New York: T & T Clark 2011, 77-96</ref>▼
-->
▲R. Doran mengemukakan alasan untuk meyakini bahwa fragmen ini mungkin adalah bagian dari karya asli Eupolemus meskipun ada keraguan seperti disebutkan di atas.<ref>Cf also Łukasz Niesiołowski-Spano, (Pseudo-)Eupolemus and Shechem: Methodology Enabling the Use of Hellenistic Jewish Historians' Work in Biblical Studies, in: Lester L. Grabbe (ed.), Enquire of the Former Age. Ancient Historiography and Writing the History of Israel (ESHM 9; LHB/OTS 554), New York: T & T Clark 2011, 77-96</ref>
==Referensi==
| |||