Literalisme biblis: Perbedaan antara revisi

== Kejelasan teks ==<!--

TheMayoritas vastumat majorityKristen ofinjili evangelicaldan andfundamentalis fundamentalist Christians regardmenganggap [[ClarityKejelasan ofkitab scripturesuci|theteks Biblical textAlkitab asitu clearjelas]], andserta believepercaya thatbahwa therata-rata averageorang persondapat maymemahami understandmakna thedasar basicdan meaningajaran-ajaran and teachings of the BibleAlkitab. Golongan Suchumat ChristiansKristen oftentersebut referkerap tomengacu thekepada teachingsajaran-ajaran ofAlkitab the Bible rather than toalih-alih thekepada [[exegesiseksegesis|processproses ofpenafsiran interpretationitu itselfsendiri]]. Doktrin Thekejelasan doctrineteks ofini claritytidak ofberarti thebahwa textprinsip-prinsip doespenafsiran notsudah meantidak thatdiperlukan nolagi, interpretativedan principlestidak arepula necessary,berarti orbahwa thattidak thereada iskesenjangan noantara gaplingkungan betweenbudaya thetempat cultureAlkitab indi whichditulis thedengan Biblelingkungan wasbudaya writtenseorang andpembaca thepada culture of azaman modern reader. OnSebaliknya theprinsip-prinsip contrary,eksegesis exegeticaldan andpenafsiran interpretativediberdayakan principlessebagai comebagian intodari playproses asmenghilangkan partkesenjangan ofbudaya the process of closing that cultural gaptersebut. TheDoktrin doctrineini doestidak denymenyangkal thatbahwa theAlkitab Bibleadalah issandi ayang code toharus decipherdiuraikan,<ref>{{Cite book | publisher = David C Cook | isbn = 9780781438773 | page = 26 | last1 = Zuck | first1 = Roy B | author-link1 = Roy B. Zuck | title = Basic Bible Interpretation: A Practical Guide to Discovering Biblical Truth | location = Colorado Springs | year = 2002 | orig-year = 1991 | quote = TheAjaran-ajaran teachingsAlkitab oftidaklah thetak Bibleterselami arerata-rata notorang, inaccessiblesebagaimana toanggapan thebeberapa averagepihak. person,Alkitab asjuga sometidak haveditulis suggested.sebagai Norsebuah issandi thesastra, Biblekitab writtenyang asberisi arahasia-rahasia puzzle,dan ateka-teki bookyang ofdijabarkan secretsdalam andformat riddlestak givenyang insengaja jumbleddiacak incommunicableagar formtidak dapat disebarluaskan.}}</ref> ordan thattidak understandingpula itmenyangkal requiresbahwa complexusaha academicmemahami analysisAlkitab asmemerlukan isanalisis typicalakademis inrumit theyang merupakan perkara lumrah di dalam metode tafsir [[historical-criticalmetode methodkritis-historis|kritis-historis]] of interpretation.{{citation needed|date=JanuaryJuli 20172021}}

[[File:Noahs Ark.jpg|thumb|BiblicalPara literalistsliteralis believebiblis thatpercaya thebahwa storyriwayat ofbahtera Noah's arkNuh (depictedseperti inyang thistergambar paintingdi bydalam lukisan karya [[Edward Hicks]] ini) isakurat historicallysecara accurate.historis]]

BiblicalPara literalistsliteralis believebiblis that,percaya unlessbahwa aAlkitab passageharus isditafsirkan clearlysebagai intendedpernyataan-pernyataan byharfiah the writer as allegorypenulisnya, poetry,kecuali ornas sometertentu otheryang genre,jelas thediniatkan Biblepenulisnya shouldmenjadi bealegori, interpretedpuisi, asatau literalragam statementssastra by the authorlainnya. <!-- Critics argue that allegorical intent can be ambiguous. Fundamentalists typically treat as simple history, according to its plain sense, passages such as those that recount the [[Genesis creation narrative|Genesis creation]], the [[Flood myth|deluge]] and [[Noah's ark]], and the unnaturally long life-spans of the patriarchs given in [[genealogies of Genesis]], as well as the strict historicity of the narrative accounts of [[Ancient Israel]], the [[supernatural]] interventions of [[God]] in history, and [[Miracles of Jesus|Jesus' miracles]].<ref>[http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/publications/knowingDoing/2004/Miracles.pdf#search=%22miracles%20C.S.Lewis%22 ''Lewis on Miracles''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080720041510/http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/publications/knowingDoing/2004/Miracles.pdf#search=%22miracles%20C.S.Lewis%22 |date=2008-07-20 }}, Art Lindsley, Knowing & Doing; A Teaching Quarterly for Discipleship of Heart and Mind: C.S. LEWIS INSTITUTE, Fall 2004</ref><ref>[http://www.icr.org/pdf/imp/imp-395.pdf#search=%22Genesis%20Flood%20Whitcomb%22 ''The History and Impact of the Book, The Genesis Flood''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060927101053/http://www.icr.org/pdf/imp/imp-395.pdf#search=%22Genesis%20Flood%20Whitcomb%22 |date=2006-09-27 }}, John C. Whitcomb, Impact, Number 395, May 2006</ref> Literalism does not deny that parables, metaphors and allegory exist in the Bible, but rather relies on contextual interpretations based on apparent authorial intention.<ref name=Chicago>[http://www.bible-researcher.com/chicago2.html ''Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics With commentary by Norman L. Geisler''], Reproduced from ''Explaining Hermeneutics: A Commentary on the Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics'', Oakland, California: International Council on Biblical Inerrancy, 1983. {{dead link|date=January 2017}}</ref>