Surat Jaminan Muhammad: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8 |
Tag: Dikembalikan kemungkinan menambah konten tanpa referensi atau referensi keliru Suntingan perangkat seluler Suntingan peramban seluler |
||
Baris 108:
{{Quote|Muhammad is supposed to have died in 632; the Muslims conquered Egypt between 639 and 641. The document says of the Christians, “No one shall bear arms against them.” So were the conquerors transgressing against Muhammad’s command[?]...Did Muhammad draw up this document because he foresaw the Muslim invasion of Egypt? There is no mention of this document in any remotely contemporary Islamic sources; among other anomalies, it bears a drawing of a mosque with a minaret, although minarets weren’t put on mosques until long after the time Muhammad is supposed to have lived, which is why Muslim hardliners consider them unacceptable innovation (bid’a)...The Achtiname, in short, bears all the earmarks of being an early medieval Christian forgery, perhaps developed by the monks themselves in order to protect the monastery and Egyptian Christians from the depredations of zealous Muslims.<ref>Spencer, Robert (January 26, 2014). "The Hypocrisy of the Huffington Post’s Praise of Muhammad". PJ Media. Retrieved 3 March 2016</ref>}}
Jaman sudah modern cukup di teliti kertas surat itu dari tahun berapa. Tulisan pun bisa diteliti dari tulisan siapa.apalagi ada jejak tangan...pasti ada dna dari si pemulis...dari pengmatan saya peneliti menyatakan kertas sesuai dan dna pun sama
== Referensi ==
| |||