Wikipedia:Tanya jawab (Lain-lain): Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
k Melindungi "Wikipedia:Tanya jawab (Lain-lain)": 4. Halaman dengan lalu lintas tinggi ([Sunting=Hanya untuk pengguna terdaftar otomatis] (kedaluwarsa 24 April 2021 16.33 (UTC)) [Pindahkan=Hanya untuk pengguna terdaftar otomatis] (kedaluwarsa 24 April 2021 16.33 (UTC))) |
per BPA : sintaks <br> dan <code> | t=2'425 su=321 in=387 at=326 -- only 78 edits left of totally 400 possible edits | edr=000-0001(!!!) ovr=010-1111 aft=000-0001 |
||
Baris 52:
==Is there any peer review process to validate the data that is displayed?==
: We are all peers here and we all review each other's work. All articles are thus subjected to constant critical review in one sense, but no formal ''approval'' process is currently a standard procedure. However, the Wikiculture is an introspective one and policy and guidelines are evolving continually.
: In the most general sense, registered wikipedians work within an area they define for themselves, and in technical areas like the sciences, social sciences, etc. there usually exists a large group of knowledgable editors with a long list of articles on their [[Wikipedia:watchlist]] armed with the powerful tool of [[Help:Page history]], to keep an eye on more expert content. There is no claim that this ad hoc system is foolproof, and attempts are being made constantly to improve upon it within the foundation goal of allowing open editing by anyone.
: In addition, potential page vandalism gets vigorous patrolling by experienced wikipedians monitoring special pages dedicated to watching recent changes, changes by anonymous editors, and changes by new editors. Together, these patrols catch most deliberate or naive editing within a short while of the misguided edit.
Baris 69:
:* When referring to individual editions of the project, each of which is usually described by its language, the ''edition'' takes an article. Example: ''the Romanian-language Wikipedia''.
:* When describing Wikipedia as one of many encyclopedias, reference works, or projects, an article is appropriate: "''the Wikipedia encyclopedia''", or "''the Wikipedia project''". In each case the article is attached to the common, not the proper noun (''the'' encyclopedia, ''the'' project). <small>(Similarly, note that we say "Britannica", but "the Encyclopædia Britannica" [''the'' applying there to ''Encyclopædia''] and "the [[Oxford English Dictionary|OED]]" [''the'' applying to '''''D'''ictionary''])</small>
:* When referring to one of these language editions, in comparison with other editions, an article is likewise used:
:* : "''The smallest Wikipedia''" = the smallest language edition of Wikipedia
==Why are some pages blue, and others white? ==
: Normal encyclopedia pages are white. In the classic skin, other pages ([[Wikipedia:talk page|talk page]]s, [[Wikipedia:User page|user page]]s) have a colored background to indicate that they don't contain encyclopedic content, but are about Wikipedia.
: Different skins use different colors, but in the current default skin (Monobook), there is no background color difference between namespaces.
Baris 83:
==When does an article warrant having its '''stub''' template removed?==
: The short answer is whenever you feel the article is no longer a [[Wikipedia:Stub|Stub]]. See [[Wikipedia:Find or fix a stub|Find or fix a stub]] for more info.
==What was the very first article?==
: While the first edit ever made is believed to be a test edit by [[Jimmy Wales|Jimbo]], Wikipedia's founder, the oldest article still preserved is, as documented at [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia's oldest articles]], the article [http://en.wiki-indonesia.club/w/wiki.phtml?title=UuU&oldid=291430 UuU]. It was created by the user [[User:Eiffel.demon.co.uk]] on [[16 January]] [[2001]], at 21:08 UTC. This was on the second day after the [[History of Wikipedia#Project beginnings|start of Wikipedia]].
==Where can I find more Wikipedia tips? ==
| |||