Penistaan agama: Perbedaan antara revisi

===Tujuan peraturan mengenai penistaan agama ===

Dalam beberapa negara dan kasus, peraturan ini ditegakkan untuk membatasi ancaman tindakan ataupun perkataan yang menyerang penganut agama mayoritas, sementara di negara lainnya, berfungsi sebagai perlindungan kepercayaan beragama untuk penganut minoritas.<ref name=IceNews/><ref name="Scolnicov2010">{{cite book|last=Scolnicov|first=Anat|title=The Right to Religious Freedom in International Law: Between Group Rights and Individual Rights|date=18 October 2010|publisher=Routledge|language=en|isbn=9781136907050|page=261|quote=A different argument for the retention of the offence of blasphemy (and for its extension to the protection of all religions in the UK [the offence protected only the majority religion]) has been offered by Parekh: a majority religion does not need the protection offered by an offence of blasphemy, but minority religions do because of their vulnerability in the face of the majority.}}</ref><ref name="The Copenhagen Post">{{cite news|url=http://cphpost.dk/news14/national-news14/danes-overwhelmingly-support-their-own-blasphemy-law.html|title=Danes overwhelmingly support their own blasphemy law|date=21 September 2012|newspaper=[[The Copenhagen Post]]|language=en|access-date=17 May 2016|quote=Denmark's own blasphemy law makes it an offence to "mock legal religions and faiths in Denmark", and according to a study carried out on behalf of the liberal think-tank CEPOS, 66 per cent of the 1,000 Danes questioned answered that the law should not be repealed.}}</ref> Walaupun dalam beberapa alasan, negara masih dapat memiliki suatu peraturan mengenai penistaan agama walaupun negara tersebut sudah melarang secara total penistaan agama, peraturan ini dapat digunakan untuk menghukum ataupun memperbolehkan yang merasa terhina untuk menghukum pelaku. Peraturan ini mungkin saja diretalasi dan diberlakukan untuk perbuatan ''[[blasphemous libel]]'',<ref>{{cite web | last = Kerr | first = ine | title = Libel and blasphemy bill passed by the Dail |work=The Irish Independent | date = 9 July 2009 | url = http://www.independent.ie/national-news/libel-and-blasphemy-bill-passed-by-the-dail-1813479.html | access-date = 17 November 2009}}</ref> perbuatan menentang norma, melarang seseorang untuk beribadah,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/aa1991204/s124a.html |title=Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 – Sect 124A: Vilification on grounds of race, religion, sexuality or gender identity unlawful |publisher=Austlii.edu.au |access-date=10 November 2011}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.police.vic.gov.au/content.asp?document_id=23370 |title=Victoria Police – Racial and religious vilification |publisher=Police.vic.gov.au |access-date=10 November 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927090124/http://www.police.vic.gov.au/content.asp?document_id=23370 |archive-date=27 September 2011}}</ref> perilaku merendahkan agama,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://merlin.obs.coe.int/redirect.php?id=11512 |title=European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), ''Report on the relationship between freedom of expression and freedom of religion: the issue of regulation and prosecution of blasphemy, religious insult and incitement to religious hatred'', 17–18 October 2008, Doc. No. CDL-AD(2008)026 |publisher=Merlin.obs.coe.int |access-date=10 November 2011 |archive-date=2 October 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111002221825/http://merlin.obs.coe.int/redirect.php?id=11512 |url-status=dead }}</ref> ataupun juga untuk [[ujaran kebencian]].

 

== Penistaan Agama di Indonesia ==