Wikipedia:Investigasi pengguna siluman/Farouq Abbas: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
GuerraSucia (bicara | kontrib) ←Membuat halaman berisi '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=yes <!--Jika Anda tidak ingin meminta pemeriksaan oleh pemeriksa (CheckUser), cukup ubah baris di atas komentar ini menjadi checkuser=no, ini hanya berlaku untuk kasus khusus, misalnya saat akun siluman jelas terlihat melalui bukti perilaku, lihat WP:DUCK dan harus segera diblokir karena suntingan yang tidak konstruktif. Untuk daftar akun siluman yang dicurigai, Anda dapat menggunakan hingga sock20 dan ip20. Jika ada lebih dari...' |
→29 April 2022: Balas |
||
Baris 15:
Farouq Abbas dan M Farouq Abbas memiliki nama yang hampir identik, sementara di antara ketiga akun ini, kesamaannya adalah memasukkan konten kontroversial berdasarkan penafsiran sendiri (menggunakan sumber primer alih-alih sekunder) di artikel [[peraturan perang Islam]]. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[Pengguna:GuerraSucia|<span style="color:# 660066">GuerraSucia</span>]]</span> 29 April 2022 09.52 (UTC)
:Halo, :)
:Baru tahu saya ada peraturan seperti ini, maaf atas keteledoran saya yang kurang teliti membaca semua peraturan. Pertama mesti saya luruskan kalau Farouq.Abbas tanpa M adalah saya sendiri, tapi saya lupa dengan password-nya. Sedangkan Imran Shiddiq adalah sahabat saya.
:Yang kedua mengenai sumber primer, dari yang saya baca di sini sepertinya tidak ada salahnya ya.
:https://en.wiki-indonesia.club/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_primary_sources
:{{cquote|"Secondary" is not, and should not be, a bit of jargon used by Wikipedians to mean "good" or "reliable" or "usable". Secondary '''does not''' mean that the source is [[WP:INDY|independent]], authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, expert-approved, subject to editorial control, or published by a reputable publisher. Secondary sources can be unreliable, biased, [[conflict of interest|self-serving]] and [[wikt:self-publishing|self-published]].
:According to our [[:Category:Wikipedia content guidelines|content guideline]] on [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources|identifying reliable sources]], reliable sources have most, if not all, of the following characteristics:
:* It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
:* It is [[Wikipedia:Published|published]] by a reputable publishing house, rather than by the author(s).
:* It is "appropriate for the material in question", i.e., the source is directly about the subject, rather than mentioning something unrelated in passing.
:* It is a third-party or independent source, with no significant financial or other [[conflict of interest]].
:* It has a professional structure in place for deciding whether to publish something, such as [[editor]]ial oversight or [[peer review]] processes.
:A primary source can have all of these qualities, and a secondary source may have none of them. Deciding whether primary, secondary or tertiary sources are appropriate on any given occasion is a matter of good editorial judgment and common sense, not merely mindless, knee-jerk reactions to classification of a source as "primary" or "secondary".
:'''"Primary" does not mean "bad"'''
:'''"Primary" is not, and should not be, a bit of jargon used by Wikipedians to mean "bad" or "unreliable" or "unusable". While some primary sources are not fully independent, they can be authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, expert-approved, subject to editorial control, and published by a reputable publisher. '''
:Primary sources {{em|can}} be [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable]], and they {{em|can}} be used. Sometimes, a primary source is even the best possible source, such as when you are supporting a direct [[WP:Manual of Style#Quotations|quotation]]. In such cases, the original document is the best source because the original document will be free of any errors or misquotations introduced by subsequent sources.}}<br/>
:Mengenai penafsiran sendiri, maaf, tapi menurut saya itu lebih layak ditujukan utk editan yang anda kembalikan. Karena pertama, banyak sitasi yang tidak sesuai; kedua, banyak sitasi tidak dapat dikonfirmasi karena tidak jelas pada halaman berapa, nomor berapa; Ketiga, bahkan beberapa point ataupun informasi tidak ada sitasi.<br/>
:Untuk selebihnya mungkin dapat dilanjurkan pada pembicaraan halaman yang bersangkutan.<br/>
:Terima Kasih -[[Pengguna:M Farouq Abbas|M Farouq Abbas]] ([[Pembicaraan Pengguna:M Farouq Abbas|bicara]]) 29 April 2022 12.16 (UTC)
======<span style="font-size:150%">Komentar pengguna lain</span>======
| |||