Sabelianisme: Perbedaan antara revisi

{{Utama|Tritunggal}}

Modalisme sudah lumrah dikait-kaitkan dengan [[Sabellius|Sabelius]], presbiter yang mengajarkan salah satu ragam dari bidat tersebut di Roma pada abad ke-3. Sabelius terjangkit bidat ini melalui ajaran-ajaran [[Noetus|Netus]] dan [[Prakseas]].<ref>''A History of Christianity: Jilid I: Beginnings to 1500'' oleh Kenneth S. Latourette, Edisi Revisi hlmn. 144-146, diterbitkan oleh HarperCollins, 1975: {{ISBN|0-06-064952-6}}, {{ISBN|978-0-06-064952-4}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=Q4pzuXCiDdYC&pg=PA144&lpg=PA144&dq=Sabellius+text&source=web&ots=iQo0P9RxOk&sig=-jYiQEtbssiYsNExqzB5R_vDA9Y&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPA144,M1]</ref> Netus diekskomunikasi dari Gereja sesudah diperiksa di hadapan sidang uskup,<ref name="Against the Heresy of Noetus">{{cite web|last1=Hippolytus|first1=of Rome|title=Against the Heresy of Noetus|url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.ii.iv.html?highlight=against,noetus#highlight|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref> sementara Prakseas dikabarkan menarik kembali pandangan-pandangan modalistisnya lewat pernyataan tertulis, dan kembali mengajarkan akidahnya yang lama.<ref name="Against Praxeas, Chapter 1">{{cite web|last1=Tertullian|first1=of Carthage|title=Against Praxeas, Bab 1|url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.v.ix.i.html|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref> Sabelius juga diekskomunikasi oleh sidang uskup di Aleksandria. Lantaran mengajukan banding ke Roma, sekali lagi digelar sidang uskup di Roma, yang pada akhirnya tidak saja membidatkan Sabelianisme, melainkan juga Arianisme dan Triteisme, serta mengukuhkan ''Tiga Serangkai Ilahi'' sebagai pemahaman yang katolik akan ''Monarki Ilahi''.<ref name="History of the Christian Church, Volume II">{{cite web|last1=Schaff|first1=Phillip|title=History of the Christian Church, Jilid II|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc2.v.xiv.xvi.html?|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref><ref name="Against Sabellians">{{cite web|last1=Dionysius|first1=bishop of Rome|title=Against Sabellians|url=http://www.earlychurchtexts.com/public/dionysius_of_rome_against_sabellians.htm|website=Early Christian Writings|access-date=28 Mei 2017}}</ref>

 

<blockquote>Some others are secretly introducing another doctrine, who have become disciples of one Noetus, who was a native of Smyrna, (and) lived not very long ago. This person was greatly puffed up and inflated with pride, being inspired by the conceit of a strange spirit.<ref name="Against the Heresy of Noetus"/> | There has appeared one, Noetus by name, and by birth a native of Smyrna. This person introduced a heresy from the tenets of Heraclitus. Now a certain man called Epigonus becomes his minister and pupil, and this person during his sojourn at Rome disseminated his godless opinion. But Cleomenes, who had become his disciple, an alien both in way of life and habits from the Church, was wont to corroborate the (Noetian) doctrine.<ref name="The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 9">{{cite web|last1=Hippolytus|first1=of Rome|title=The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 9|url=http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/hippolytus9.html|website=EarlyChristianWritings|access-date=29 May 2017}}</ref> | But in like manner, also, Noetus, being by birth a native of Smyrna, and a fellow addicted to reckless babbling, as well as crafty withal, introduced (among us) this heresy which originated from one Epigonus. It reached Rome, and was adopted by Cleomenes, and so has continued to this day among his successors.<ref name="The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 10">{{cite web|last1=Hippolytus|first1=of Rome|title=The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 10|url=http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/hippolytus10.html|website=EarlyChristianWritings|access-date=29 May 2017}}</ref> </blockquote>