Sabelianisme: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Baris 12:
{{Utama|Tritunggal}}
Modalisme sudah lumrah dikait-kaitkan dengan [[Sabellius|Sabelius]], presbiter yang mengajarkan salah satu ragam dari bidat tersebut di Roma pada abad ke-3. Sabelius terjangkit bidat ini melalui ajaran-ajaran [[Noetus|Netus]] dan [[Prakseas]].<ref>''A History of Christianity: Jilid I: Beginnings to 1500'' oleh Kenneth S. Latourette, Edisi Revisi hlmn. 144-146, diterbitkan oleh HarperCollins, 1975: {{ISBN|0-06-064952-6}}, {{ISBN|978-0-06-064952-4}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=Q4pzuXCiDdYC&pg=PA144&lpg=PA144&dq=Sabellius+text&source=web&ots=iQo0P9RxOk&sig=-jYiQEtbssiYsNExqzB5R_vDA9Y&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPA144,M1]</ref> Netus diekskomunikasi dari Gereja sesudah diperiksa di hadapan sidang uskup,<ref name="Against the Heresy of Noetus">{{cite web|last1=Hippolytus|first1=of Rome|title=Against the Heresy of Noetus|url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.ii.iv.html?highlight=against,noetus#highlight|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref> sementara Prakseas dikabarkan menarik kembali pandangan-pandangan modalistisnya lewat pernyataan tertulis, dan kembali mengajarkan akidahnya yang lama.<ref name="Against Praxeas, Chapter 1">{{cite web|last1=Tertullian|first1=of Carthage|title=Against Praxeas, Bab 1|url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.v.ix.i.html|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref> Sabelius juga diekskomunikasi oleh sidang uskup di Aleksandria. Lantaran mengajukan banding ke Roma, sekali lagi digelar sidang uskup di Roma, yang pada akhirnya tidak saja membidatkan Sabelianisme, melainkan juga Arianisme dan Triteisme, serta mengukuhkan ''Tiga Serangkai Ilahi'' sebagai pemahaman yang katolik akan ''Monarki Ilahi''.<ref name="History of the Christian Church, Volume II">{{cite web|last1=Schaff|first1=Phillip|title=History of the Christian Church, Jilid II|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc2.v.xiv.xvi.html?|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref><ref name="Against Sabellians">{{cite web|last1=Dionysius|first1=bishop of Rome|title=Against Sabellians|url=http://www.earlychurchtexts.com/public/dionysius_of_rome_against_sabellians.htm|website=Early Christian Writings|access-date=28 Mei 2017}}</ref>
[[Hipolitus dari Roma]], yangmengenal Sabelius secara pribadi, mengemukakan di dalam karya tulisnya, ''[[Membantah Segala Bidat]]'', mengemukakan bahwa ia dan orang-orang lain sudah berusaha menasihati Sabelius. Ia tahu Sabelius menentang teologi [[Tritunggal]], tetapi ia menyebut Monarkianisme Modalistis sebagai bidat Netus, bukan bidat Sabelius.<!-- SabellianismSabelianisme wasmenjangkiti embracedumat byKristen Christiansdi indaerah [[CyrenaicaKirenaika|Kirenaike]], to whomsampai-sampai [[DionysiusPaus Dionisius ofdari AlexandriaAleksandria|DionysiusDionisius]], [[PatriarchPatriark ofAleksandria|Batrik AlexandriaAleksandria]] (whoyang wasbesar instrumentalandilnya indalam thepengekskomunikasian excommunicationSabelius ofdi SabelliusAleksandria, inmerasa Alexandria),perlu wrotemenginsafkan lettersmereka arguingdari againstkesesatan thislewat beliefsurat. HippolytusHipolitus himselfsendiri perceivedmemandang modalismModalisme assebagai asuatu newgagasan andbaru peculiardan ideatidak whichbiasa wasyang covertly gainingdiam-diam amenarik followingpengikut:
 
<{{blockquote>Some|Beberapa othersorang arelain secretlydiam-diam introducingmendakwahkan anotherajaran doctrinebaru, whoyakni haveorang-orang becomeyang disciplessudah ofberguru onekepada Noetussi Netus, whopribumi wasSmirna ayang nativebelum ofbegitu Smyrna,lama (and)berpulang. lived not very long ago.Orang Thisini person wassangat greatlybesar puffedkepala updan andpenuh inflateddengan with pridekesombongan, beinglantaran inspireddiperdaya bywangsit the conceit ofdari aroh strangeyang spiritaneh.<ref name="Against the Heresy of Noetus"/> | ThereTelah hasmuncul appeared oneseseorang, NoetusNetus by namenamanya, andasli bykelahiran birthSmirna. aOrang nativeini ofmendakwahkan Smyrna.suatu Thisbidat personyang introducedbersumber adari heresypokok-pokok frompikiran the tenets of HeraclitusHeraklitus. Now aLalu certainada manseseorang calledbernama Epigonus becomesmenjadi hisrohaniwan ministersekaligus andmuridnya. pupil,Sewaktu andsinggah thisdi personRoma, duringorang hisini sojournmemperkenalkan atgagasannya Rome disseminated hisyang godlessmenghujat opinionAllah. ButNamun CleomenesKleomenes, whoyang hadsudah becomemenjadi his disciplemuridnya, anseorang alienyang bothtidak intahu wayapa-apa ofmengenai lifecara andhidup habitsdan fromadat-istiadat the ChurchGereja, wasyang wontbiasa tomenyiarkan corroborate theajaran (NoetianNetus) doctrineitu.<ref name="The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 9">{{cite web|last1=Hippolytus|first1=of Rome|title=The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 9|url=http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/hippolytus9.html|website=EarlyChristianWritings|access-date=29 MayMei 2017}}</ref> | ButTetapi indengan likecara manner,yang demikian alsopula, NoetusNetus, beingorang bykelahiran birthSmirna, apecandu nativeceracau oftidak Smyrnakeruan, andyang ajuga fellowpandai addictedmelakukannya, tomendakwahkan reckless(di babbling,tengah-tengah askami) wellbidat as crafty withalini, introducedyakni (amongbidat us)yang thisbersumber heresydari which originated from onesi Epigonus. ItBidat reachedini Rome,menjalar andsampai waske adoptedRoma bylalu Cleomenes,dianut andKleomenes sosehingga hasbertahan continuedsampai tosekarang, thisdiusung daypara among his successorspenerusnya.<ref name="The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 10">{{cite web|last1=Hippolytus|first1=of Rome|title=The Refutation of All Heresies, Book 10|url=http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/hippolytus10.html|website=EarlyChristianWritings|access-date=29 MayMei 2017}}</ref> }}</blockquote>!--
 
Tertullian also perceived modalism as entering into the Church from without as a new idea, and opposing the doctrine which had been received through succession. After setting forth his understanding of the manner of faith which had been received by the Church, he then describes how the "simple" who always constitute the majority of believers are often startled at the idea that the One God exists in three and were opposed to his understanding of "the rule of faith." Proponents of Tertullian argue that he described the "simple" as the majority, rather than those who opposed him as the majority. This is contended from Tertullian's argument that they were putting forth ideas of their own which had not been taught to them by their elders: