Rings (film 2017): Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.8.6 |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.2 |
||
Baris 42:
Di [[Amerika Utara]], film ini dirilis bersama ''[[The Space Between Us (film)|The Space Between Us]]'' dan ''[[The Comedian (2016 film)|The Comedian]]'', dan diproyeksikan meraih penghasilan sebesar $12–14 juga dari 3,000 gedung bioskop yang memutar, pada pemutaran akhir pekan.<ref name="preview">{{cite web|url=http://deadline.com/2017/02/rings-split-space-between-us-super-bowl-weekend-box-office-1201899639/|title=‘Rings’ Hopes To Choke ‘Split’ In Genre Scrimmage Over Super Bowl Weekend – Box Office|work=[[Deadline.com]]}}</ref> Namun hasil riil yang didapat sebesar $800,000 sejak pemutaran hari Kamis malam.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=4264&p=.htm|title='Split' Looks to Fend Off 'Rings' and 'Space Between Us' Over Super Bowl Weekend|work=[[Box Office Mojo]]}}</ref> Setelah itu, penghasilan meningkat menjadi $13 million, berakhir dengan peringkat ke-dua box office setelah sesama film horor ''[[Split (2016 American film)|Split]]''.<ref name="weekend">{{cite web|url=http://deadline.com/2017/02/rings-the-space-between-weekend-box-office-1201901560/|title=‘Split’ Dings ‘Rings’; Auds Keep Distance From ‘Space’; ‘Comedian’ Bombs: Sunday Update|work=[[Deadline.com]]}}</ref>
[[Rotten Tomatoes]], melaporkan bahwa film ini memiliki rating sebesar 5% berdasarkan ulasan 75 orang kritikus, dengan rata-rata rating sebesar 3.1/10, menjadi rating terburuk di antara trilogi lainnya.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rings_2017|title=Rings (2017)|website=Rotten Tomatoes|publisher=Fandango|accessdate=February 10, 2017}}</ref> Sedangkan [[Metacritic]], mencantumkan bahwa film ini memiliki skor 25 dari 100, berdasarkan ulasan 23 kritikus, yang mengindikasikan bahwa film ini, secara umum, cukup digemari.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.metacritic.com/movie/rings|title=Rings reviews|website=Metacritic|accessdate=February 10, 2017}}</ref> Jajak pendapat penonton yang dilakukan [[CinemaScore]] mengindikasikan peringkat "C–" dari A+ sampai F.<ref name="CinemaScore">{{cite web|url=https://m.cinemascore.com|title=CinemaScore|work=cinemascore.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.ign.com/articles/2017/02/04/rings-review|title=''Rings'' Review|date=3 February 2017|publisher=[[IGN]]|last1=Gilyadov|first1=Alex|accessdate=8 February 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/peter-travers-rings-movie-review-w464098|title='Rings' Review: Latest Entry in Haunted-Video Franchise May Kill You With Boredom|date=3 February 2017|work=[[Rolling Stone]]|last1=Travers|first1=Peter|accessdate=8 February 2017|archive-date=2017-02-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170211155119/http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/peter-travers-rings-movie-review-w464098|dead-url=yes}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/rings-2017|title=Rings Movie Review & Film Summary (2017)|date=3 February 2017|publisher=RogerEbert.com|last1=Sobczynski|first1=Peter|accessdate=8 February 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.avclub.com/review/samara-goes-digital-rings-still-just-faded-copy-de-249684|title=Samara goes digital in Rings, but this is still just a faded copy of last decade’s scares|date=3 February 2017|work=[[The A.V. Club]]|last1=Dowd|first1=A.A.|accessdate=8 February 2017}}</ref>
== Pranala luar ==
| |||