Politisasi sains: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.2 |
k pembersihan kosmetika dasar, added orphan tag |
||
Baris 1:
{{Orphan|date=Februari 2023}}
'''Politisasi ilmu pengetahuan''' untuk keuntungan [[politik]] terjadi ketika pemerintah, bisnis, atau kelompok advokasi menggunakan tekanan [[hukum]] atau [[ekonomi]] untuk mempengaruhi temuan, penyebarluasan, pelaporan atau penafsiran suatu penelitian ilmiah. Politisasi sains juga dapat berdampak negatif terhadap kebebasan akademik dan ilmiah, dan akibatnya dianggap tabu untuk mencampurkan politik dengan sains. Berbagai kelompok telah melakukan berbagai kampanye untuk mempromosikan kepentingan mereka yang bertentangan dengan konsensus ilmiah, dalam upaya untuk memanipulasi kebijakan publik.<ref name=discovery>{{Cite web |url=http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&program=CSC-News&id=2445 |title=Evolution or design debate heats up. |access-date=2021-10-14 |archive-date=2011-03-11 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110311170638/http://www.antievolution.org/features/wedge.pdf |dead-url=yes }}</ref><ref name=AAAS>"Some bills seek to discredit evolution by emphasizing so-called "flaws" in the theory of evolution or "disagreements" within the scientific community. Others insist that teachers have absolute freedom within their classrooms and cannot be disciplined for teaching non-scientific "alternatives" to evolution. A number of bills require that students be taught to "critically analyze" evolution or to understand "the controversy." But there is no significant controversy within the scientific community about the validity of the theory of evolution. The current controversy surrounding the teaching of evolution is not a scientific one."
{{cite web|url=http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2006/pdf/0219boardstatement.pdf|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204044657/https://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2006/pdf/0219boardstatement.pdf|archive-date=4 February 2012|title=AAAS Statement on the Teaching of Evolution|publisher=[[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]|date=16 February 2006}}</ref><ref name=nejm>[http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/21/2277 Intelligent Judging – Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom] George J. Annas, [[New England Journal of Medicine]], Volume 354:2277–81 May 25, 2006</ref>
Baris 11 ⟶ 13:
==Bacaan lebih lanjut==
* [[Shawn Lawrence Otto]], ''Fool Me Twice: Fighting The Assault On Science In America'', Rodale Books, 2011, {{ISBN|978-1-60529-217-5}}
* [[Steven Rose]], "Pissing in the Snow" (review of Audra J. Wolfe, ''Freedom's Laboratory: The Cold War Struggle for the Soul of Science'', Johns Hopkins, January 2019, {{ISBN|978-1-4214-2673-0}}, 302 pp.), ''[[London Review of Books]]'', vol. 41, no. 14 (18 July 2019), pp.
==Pranala luar==
Baris 20 ⟶ 22:
* {{cite book |title=Censoring Science: Inside the Political Attack on Dr. James Hansen and the Truth of Global Warming|last=Bowen |first=Mark |author-link=Mark Bowen (writer)|year=2008 |publisher=Dutton |location=New York |isbn=978-0-525-95014-1|title-link=James Hansen }}
{{refend}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Politicization Of Science}}
Baris 28 ⟶ 29:
[[Kategori:Kontroversi ilmiah]]
[[Kategori:Agama dan sains]]
{{politik-stub}}
{{ilmu-stub}}
| |||