Atsariyah: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
RaFaDa20631 (bicara | kontrib) |
RaFaDa20631 (bicara | kontrib) kTidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
||
Baris 4:
* {{harvtxt|Abrahamov|2016|pp=263–279}}}} Mazhab akidah ini muncul pada akhir abad ke-8 M dari para ulama ''[[Ahli Hadis]]'', sebuah gerakan keagamaan [[Islam]] yang menolak doktrin teologis Islam rasionalistik (''[[Ilmu kalam|kalām]]'') serta mendukung pemaknaan tekstual yang ketat dalam hal menafsirkan [[Al-Qur'an]] dan [[hadis]].<ref name="Abrahamov 2016">{{Cite book|last=Abrahamov|first=Binyamin|year=2016|title=The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology|location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]]|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=9780199696703|editor-last=Schmidtke|editor-first=Sabine|editor-link=Sabine Schmidtke|pages=263–279|chapter=Part I: Islamic Theologies during the Formative and the Early Middle period – Scripturalist and Traditionalist Theology|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696703.013.025|lccn=2016935488|orig-year=2014|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=70wnDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA263}}</ref><ref name="Halverson-36q">{{Harvard citation text|Halverson|2010}}. "The Atharis can thus be described as a school or movement led by a contingent of scholars (''[[ulama]]''), typically [[Mazhab Hambali|Hanbalite]] or even [[Mazhab Syafi'i|Shafi'ite]], which retained influence, or at the very least a shared sentiment and conception of piety, well beyond the limited range of Hanbalite communities. This body of scholars continued to reject theology in favor of strict textualism well after Ash'arism had infiltrated the Sunni schools of law. It is for these reasons that we must delineate the existence of a distinct traditionalist, anti-theological movement, which defies strict identification with any particular ''madhhab'', and therefore cannot be described as Hanbalite."</ref> Namanya berasal dari kata ''[[Hadis|aṡar]]'' yang berarti "tradisional".<ref name="Abrahamov 2016" /> Penganutnya dikenal sebagai "''Ahli Atsar''", "''[[Ahli Hadis]]''", dll.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Azoulay|first=Rivka|year=2020|title=Kuwait and Al-Sabah: Tribal Politics and Power in an Oil State|location=50 Bedford Square, London, UK|publisher=I.B. Tauris|isbn=978-1-8386-0505-6|page=224}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Vlad Ghiță|first=Adrian|year=2019|title=Revivalismul islamic. Tendinţe înnoitoare|trans-title=Islamic Revivalism: Renewing trends|url=https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=880377|journal=Theology and Life|volume=40|issue=9–12|pages=143|archive-url=|archive-date=|access-date=|url-status=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|last=Bishara|first=Azmi|year=2022|title=On Salafism: Concepts and Contexts|location=Stanford, California, USA|publisher=Stanford University Press|isbn=9781503631786|page=2|chapter=1: What is Salafism?|lccn=2021061200}}</ref>
Penganut Atsariyah berkeyakinan bahwa pemaknaan literal dari Al-Qur'an dan hadis merupakan satu-satunya otoritas yang sah dalam memakanai [[Akidah Islam|akidah]] dan [[fikih]];<ref name="Abrahamov 2016">{{Cite book|last=Abrahamov|first=Binyamin|year=2016|title=The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology|location=[[Oxford]] and [[New York City|New York]]|publisher=[[Oxford University Press]]|isbn=9780199696703|editor-last=Schmidtke|editor-first=Sabine|editor-link=Sabine Schmidtke|pages=263–279|chapter=Part I: Islamic Theologies during the Formative and the Early Middle period – Scripturalist and Traditionalist Theology|doi=10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199696703.013.025|lccn=2016935488|orig-year=2014|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=70wnDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA263}}</ref> serta tidak boleh menggunakan perdebatan rasional, bahkan jika untuk memverifikasi kebenaran.<ref name="Halverson-36">{{Harvard citation text|Halverson|2010}}.</ref> Atsariyah tidak setuju dengan penafsiran majazi (metafor) mengenai [[Antropomorfisme|deskripsi antropomorfis]] dan [[Allah (Islam)|sifat-sifat Allah]] (maksudnya: mentakwil) serta tidak mengkonseptualisasikan makna Al-Qur'an secara rasional<ref name="Hoover 2020">{{Cite book|last=Hoover|first=John|year=2020|title=Philosophical Theology in Islam: Later Ashʿarism East and West|location=[[Leiden]] and [[Boston]]|publisher=[[Brill Publishers]]|isbn=978-90-04-42661-0|editor-last=Shihadeh|editor-first=Ayman|series=Islamicate Intellectual History|volume=5|pages=195–230|chapter=Early Mamlūk Ashʿarism against Ibn Taymiyya on the Nonliteral Reinterpretation (''taʾwīl'') of God’s Attributes|doi=10.1163/9789004426610_009|issn=2212-8662|lccn=2020008682|editor-last2=Thiele|editor-first2=Jan|chapter-url=https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/3741348}}</ref> karena mereka meyakini bahwa realitas mereka harus diserahkan kepada Allah saja (''[[tafwidh]]'').<ref name="Halverson-3637">{{Harvard citation text|Halverson|2010}}.</ref> Intinya, mereka menegaskan bahwa pemaknaan literal Al-Qur'an dan hadis harus diterima tanpa "bagaimana caranya memaknainya" (yaitu
Mazhab akidah muncul di kalangan ulama hadits yang akhirnya bergabung menjadi gerakan yang disebut ''[[Ahli Hadis]]'' di bawah kepemimpinan [[Ahmad bin Hanbal]] (780–855).<ref name="Lapidus130">{{Harvard citation text|Lapidus|2014|page=130}}</ref>{{Efn|Meskipun Hanbali adalah pendukung kuat dari keyakinan Atsariyah, mazhab ini menjadi pemain penting Dunia Sunni sepanjang sejarah:
|