Sabelianisme: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tag: halaman dengan galat kutipan
Tag: halaman dengan galat kutipan
Baris 18:
"Sabelianisme" terambil dari nama [[Sabellius|Sabelius]] (berkiprah sekitar tahun 215), orang yang mengajarkan salah satu ragam Monarkianisme di Roma pada abad ke-3. Tidak satu pun karya tulisnya yang sintas, dan semua keterangan mengenai dirinya berasal dari berbagai karya tulis lawan-lawannya, yang bukanlah sumber terandal.
 
Monarkianisme didapatkan Sabelius dari ajaran-ajaran [[Noetus]] dan [[Prakseas]].<ref>''A History of Christianity: Jilid I: Beginnings to 1500'' oleh Kenneth S. Latourette, Edisi Terevisi hlmn.144-146, diterbitkan oleh HarperCollins, 1975: {{ISBN|0-06-064952-6}}, {{ISBN|978-0-06-064952-4}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=Q4pzuXCiDdYC&dq=Sabellius+text&pg=PA144]</ref> Noetus dikucilkan dari Gereja sesudah diuji di hadapan sidang rohaniwan,<ref name="Against the Heresy of Noetus">{{cite web |last1=Hippolytus |first1=of Rome |title=Against the Heresy of Noetus |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf05.iii.iv.ii.iv.html?highlight=against,noetus#highlight |access-date=29 May 2017 |website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library}}</ref> dan Prakseas kabarnya sudah mengakui kekeliruan pandangan-pandangan modalistisnya secara tertulitertulis, dan kembali mengajarkan imannyaakidah yang semula dianutnya.<ref name="Against Praxeas, Chapter 1">{{cite web |last1=Tertullian |first1=of Carthage |title=Against Praxeas, Bab 1 |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf03.v.ix.i.html |access-date=29 Mei 2017 |website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library}}</ref> Nasib yang sama menimpa Sabelius. Ia dijatuhi hukuman pengucilan oleh sidang rohaniwan di Aleksandria, dan lantaran naik banding ke Roma, diselenggarakannya sidang kedua di Roma yang juga membidatkan ajaran Sabelius.<ref name="History of the Christian Church, Volume II">{{cite web |last1=Schaff |first1=Phillip |title=History of the Christian Church, Jilid II |url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/hcc2.v.xiv.xvi.html? |access-date=29 Mei 2017 |website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library}}</ref><ref name="Against Sabellians">{{cite web |last1=Dionisius|first1=Uskup Roma|title=Melawan Kaum Sabelian |url=http://www.earlychurchtexts.com/public/dionysius_of_rome_against_sabellians.htm |access-date=28 Mei 2017 |website=Early Christian Writings}}</ref><!--
 
"Sabellius held to the simple unity of the person and nature of God."<ref>{{Cite book |last=VON MOSHEIM |first=JOHN LAURENCE |url=https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=0l9M6PLRNcQC&pg=GBS.PA220&hl=en |title=HISTORICAL COMMENTARIES ON THE STATE OF CHRISTIANITY |date=1854 |publisher=S. Converse |language=en}}</ref> However, the form of Sabellianism taught by Sabellius is not the same as Monarchianism. He did not believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are simply three names for the same Reality. [https://books.google.com/books?id=0l9M6PLRNcQC&pg=PA216&lpg=PA216&dq=sabellius&source=web&ots=tdh6SBBohv&sig=An9W_gIKSxHAMTh2VCFGtF4T1m8#PPA218,M1 Von Mosheim], German Lutheran theologian who founded the pragmatic school of church historians,<ref>{{Cite web |title=Johann Lorenz von Mosheim {{!}} German theologian {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/Johann-Lorenz-von-Mosheim |access-date=2021-12-08 |website=www.britannica.com |language=en}}</ref> argues that Sabellius did describe God as three in one sense but one in another. He "believed the distinction of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, described in the Scriptures, to be a real distinction, and not a mere appellative or nominal one."<ref>{{Cite book |last=VON MOSHEIM |first=JOHN LAURENCE |url=https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=0l9M6PLRNcQC&pg=GBS.PA221&hl=en |title=HISTORICAL COMMENTARIES ON THE STATE OF CHRISTIANITY |date=1854 |publisher=S. Converse |language=en}}</ref> He maintained that, just like a man is one person, but has a body, a soul, and a spirit, so God is one Person, yet in that Person, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit can be discriminated.