Sabelianisme: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
|||
Baris 80:
Perbandingan pernyataan Tertulianus di atas dengan contoh pernyataan golongan Pentakosta Keesaan berikut ini cukup menarik: "Yesus adalah Anak Allah menurut daging... dan Ia sendiri adalah Allah yang sejati menurut Roh...."<ref name="The God Head">{{cite web|title=The God Head|url=http://www.theapostolicwayupcff.com/page/the_god_head|website=theapostolicwayupcff.com|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Skynner |first1=Robert |title=Answering Oneness Pentecostals: Colossians 2:9|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl2OqOsYLUc| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200524034505/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zl2OqOsYLUc&gl=US&hl=en |archive-date= 24 Mei 2020 | url-status=dead|website=YouTube|access-date=29 Mei 2017}}</ref><!--
Bentuk Nama Tuhan yang muncul di dalam ayat ke-19 [[Amanat Agung]] ({{Alkitab|Matius 28:16-20}}) juga secara historis dilisankan dalam upacara pembaptisan Kristen, umat Kristen Tritunggalis mengimani kewujudan tiga Oknum Tritunggal Mahakudus yang berlainan, sekalipun saling mendiami satu di dalam yang lain satmendiami , albeit co-inherent, persons of the Holy Trinity received witness by Jesus' baptism. Many modalists do not use this form as the Lord's Name. It is also suggested by some modern Oneness Pentecostal critics, that nas {{Alkitab|Matius 28:19}} bukanlah bagian dari karya tulis aslinya, karena [[Eusebius dari Kaisarea]] mengutip nas tersebut dengan frasa "di dalam nama-Ku", and in that source there was no mention of baptism in the verse.
In passages of scripture such as Matthew 3:16-17 where the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are separated in the text and witness, modalists view this phenomenon as confirming God's [[omnipresence]], and His ability to [[omnipotence|manifest himself as he pleases]]. Oneness Pentecostals and Modalists attempt to dispute the traditional doctrine of eternal co-existent union, while affirming the Christian doctrine of God taking on flesh as Jesus Christ. Like Trinitarians, Oneness adherents attest that Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man. However, Trinitarians believe that the "Word of God," the eternal second Person of the Trinity,<ref name="Contra Gentes Part III">{{cite web|last1=St. Athanasius|first1=of Alexandria|title=Contra Gentes Part III|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.vi.ii.iii.xii.html|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=28 May 2017}}</ref> was manifest as the Son of God by taking humanity to Himself and by glorifying that Humanity to equality with God through His resurrection, in eternal union with His own Divinity.<ref name="The Incarnation of the Word">{{cite web|last1=St. Athanasius|first1=of Alexandria|title=The Incarnation of the Word|url=https://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf204.vii.ii.viii.html|website=Christian Classics Ethereal Library|access-date=28 May 2017}}</ref> In contrast, Oneness adherents hold that the One and Only true God—Who manifests Himself in any way He chooses, including as Father, Son and Holy Spirit (though not choosing to do so in an eternally simultaneous manner)—became man in the temporary role of Son.<ref>{{cite web|title=The End of the "Son"|url=http://www.christiandefense.com/one_introduction.htm#theend|website=ChristianDefense.com|access-date=28 May 2017}}</ref> Many Oneness Pentecostals have also placed a strongly [[Nestorianism|Nestorian]] distinction between Jesus' humanity and Divinity<ref>{{cite web|last1=Dulle|first1=Jason|title=Avoiding the Achilles Heels...|url=http://www.onenesspentecostal.com/ugstsymposium.htm|website=OnenessPentecostal.com|access-date=28 May 2017}}</ref> as in the example compared with Tertullian's statement above.
| |||