Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Humboldt (bicara | kontrib)
Humboldt (bicara | kontrib)
 
Baris 45:
Buona sera Maulucioni, anche io non parlo l'italiano. What I mean is that "Philippine", here, should not be understood in the political sense of the word but as a [[:en:linguistics|linguistic]] designation because most of this group's languages are spoken in the Philippines. However, some languages of this group are spoken in Indonesia. Besides, since some [[:en:linguist|linguists]] consider that [[:en:Philippine languages|Philippine languages]] and [[:en:North Bornean languages|North Bornean languages]] are part of the same group, it can be useful to have a map showing both groups, [[Pengguna:Humboldt|Humboldt]] ([[Pembicaraan Pengguna:Humboldt|bicara]]) 19:28, 1 Mei 2011 (UTC)
:Halo. I understand your point. But I don't advise to use Berkas:Borneo-Philippines.svg map in Rumpun bahasa Filipina article, maybe this file goes better in Bahasa Kalimantan-Filipina article. The case is if you read by the way en:Borneo-Philippine languages article, you'll see that these languages are a paraphyletic group of the Austronesian languages. Sources of Auckland University clearly indicate that philliphine and bornean languages do not form a clade. Anyway I recommend Berkas:Austronesian languages.PNG file, which may appear in some articles. Regards: --Maulucioni (bicara) 05:01, 6 Mei 2011 (UTC)
Hello too, I agree with your remarks. However, the problem with your proposed map is that it shows a subgrouping of [[:en:Malayo-Polynesian languages]] that not all linguists agree to... [[Pengguna:Humboldt|Humboldt]] ([[Pembicaraan Pengguna:Humboldt|bicara]]) 19:31, 9 Mei 2011 (UTC)