Injil: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Baris 60:
== Injil Apokrif ==
<!--In addition to the four canonical gospels there have been other gospels that were not accepted into the canon. Generally these were not accepted due to doubt over the authorship, the time frame between the original writing and the events described, or content that was at odds with the prevailing orthodoxy. If a gospel claimed to be written by for example, James, but was clearly authored beyond 120AD, then there was little chance of the authorship being authentic. This differs from the four canonical gospels which the majority of historians agree were authored before 100AD. For this reason, most of these non-canonical texts were only ever accepted by small portions of the early Christian community. Some of the content of these non-canonical gospels (as much as it deviates from accepted theological norms) is considered [[heresy|heretical]] by the leadership of mainstream churches, including the [[Roman Catholic Church|Vatican]]. This can be seen in the case of the [[Gospel of Peter]], which was written in the correct time, 70-120 AD, but was considered dangerous for elements which could be used to support [[docetism]].
Two non-canonical gospels that are considered to be among the earliest in composition are the sayings ''[[Gospel of Thomas]]'' and the narrative ''[[Gospel of Peter]]''. The dating of the Gospel of Thomas is particularly controversial, as there is some suspicion in critical schools of scholarship that it predates the canonical Gospels, which would, if conclusively proven, have a profound impact on the understanding of their origin. Like the canonical gospels, scholars have to rely on higher criticism, not extant manuscripts, in order to roughly date Thomas.
A genre of "[[Infancy gospel]]s" (Greek: ''protoevangelion'') arose in the 2nd century, such as the ''[[Gospel of James]]'', which introduces the concept of the [[Perpetual Virginity]] of Mary, and the ''[[Infancy Gospel of Thomas]]'' (not to be confused with the absolutely different sayings ''Gospel of Thomas''), both of which related many miraculous incidents from the life of Mary and the childhood of Jesus that are not included in the canonical gospels, but which have passed into Christian lore.
Another genre that has been suppressed is that of gospel harmonies, in which the apparent discrepancies in the canonical four gospels were selectively recast to present a harmoniously consistent narrative text. Very few fragments of harmonies survived. The ''[[Diatessaron]]'' was such a harmonization, compiled by [[Tatian]] around AD 175. It was popular for at least two centuries in [[Syria]], but eventually it fell into disuse, and no copies of it have survived, except indirectly in some medieval Gospel harmonies that can be considered its descendants.
[[Marcion of Sinope]], c. AD 150, had a version of the ''Gospel of Luke'' which differed substantially from that which has now become the standard text. Marcion's version was far less ''Jewish'' than the now canonical text, and his critics alleged that he had edited out the portions he didn't like from the canonical version, though Marcion argued that his text was the more genuinely original one. Marcion also rejected all the other gospels, including Matthew, Mark, and especially John, which he alleged had been forged by Irenaeus.
The existence of private knowledge, briefly referred to in the canon, and particularly in the canonical Gospel of Mark, is part of the controversy surrounding the unexpectedly discovered '' [[Secret Gospel of Mark]]''.-->
Beberapa injil yang tidak dikanonkan mempunyai keserupaan dalam hal isi dan gaya bahasa, dibandingkan dengan injil-injil kanonik. Kebanyakan (yang lainnya) adalah [[gnostik]] dalam hal isi dan gaya bahasa, mempresentasikan / mengemukakan ajaran-ajaran dari sudut pandang yang sangat berbeda.
| |||