Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Tidak ada ringkasan suntingan |
|||
Baris 21:
While Cavalli-Sforza is best known for his work in genetics, he also, in collaboration with [[Marcus Feldman]] and others, initiated the sub-discipline of [[cultural anthropology]] known alternatively as [[coevolution]], [[gene-culture coevolution]], [[cultural transmission theory]] or [[dual inheritance theory]]. The publication ''[[Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach]]'' (1981) made use of models from population genetics to investigate the transmission of [[culturally transmitted units]]. This line of inquiry initiated research into the correlation of patterns of genetic and cultural dispersion.
==Mengenai paham "[[ras manusia]]"==
Pandangan Cavalli-Sforza telah berubah sejalan dengan waktu :
His proposed ambitious [[Human Genome Diversity Project]] to gather further genetic data from populations around the world was accused of "cultural insensitivity, [[neocolonialism]], and [[biopiracy]]."<ref>[http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/1999/mayjun/articles/cavalli_sforza.html Mitchell Leslie, "The History of Everyone and Everything", ''Stanford Magazine'']</ref>▼
{{Cquote|(1977)
Linguist [[William Poser]] in [[Language Log]] has criticized some of Cavalli-Sforza's comments about linguistics,<ref>[http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000209.html "Irresponsible Punditry", ''Language Log,'' Pennsylvania U. (December 10, 2003)]</ref> in particular the suggestion, echoing controversial linguists [[Merritt Ruhlen]] and [[Joseph Greenberg]], that some mainstream linguists are unnecessarily conservative about hypothesized long-range relationships between language families, and an overstatement that Greenberg's critics "have ruled out the possibility of hierarchical classification", which Cavalli-Sforza did not defend when challenged by Poser, but deferred to Ruhlen. Cavalli-Sforza's interest in hypothesized large-scale language families is as a basis for comparison with similarly large-scale postulated genetic classifications of human populations.▼
{{Cquote|(1994)
==Kritik==
▲{{Cquote|(1977) The differences that exist between the major racial groups are such that races could be called subspecies if we adopted for man a criterion suggested by Mayr (1963) for systematic [[zoology]].<ref>Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and W.F. Bodmer. (1977). The Genetics of Human Populations, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co</ref>}}
▲His proposed ambitious [[Human Genome Diversity Project]] to gather further genetic data from populations around the world was accused of "cultural insensitivity, [[neocolonialism]], and [[biopiracy]]."<ref>[http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/1999/mayjun/articles/cavalli_sforza.html Mitchell Leslie, "The History of Everyone and Everything", ''Stanford Magazine'']</ref>
▲Linguist [[William Poser]] in [[Language Log]] has criticized some of Cavalli-Sforza's comments about linguistics,<ref>[http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/000209.html "Irresponsible Punditry", ''Language Log,'' Pennsylvania U. (December 10, 2003)]</ref> in particular the suggestion, echoing controversial linguists [[Merritt Ruhlen]] and [[Joseph Greenberg]], that some mainstream linguists are unnecessarily conservative about hypothesized long-range relationships between language families, and an overstatement that Greenberg's critics "have ruled out the possibility of hierarchical classification", which Cavalli-Sforza did not defend when challenged by Poser, but deferred to Ruhlen. Cavalli-Sforza's interest in hypothesized large-scale language families is as a basis for comparison with similarly large-scale postulated genetic classifications of human populations.
▲{{Cquote|(1994) The classification into races has proved to be a futile exercise for reasons that were already clear to [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]].<ref>Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi, & Piazza, 1994, p. 19</ref>}}
==Notes==
| |||