Daftar film terlaris: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
k membetulkan ejaan Tag: halaman dengan galat kutipan |
|||
| (26 revisi perantara oleh 11 pengguna tidak ditampilkan) | |||
Baris 1:
{{pindah ke|Daftar film dengan penghasilan tertinggi}}
{{short description|Artikel daftar Wikimedia}}
[[
[[Film]] meraup penghasilan dari berbagai media, antara lain [[bioskop]], [[video rumahan]] (kaset), hak [[penyiaran]] [[televisi]], dan [[pernak-pernik]]. Namun, penghasilan [[box office]] bioskop merupakan acuan utama industri dalam menilai kesuksesan sebuah film. Alasannya, data bioskop lebih mudah diakses daripada data penjualan kaset dan hak siar. Selain itu, industri perfilman sudah biasa memakai data bioskop. Artikel ini berisi daftar film peraih box office tertinggi (berdasarkan [[nilai riil versus nominal (ekonomi)|nilai riil versus nominal]] penghasilannya), daftar film berpenghasilan tertinggi berdasarkan tahun kalender, urutan peralihan rekor film berpenghasilan tertinggi, dan daftar seri film berpenghasilan tertinggi. Semua daftar diurutkan berdasarkan penghasilan box office bioskop internasional (apabila ada datanya) tanpa menghitung hasil penjualan kaset, hak siar, dan pernak-pernik.
Baris 10 ⟶ 12:
{{TOC limit|2}}
== Film berpenghasilan tertinggi Indonesia ==
<!-- Note that films have a "close date" at Box Office Mojo. -->
<!-- When updating grosses, please update the access date in the reference! -->
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REPLACE IMAGE WITH A GALLERY WITHOUT OBTAINING A CONSENSUS FIRST AT Talk:List_of_highest-grossing_films#Image_in_highest-grossing_films_section ON TALK PAGE. -->[[
Dengan penghasilan box office global lebih dari $2,790 miliar, ''Avengers: Endgame'' menjadi film "berpenghasilan tertinggi", tetapi klaim ini biasanya hanya mengacu kepada penghasilan dari [[bioskop]] tanpa menghitung hasil penjualan [[video rumahan|kaset]] dan [[televisi|hak siar televisi]] (porsinya cukup besar dalam total penghasilan film). Apabila hasil penjualan kaset juga dihitung, film mana yang paling sukses tidak bisa langsung ditentukan. ''[[Titanic (film 1997)|Titanic]]'' meraup $1,2 miliar dari penjualan dan penyewaan [[video]] dan [[DVD]],<ref name="titanic-sales">{{cite journal |first=Zachary |last=Pincus-Roth |title=Movies aren’t the only B.O. monsters|journal=[[Variety (
Apabila sebuah film sangat mudah dieksploitasi sebagai barang komersial, penghasilan tambahannya bisa mengalahkan hasil penjualan langsung.<ref>{{cite news |last=Clark |first=Emma |title=How films make money |date=November 12, 2001 |work=[[BBC News]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/1646640.stm |accessdate=April 12, 2012}}</ref> ''The Lion King'' menghasilkan lebih dari $2 miliar lewat pemutaran bioskop dan penjualan kaset,<ref name="Pincus-Roth (2006)">{{cite news |first=Zachary |last=Pincus-Roth |title=Movies aren't the only B.O. monsters |date=January 8, 2006 |work=[[Variety (
Di daftar ini, film diurutkan berdasarkan penghasilan dari pemutaran bioskop dalam nilai nominal dan peringkat tertinggi yang dicapai. Secara keseluruhan, 39 film meraup lebih dari $1 miliar di seluruh dunia, lima di antaranya meraup lebih dari $2 miliar, dipuncaki oleh ''Avengers: Endgame''. Semua film ditayangkan (dan ditayangkan ulang) di bioskop pada abad ke-21. Film-film yang tidak diputar pada abad tersebut tidak masuk daftar karena terkena inflasi harga tiket. Jumlah penduduk dan tren membeli tiket tidak dipertimbangkan.
Baris 35 ⟶ 37:
|1
! scope="row" style="background:#b6fcb6;" | ''[[Avengers: Endgame]]'' {{†|alt=film masih diputar}}
| align="right" | $2,
| style="text-align:center;" data-sort-value="2019-04" | 2019
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="endgame">{{cite web|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=marvel2019.htm|title=Avengers: Endgame (2019)|website=[[Box Office Mojo]]|accessdate=July 21, 2019}}</ref><ref group="#" name="endgame peak">{{cite web |title=All Time Worldwide Box Office |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20190721161929/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ |archivedate=July 21, 2019}}</ref>
Baris 42 ⟶ 44:
|1
! scope="row" | ''[[Avatar (film 2009)|Avatar]]''
| align="right" | $2,
| style="text-align:center;" | 2009
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="avatar" /><ref group="#" name="avatar peak">{{cite web |title=All Time Worldwide Box Office |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101103063039/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world |archivedate=November 3, 2010}}</ref>
Baris 149 ⟶ 151:
| align="right" |{{ref |Fast 8|F8}}<!-- DO NOT CHANGE GROSS TO BOX OFFICE MOJO FIGURE WITHOUT DISCUSSING IT ON TALK PAGE FIRST. SEE ATTACHED NOTE FOR REASONS. -->$1,238,764,765
| style="text-align:center;" data-sort-value="2017-04" | 2017
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=The Fate of the Furious (2017-04-14) |website=[[Boxoffice (
|-
|18
Baris 205 ⟶ 207:
| align="right" | $1,108,561,013
| style="text-align:center;" data-sort-value="2012-10" | 2012
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=bond23.htm |title=Skyfall (2012) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=April 1, 2013 |archive-date=2017-02-06 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170206173057/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=bond23.htm |dead-url=yes }}</ref><ref group="#" name="Skyfall peak">{{cite web |title=All Time Worldwide Box Office |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130303064100/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ |archivedate=March 3, 2013}}</ref>
|-
|26
Baris 405 ⟶ 407:
== Film berpenghasilan tertinggi sesuai inflasi ==
[[
Karena dampak [[inflasi]] berjangka panjang, terutama kenaikan pesat harga tiket bioskop, daftar yang tidak disesuaikan dengan inflasi lebih memihak kepada film-film baru.<ref name="Bialik (2010-1-29)">{{cite news |last=Bialik |first=Carl |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-hollywood-box-office-records-are-made-889/ |title=How Hollywood Box-Office Records Are Made |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |date=January 29, 2010 |accessdate=August 9, 2011}}</ref> Daftar yang belum disesuaikan, sering dijumpai di media massa, tidak berguna apabila ingin membandingkan film-film yang rentang tahunnya jauh. Karena itu, banyak film-film lama yang tidak muncul lagi di daftar modern yang belum disesuaikan, padahal pendapatan komersialnya lebih tinggi apabila disesuaikan dengan kenaikan harga tiket.<ref name="Pincus-Roth (2009)">{{cite news |last=Pincus-Roth |first=Zachary |url=http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/summer_movies/2009/07/best_weekend_never.single.html |title=Best Weekend Never |work=[[Slate (
Hambatan lain adalah perilisan film dalam berbagai format dengan harga tiket yang berbeda. Contohnya, ''Avatar'' dirilis dalam format 3D dan IMAX: hampir dua per tiga tiket film ini berasal dari penayangan 3D dengan harga rata-rata $10, sedangkan seperenam lainnya berasal dari penayangan IMAX dengan harga rata-rata di atas $14.50, berbeda dengan harga rata-rata $7,61 untuk penayangan 2D tahun 2010.<ref name="Gray (2010-02-03)">{{cite web |first=Brandon |last=Gray |title='Avatar' Claims Highest Gross of All Time |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2667&p=l.htm |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=February 3, 2010}}</ref> Faktor sosial dan ekonomi seperti perubahan jumlah penduduk<ref name="Bialik (2010-1-30)">{{cite news |last=Bialik |first=Carl |url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704878904575031813961239170 |title=What It Takes for a Movie to Be No. 1 |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |date=January 30, 2010 |accessdate=August 9, 2011}}</ref> dan pertumbuhan pasar internasional<ref name="Kolesnikov-Jessop">{{cite news |last=Kolesnikov-Jessop |first=Sonia |title=Hollywood Presses Its Global Agenda |work=[[The New York Times]] |date=May 22, 2011 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/business/media/23film-screensingapore.html |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref><ref name="Hoad">{{cite news |last=Hoad |first=Phil |title=The rise of the international box office |work=[[The Guardian]] |date=August 11, 2011 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/filmblog/2011/aug/11/hollywood-international-box-office |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref><ref name="Frankel">{{cite news |last=Frankel |first=Daniel |title=Why the Foreign Box Office Leads: 'Fast Five,' 'Thor' Open Overseas First |work=[[The Wrap]] |date=May 1, 2011 |url=http://www.thewrap.com/movies/article/rise-foreign-box-office-why-fast-five-debuted-down-under-first-26957 |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref> turut memengaruhi jumlah orang yang membeli tiket bioskop, demografi penonton (beberapa film menjual lebih banyak tiket diskon untuk anak-anak), atau kelarisan/popularitas film di kota-kota besar yang harga tiketnya lebih mahal.<ref name="Pincus-Roth (2009)" />
Baris 413 ⟶ 415:
Sistem pengukuran keberhasilan sebuah film didasarkan pada penghasilan kotor tanpa penyesuaian. Alasannya, sistemnya memang seperti ini dari dulu mengikuti praktik industri perfilman: hasil penjualan tiket dihitung per bioskop dan diteruskan ke distributor, kemudian distributor merilis totalnya ke media massa.<ref name="Bialik (2007)">{{cite news |last=Bialik |first=Carl |url=https://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/box-office-records-are-the-stuff-of-legend-240/ |title=Box-Office Records Are the Stuff of 'Legend' |work=[[The Wall Street Journal]] |date=December 17, 2007 |accessdate=August 10, 2011}}</ref> Beralih ke sistem yang lebih adil yang menghitung penjualan tiket alih-alih hitungan kotor belum tentu cocok karena satu-satunya data yang tersedia untuk film lama adalah total penjualan tiket.<ref name="Bialik (2010-1-30)" /> Karena industri perfilman semakin mengutamakan pemasaran film-film yang baru dirilis, angka tanpa penyesuaian selalu dipakai di iklan-iklan supaya film ''blockbuster'' baru bisa meningkatkan penjualannya secara pesat dan merebut gelar "film top sepanjang masa".<ref name="LLU (2004)" /><ref name="Leonhardt">{{cite news |last=Leonhardt |first=David |title=Why 'Avatar' Is Not the Top-Grossing Film |date=March 1, 2010 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/why-avatar-is-not-the-top-grossing-film |accessdate=April 7, 2013}}</ref> Karena itu, sedikit sekali alasan untuk beralih ke sistem yang lebih ajeg dari sudut pandang pemasaran maupun pemberitaan.<ref name="Bialik (2007)" />
Meski ada penyesuaian inflasi agak menyulitkan, sejumlah pihak berusaha melakukannya. Perkiraan bergantung kepada [[indeks harga]] yang dipakai untuk menyesuaikan penghasilan kotor,<ref name="Leonhardt" /> lalu [[nilai tukar]] yang dipakai untuk menukarkan mata uang juga dapat memengaruhi penghitungan, keduanya dapat memengaruhi peringkat akhir dalam daftar yang sesuai inflasi. ''Gone with the Wind''—pertama dirilis tahun 1939—diakui secara luas sebagai film tersukses sepanjang masa. Pada tahun 2014, ''[[Guinness World Records]]'' memeprkirakan penghasilan kotor globalnya sesuai inflasi mencapai $3,4 miliar. Perkiraan penghasilan kotor sesuai inflasi ''Gone with the Wind'' sangat bervariasi; pemiliknya, [[Turner Entertainment]], memperkirakan penghasilan sesuai inflasinya $3,3 miliar pada 2007, beberapa tahun sebelum ''Guinness'';<ref name="gwtw tcm" /> perkiraan lainnya mencantumkan antara dua angka tersebut, ada yang mencantumkan kurang dari $3 miliar tahun 2010,<ref name="Shone">{{Cite news |first=Tom |last=Shone |authorlink=Tom Shone |title=Oscars 2010: How James Cameron took on the world |website=[[The Daily Telegraph]] |date=February 3, 2010 |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/oscars/7144424/Oscars-2010-How-James-Cameron-took-on-the-world.html |accessdate=March 22, 2012}}</ref> dan ada yang mencantumkan $3,8 miliar tahun 2006.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hill |first=George F. |title=Gone With The Wind, Indeed |date=June 25, 2006 |website=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/23/AR2006062301502.html |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20181227233419/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/23/AR2006062301502.html |archivedate=December 27, 2018}}</ref> Film pesaing ''Gone with the Wind'' bergantung kepada angka yang digunakan: ''Guinness'' meletakkan ''Avatar'' di peringkat kedua dengan penghasilan $3 miliar, sedangkan perkiraan lain meletakkan ''Titanic'' di peringkat kedua dengan penghasilan penayangan
:{{legend|#b6fcb6|''film masih diputar di bioskop di seluruh dunia satu pekan sejak {{Days before now|{{#switch: {{CURRENTDAYNAME}} |Saturday=1 |Sunday=2 |Monday=3 |Tuesday=4 |Wednesday=5 |Thursday=6 |0}}}}''.|text={{†|alt=film masih diputar}}}}<!--Please do not remove this, or else the highlighting in the table becomes unintelligible. The date is set to update every Friday according to UTC time.-->
Baris 430 ⟶ 432:
|-
| 2
! scope="row" | ''[[Titanic (film 1997)|Titanic]]''
| style="text-align:right;" |
| style="text-align:center;" | 1997
|-
| 3
! scope="row" | ''[[Avatar (film 2009)|Avatar]]''
| style="text-align:right;" | ${{formatnum:{{#expr:<!--2013-->2980314395<!--2014-->*1.007<!--2015-->*1.005<!--2016-->*1.015<!--2017-->*1.017<!--2018-->*1.017<!--2019-->*1.020 round -6}}}}
| style="text-align:center;" | 2009
|-
| 4
Baris 446 ⟶ 448:
| 5
! scope="row" style="background:#b6fcb6;" | ''[[Avengers: Endgame]]'' {{†|alt=film currently playing}}
| style="text-align:right;" | {{ref |Avengers Endgame|AE}}$
| style="text-align:center;" | 2019
|-
Baris 478 ⟶ 480:
{{note label|Inflation|Inf||Penyesuaian inflasi menggunakan [[indeks harga konsumen]] negara-negara maju versi [[Dana Moneter Internasional]].<ref>{{cite web |title=World Economic Outlook: Inflation rate, end of period consumer prices |publisher=[[International Monetary Fund]] |url=https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/PCPIEPCH@WEO/ADVEC |accessdate=May 10, 2019}}</ref> Indeks ini digunakan secara seragam ke semua penghasilan kotor di daftar ''Guinness World Records'' tahun 2014, dimulai dengan indeks 2014. Angka di tabel di atas mempertimbangkan inflasi tahun 2014 dan seterusnya.}}
{{note label|Titanic adjusted|T||Total penghasilan sesuai inflasi ''Titanic'' menurut ''Guinness'' naik $102.000.000 antara edisi 2012 (terbit tahun 2011) dan edisi 2015, kenaikan sebesar 4,2% diterapkan ke total penghasilan sesuai inflasi lainnya di tabel di atas dan tidak menghitung penghasilan kotor dari penayangan ulang 3D tahun 2012.<ref name="Guinness 2015" /><ref>{{cite book|editor-last=Glenday|editor-first=Craig|script-title=ru:Гиннесс. Мировые рекорды|trans-title=Guinness World Records |edition=2012 |year=2011 |publisher=[[Astrel]] |location=Moscow |isbn=978-5-271-36423-5 |page=211 |language=Russian |translator-last=Andrianov |translator-first=P.I. |translator-last2=Palova |translator-first2=I.V.}}</ref
{{note label|Avengers Endgame|AE||Karena ''Avengers: Endgame'' dirilis tahun ini, penghasilan kotornya tidak mengalami penyesuaian inflasi.}}
Baris 485 ⟶ 487:
== Film berpenghasilan tertinggi menurut tahun ==
{{Quote box
| title = {{anchor|distributor rental}}Glosarium: Sewa distributor
| quote = Angka box office dilaporkan dalam bentuk penghasilan kotor atau sewa distributor (''distributor rentals''). Sewa distributor lumrah di film-film lama. Orang sering salah mengira sewa sebagai penghasilan kaset. Sewa adalah porsi distributor dari total penghasilan film di bioskop. Singkatnya, penghasilan kotor box office dikurangi porsi bioskop.<ref name="Cones">{{cite book |last=Cones |first=John W. |title=The feature film distribution deal: a critical analysis of the single most important film industry agreement |publisher=[[Southern Illinois University Press]] |year=1997 |isbn=978-0-8093-2082-0 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EoeJ7VmwnDIC&pg=PA41 41] |quote=Distributor rentals: It is also important to know and recognize the difference between the distributor's gross receipts and the gross rentals. The term "rentals" refers to the aggregate amount of the film distributor's share of monies paid at theatre box offices computed on the basis of negotiated agreements between the distributor and the exhibitor. Note that gross receipts refers to amounts actually received and from all markets and media, whereas gross rentals refers to amounts earned from theatrical exhibition only, regardless of whether received by the distributor. Thus, gross receipts is the much broader term and includes distributor rentals. The issue of film rentals (i.e., what percentage of a film's box office gross comes back to the distributor) is of key importance...More current numbers suggest that distributor rentals for the major studio/distributor released films average in the neighborhood of 43% of box office gross. Again, however, such an average is based on widely divergent distributor rental ratios on individual films.}}</ref><ref name="Marich">{{cite book |last=Marich |first=Robert |title=Marketing to moviegoers: a handbook of strategies used by major studios and independents |publisher=[[Southern Illinois University Press]] |edition=2 |year=2009 |origyear=1st. pub. [[Focal Press]]:2005 |isbn=9780809328840 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_6USFaYxyeUC&pg=PA252 252]<!--If page link dies, try [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=f1SQIZOffhoC&pg=pa232 232]--> |quote=Rentals are the distributors' share of the box office gross and typically set by a complex, two-part contract.}}</ref> Harga sewa dari dulu berkisar 30–40% apabila distributornya memiliki jaringan bioskop, kurang lebih sepertiga penghasilan kotor yang dibayarkan ke distributor film.<ref name="Balio">{{cite book |last=Balio |first=Tino |title=The American film industry |publisher=[[University of Wisconsin Press]] |year=2005 |isbn=978-0-299-09874-2 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=OBpDf_uUp30C&pg=pa296 296] |quote=Film Rentals as Percent of Volume of Business (1939): 36.4}}</ref> Di pasar modern, harga sewa bisa bervariasi jauh—ada beberapa faktor—tetapi harga sewa film-film dari studio besar rata-rata 43%.<ref name="Cones"/>
| align = right
| salign = right
| width = 20em;
| bgcolor = #F0EAD6;
}}
Selera penonton cukup beragam pada abad ke-20, tetapi ada beberapa tren yang berkembang. Pada masa [[film bisu]], film-film [[film perang|bertema perang]] sangat digemari penonton. ''The Birth of a Nation'' ([[Perang Saudara Amerika Serikat]]), ''The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse'', ''The Big Parade'', dan ''Wings'' (tiga-tiganya [[Perang Dunia I]]) menjadi film tersukses pada masing-masing tahun rilisnya. Tren film perang ini ditutup oleh ''All Quiet on the Western Front'' tahun 1930. Seiring munculnya [[film bersuara]] tahun 1927, [[film musikal|musikal]]—genre yang cocok untuk memamerkan teknologi baru ini—menjadi jenis film yang paling populer. 1928 dan 1929 dikuasai oleh film musikal. Genre ini terus bertahan pada 1930-an, tetapi [[Perang Dunia II]] kembali memopulerkan film-film bertema perang, dimulai oleh ''Gone with the Wind'' (Perang Saudara AS) tahun 1939 dan ditutup oleh ''The Best Years of Our Lives'' (Perang Dunia II) tahun 1946. ''Samson and Delilah'' (1949) merintis tren [[daftar film drama sejarah|drama sejarah]] [[Romawi Kuno]]/[[Sejarah Israel kuno dan Yudea|Kristen]] pada 1950-an ketika bioskop dan televisi berlomba-lomba menarik perhatian penonton.<ref>{{cite book |last=Balio |first=Tino |year=1987 |title=United Artists: the Company that Changed the Film Industry |publisher=[[University of Wisconsin Press]] |isbn=978-0-299-11440-4 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=9EeK5s3aw44C&pg=PA124#v=twopage 124–125] |quote=To rekindle interest in the movies, Hollywood not only had to compete with television but also with other leisure-time activities...Movies made a comeback by 1955, but audiences had changed. Moviegoing became a special event for most people, creating the phenomenon of the big picture.}}</ref> ''Quo Vadis'', ''The Robe'', ''The Ten Commandments'', ''Ben-Hur'', dan ''Spartacus'' menjadi film berpenghasilan tertinggi pada masanya saat penayangan perdana. Genre ini perlahan ditinggalkan setelah sejumlah film besar merugi.<ref name="HallNeale179">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA179 179]. "Later epics proved far more disastrous for the backers. Samuel Bronston's ''The Fall of the Roman Empire'', filmed in Spain, cost $17,816,876 and grossed only $1.9 million in America. George Stevens's long-gestating life of Christ, ''The Greatest Story Ever Told'' (1965), which had been in planning since 1954 and in production since 1962, earned domestic rentals of $6,962,715 on a $21,481,745 negative cost, the largest amount yet spent on a production made entirely within the United States. ''The Bible—in the Beginning''... (1966) was financed by the Italian producer Dino De Laurentiis from private investors and Swiss banks. He then sold distribution rights outside Italy jointly to Fox and Seven Arts for $15 million (70 percent of which came from Fox), thereby recouping the bulk of his $18 million investment. Although ''The Bible'' returned a respectable world rental of $25.3 million, Fox was still left with a net loss of just over $1.5 million. It was the last biblical epic to be released by any major Hollywood studio for nearly twenty years."}}</ref> Kesuksesan ''White Christmas'' dan ''South Pacific'' tahun 1950-an menjadi awal kebangkitan musikal pada tahun 1960-an. ''West Side Story'', ''Mary Poppins'', ''My Fair Lady'', ''The Sound of Music'', dan ''Funny Girl'' menjadi film tersukses dalam dekade itu. Tahun 1970-an, selera penonton beralih ke film-film [[konsep tinggi]]. Enam film besutan [[George Lucas]] atau [[Steven Spielberg]] menjadi film tersukses sepanjang 1980-an. Pada abad ke-21, industri perfilman semakin bergantung kepada seri dan [[adaptasi film|adaptasi]]. Film-film box office didominasi oleh film yang diangkat dari kekayaan intelektual yang sudah terbit lebih dulu.<ref>{{cite web |first=Trey |last=Williams |title=Ridley Scott's latest 'Alien' announcement drives Hollywood's sequel problem |date=September 25, 2015 |website=[[MarketWatch]] |url=http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ridley-scotts-latest-alien-announcement-drives-hollywoods-sequel-problem-2015-09-25 |accessdate=May 12, 2016}}</ref>
[[Berkas:Steven Spielberg by Gage Skidmore.jpg|jmpl|lurus|kiri|Film-film yang disutradarai Steven Spielberg sudah enam kali menyandang gelar "film berpenghasilan tertinggi tahun ini" dan tiga kali memegang gelar "film berpenghasilan tertinggi sepanjang masa".|alt=Foto laki-laki paruh baya berkacamata.]]
Steven Spielberg adalah sutradara yang paling banyak terwakili di tabel ini (6 film) dan menempati peringkat pertama tahun 1975, 1981, 1982, 1984, 1989, dan 1993. [[Cecil B. DeMille]] (1932, 1947, 1949, 1952, dan 1956) dan [[William Wyler]] (1942, 1946, 1959, dan 1968) masing-masing menempati peringkat kedua (5 film) dan ketiga (4 film), sedangkan [[D. W. Griffith]] (1915, 1916, dan 1920), [[George Roy Hill]] (1966, 1969, dan 1973), [[James Cameron]] (1991, 1997, dan 2009), dan [[Russo Brothers]] (2016, 2018, dan 2019) masing-masing diwakili oleh 3 film. George Lucas menyutradarai dua film di tabel ini tahun 1977 dan 1999, tetapi juga menjabat sebagai produser dan penulis naskah untuk film tahun 1980, 1981, 1983, 1984, dan 1989. Sutradara berikut ini juga menyutradarai dua film di tabel ini: [[Frank Lloyd]], [[King Vidor]], [[Frank Capra]], [[Michael Curtiz]], [[Leo McCarey]], [[Alfred Hitchcock]], [[David Lean]], [[Stanley Kubrick]], [[Guy Hamilton]], [[Mike Nichols]], [[William Friedkin]], [[Peter Jackson]], [[Gore Verbinski]], dan [[Michael Bay]]; [[Mervyn LeRoy]], [[Ken Annakin]], dan [[Robert Wise]] masing-masing diwakili oleh satu film solo dan satu film bersama, sedangkan [[John Ford]] menyutradarai dua film. Film-film Disney biasanya disutradarai beberapa orang. Sejumlah sutradara pernah terlibat dalam produksi film berpenghasilan tertinggi: [[Wilfred Jackson]], [[Hamilton Luske]], [[Clyde Geronimi]], [[David Hand (animator)|David Hand]], [[Ben Sharpsteen]], [[Wolfgang Reitherman]], dan Bill Roberts menyutradarai sedikitnya dua film dalam tabel ini. Hanya tujuh sutradara yang berturut-turut memegang gelar film berpenghasilan tertinggi: McCarey (1944 dan 1945), Nichols (1966 dan 1967), Spielberg (1981 dan 1982), Jackson (2002 dan 2003) Verbinski (2006 dan 2007), dan Russo Brothers (2018 dan 2019).
Karena ada beberapa jadwal rilis—apalagi ketika filmnya dirilis menjelang akhir tahun—dan pola rilis di seluruh dunia, banyak film yang masa rilisnya merentang selama dua tahun kalender atau lebih. Lantas, penghasilan kotor yang dicantumkan di sini tidak terbatas kepada tahun rilisnya. Penghasilan kotor juga tidak terbatas kepada penayangan perdananya di bioskop. Film lama biasanya dirilis ulang secara rutin sehingga angka di tabel mencakup seluruh masa rilis film sejak penayangan perdana; penghasilan kotor perdana film dicantumkan dalam kurung setelah totalnya (jika diketahui). Karena datanya tidak lengkap, jumlah uang yang dihasilkan dan masa penghasilan beberapa film tidak bisa dipastikan. Namun, tabel ini secara umum merunut film-film yang meraup penghasilan tertinggi setiap tahun. Apabila perkiraannya saling berseberangan, kedua film akan dicantumkan. Apabila sebuah film masuk peringkat pertama karena dirilis ulang, pemegang rekor sebelumnya juga dicantumkan.
:{{legend|#b6fcb6|''film masih diputar di bioskop di seluruh dunia satu pekan sejak {{Days before now|{{#switch: {{CURRENTDAYNAME}} |Saturday=1 |Sunday=2 |Monday=3 |Tuesday=4 |Wednesday=5 |Thursday=6 |0}}}}''.|text={{†|alt=film masih diputar}}}}<!--Please do not remove this, or else the highlighting in the table becomes unintelligible. The date is set to update every Friday according to UTC time.-->
{{clear}}
{| class="wikitable plainrowheaders" style="margin:auto; margin:auto;"
|+Film berpenghasilan tertinggi menurut tahun penayangan<ref>{{cite web |title=Yearly Box Office |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/?view2=worldwide&view=releasedate&p=.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Movie Index By Year |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies |accessdate=January 6, 2012}}</ref><ref name="Dirks (year)">{{cite web |last=Dirks |first=Tim |website=[[Filmsite.org]] |publisher=[[AMC Networks|American Movie Classics]] |title=All-Time Box-Office Hits By Decade and Year |url=http://www.filmsite.org/boxoffice2.html |accessdate=January 5, 2012}}{{cbignore}}</ref>
! scope="col" | Tahun
! scope="col" | Judul
! scope="col" | Penghasilan kotor global
! scope="col" | Biaya produksi
! scope="col" | Referensi
|-
! scope="row" | [[1915 dalam film|1915]]
|''[[The Birth of a Nation]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}–{{nts|100000000}}<br />{{nts|prefix=$|20000000}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|5200000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|110000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Monaco |first=James |title=How to Read a Film:Movies, Media, and Beyond |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2009 |isbn=9780199755790 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bgbOsjnppAcC&pg=PA262 262] |quote=The Birth of a Nation, costing an unprecedented and, many believed, thoroughly foolhardy $110,000, eventually returned $20 million and more. The actual figure is hard to calculate because the film was distributed on a "states' rights" basis in which licenses to show the film were sold outright. The actual cash generated by The Birth of a Nation may have been as much as $50 million to $100 million, an almost inconceivable amount for such an early film.}}</ref><ref name="Wasko" group="#">{{cite book |last=Wasko |first=Janet |chapter=D.W. Griffiths and the banks: a case study in film financing |editor-last=Kerr |editor-first=Paul |title=The Hollywood Film Industry: A Reader |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=1986 |isbn=9780710097309 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jMINAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA34 34] |quote=Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a 'conservative estimate'. For years ''Variety'' has listed ''The Birth of a Nation''{{'}}s total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This 'trade legend' has finally been acknowledged by ''Variety'' as a 'whopper myth', and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |editor-last=Lang |editor-first=Robert |title=The Birth of a nation: D.W. Griffith, director |publisher=[[Rutgers University Press]] |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-8135-2027-8 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rKOgVk13vawC&pg=PA30 30] |quote=The film eventually cost $110,000 and was twelve reels long.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1916 dalam film|1916]]
|''[[Intolerance (film)|Intolerance]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Intolerance|IN}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|489653}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="BlockWilson26">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA26 26]}}.
* ''Intolerance'': "Domestic Rentals: $1.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''Cleopatra'': "Domestic Rentals: $0.5; Production Cost: $0.3 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref><ref group="#">{{citation |last=Birchard |first=Robert S. |title=Intolerance |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA45 45] |quote=Intolerance was the most expensive American film made up until that point, costing a total of $489,653, and its performance at the box ... but it did recoup its cost and end with respectable overall numbers.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1917 dalam film|1917]]
|''[[Cleopatra (film 1917)|Cleopatra]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|300000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="BlockWilson26" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1918 dalam film|1918]]
|''[[Mickey (film 1918)|Mickey]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8000000}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="mickey">{{cite news |last=Coons |first=Robin |work=[[The Daytona Beach News-Journal]] |title=Hollywood Chatter |date=June 30, 1939 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=eHIoAAAAIBAJ&sjid=C8cEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4926%2C5479066 6]}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1919 dalam film|1919]]
|''[[The Miracle Man (film 1919)|The Miracle Man]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|120000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Shipman |first=David |title=The great movie stars: the golden years |publisher=[[Crown Publishing Group]] |year=1970 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=yuK0AAAAIAAJ&q=%22the+miracle+man%22+%22grossed+world-wide+over+$3+million%22 98] |quote=It was a low budgeter—$120,000—but it grossed world-wide over $3 million and made stars of Chaney and his fellow-players, Betty Compson and Thomas Meighan.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1920 dalam film|1920]]
|''[[Way Down East]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|4000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref name="Variety (1932)" group="#">{{cite news |title=Biggest Money Pictures |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_variety_1932-06-21_107_2/page/1 |work=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]] |date=June 21, 1932 |page=1}} Cited in {{cite web |title=Biggest Money Pictures |publisher=Cinemaweb |url=http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/7_v_32_4.htm |accessdate=July 14, 2011 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110708155503/http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/7_v_32_4.htm |archivedate=July 8, 2011}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Solomon (2011)" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1921 dalam film|1921]]
|''[[The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (film)|The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|4000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|600000}}–{{nts|800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA53 53]}}. "''The Four Forsemen of the Apocalypse'' was to become Metro's most expensive production and one of the decade's biggest box-office hits. Its production costs have been estimated at "something between $600,000 and $800,000." ''Variety'' estimated its worldwide gross at $4 million in 1925 and at $5 million in 1944; in 1991, it estimated its cumulative domestic rentals at $3,800,000."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1922 dalam film|1922]]
|''[[Robin Hood (film 1922)|Robin Hood]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2500000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|930042.78}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Brownlow |first=Kevin |title=The parade's gone by .. |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |year=1968 |isbn=978-0-520-03068-8 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wCD5EH64Qw8C&pg=PA255 255] |quote=The negative cost was about $986,000, which did not include Fairbanks' own salary. Once the exploitation and release prints were taken into account, ''Robin Hood'' cost about $1,400,000—exceeding both ''Intolerance'' ($700,000) and the celebrated "million dollar movie" ''Foolish Wives''. But it earned $2,500,000.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Vance |first=Jeffrey |title=Douglas Fairbanks |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |year=2008 |isbn=9780520256675 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=e3DVBxGQ95YC&pg=PA146 146] |quote=The film had a production cost of $930,042.78—more than the cost of D.W. Griffith's ''Intolerance'' and nearly as much as Erich von Stroheim's ''Foolish Wives'' (1922).}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1923 dalam film|1923]]
|''[[The Covered Wagon]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Time (1925)">{{cite journal |title=Business: Film Exports |journal=[[Time (majalah)|Time]] |date=July 6, 1925 |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,728553,00.html |accessdate=July 12, 2011 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101105030518/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,728553,00.html |archivedate=November 5, 2010 |deadurl=no |url-access=subscription }}</ref><ref group="#" name="Birchard (2009)" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1924 dalam film|1924]]
|''[[The Sea Hawk (film 1924)|The Sea Hawk]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|700000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Time (1925)" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1925 dalam film|1925]]
|''[[The Big Parade]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18000000}}–{{nts|22000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} <br> ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:4990000+1141000}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|382000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="May (2005)">{{Citation |last=May |first=Richard P. |title=Restoring The Big Parade |journal=The Moving Image |volume=5 |issue=2 |pages=140–146 |issn=1532-3978 |doi=10.1353/mov.2005.0033 |date=Fall 2005 |quote=...earning somewhere between $18 and $22 million, depending on the figures consulted}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Robertson |first=Patrick |title=Guinness Book of Movie Facts and Feats |publisher=[[Abbeville Publishing Group]] |year=1991 |edition=4 |isbn=9781558592360 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jdjsQY5qkbEC&q=%22samson+and+delilah%22+worldwide+million+rentals 30] |quote=The top grossing silent film was King Vidor's ''The Big Parade'' (US 25), with worldwide rentals of $22 million.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA58#v=twopage 58–59]}}. "Even then, at a time when the budget for a feature averaged at around $300,000, no more than $382,000 was spent on production...According to the Eddie Mannix Ledger at MGM, it grossed $4,990,000 domestically and $1,141,000 abroad."</ref>
|-
|''[[Ben-Hur (film 1925)|Ben-Hur]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10738000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|9386000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3967000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Ben-Hur (1925)">{{cite web |title=Ben-Hur (1925) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/35/Ben-Hur/notes.html |accessdate=December 19, 2017}}</ref><ref group="#" name="HallNeale163">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA163 163]. "MGM's silent ''Ben-Hur'', which opened at the end of 1925, had out-grossed all the other pictures released by the company in 1926 combined. With worldwide rentals of $9,386,000 on first release it was, with the sole possible exception of ''The Birth of a Nation'', the highest-earning film of the entire silent era. (At a negative cost of $3,967,000, it was also the most expensive.)"}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1926 dalam film|1926]]
|''[[For Heaven's Sake (film 1926)|For Heaven's Sake]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2600000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |For Heaven's Sake|FH}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Variety (1932)" /><ref group="#">{{cite web |last=Miller |first=Frank |title=For Heaven's Sake (1926) – Articles |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/410794/For-Heaven-s-Sake/articles.html |accessdate=January 15, 2012}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1927 dalam film|1927]]
|''[[Wings (film 1927)|Wings]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3600000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Variety (1932)" /><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA188#v=onepage&q=wings%20%242%20million 188]}}. "At a cost of $2 million ''Wings'' was the studio's most expensive movie of the decade, and though it did well it was not good enough to earn a profit."</ref><ref group="#" name="Jolson" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1928 dalam film|1928]]
|''[[The Singing Fool]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5900000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|388000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Jolson">''The Jazz Singer'' and ''The Singing Fool''
* {{citation |last=Block |first=Hayley Taylor |title=The Jazz Singer |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA113 113] |quote=The film brought in $2.6 million in worldwide rentals and made a net profit of $1,196,750. Jolson's follow-up Warner Bros. film, ''The Singing Fool'' (1928), brought in over two times as much, with $5.9 in worldwide rentals and a profit of $3,649,000, making them two of the most profitable films in the 1920s.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#" name="Crafton">{{cite book |last=Crafton |first=Donald |title=The Talkies: American Cinema's Transition to Sound, 1926–1931 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |year=1999 |isbn=9780520221284 |pages=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KFB_oT-jupQC&pg=PA549 549]–552 |quote=''The Singing Fool'': Negative Cost ($1000s): 388}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1929 dalam film|1929]]
|''[[The Broadway Melody]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4400000}}–{{nts|4800000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|379000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{citation |last=Birchard |first=Robert S. |title=The Broadway Melody |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA121 121] |quote=It earned $4.4 million in worldwide rentals and was the first movie to spawn sequels (there were several until 1940).}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#" name="bradley">{{Cite book |last=Bradley |first=Edwin M. |title=The First Hollywood Musicals: A Critical Filmography of 171 Features, 1927 Through 1932 |publisher=[[McFarland & Company]] |year=2004 |origyear=1st. pub. 1996 |isbn=9780786420292}}
* ''The Singing Fool'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Rg-UBJaPD-sC&pg=PA12 12]. "Ego aside, Jolson was at the top of his powers in ''The Singing Fool''. The $150,000 Warner Bros. paid him to make it, and the $388,000 it took to produce the film, were drops in the hat next to the film's world gross of $5.9 million. Its $3.8-million gross in this country set a box-office record that would not be surpassed until Walt Disney's ''Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs'' (1937)."
* ''The Broadway Melody'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Rg-UBJaPD-sC&pg=PA24 24]. "''The Broadway Melody'' with a negative cost of $379,000, grossed $2.8 million in the United States, $4.8 million worldwide, and made a recorded profit of $1.6 million for MGM."
* ''Gold Diggers of Broadway'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Rg-UBJaPD-sC&q=%22gold%20diggers%20of%20broadway%22%20worldwide 58]. "It grossed an impressive $2.5 million domestically and nearly $4 million worldwide."</ref>
|-
|''[[Sunny Side Up (film 1929)|Sunny Side Up]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Sunny Side Up|SS}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|600000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Solomon (1988)" /><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA46 46]}}. "Production Cost: $0.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1930 dalam film|1930]]
|''[[All Quiet on the Western Front (film 1930)|All Quiet on the Western Front]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1250000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Variety (1932)" /><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Cormack |first=Mike |title=Ideology and Cinematography in Hollywood, 1930–1939 |publisher=[[Palgrave Macmillan]] |year=1993 |isbn=9780312100674 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=w0JSFWpr2gAC&pg=PA28 28] |quote=Although costing $1250000—a huge sum for any studio in 1929—the film was a financial success. Karl Thiede gives the domestic box-office at $1500000, and the same figure for the foreign gross.}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Balio (1996)" /><ref group="#" name="Balio (1976)">''Hell's Angels''
* {{cite book |last=Balio |first=Tino |title=United Artists: The Company Built by the Stars |publisher=[[University of Wisconsin Press]] |year=1976 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=QljKdIYzncoC&pg=PA110 110] |quote=Hughes did not have the "Midas touch" the trade press so often attributed to him. ''Variety'', for example, reported that ''Hell's Angels'' cost $3.2 million to make, and by July, 1931, eight months after its release, the production cost had nearly been paid off. Keats claimed the picture cost $4 million to make and that it earned twice that much within twenty years. The production cost estimate is probably correct. Hughes worked on the picture for over two years, shooting it first as a silent and then as a talkie. Lewis Milestone said that in between Hughes experimented with shooting it in color as well. But ''Variety'''s earnings report must be the fabrication of a delirious publicity agent, and Keats' the working of a myth maker. During the seven years it was in United Artists distribution, ''Hell's Angels'' grossed $1.6 million in the domestic market, of which Hughes' share was $1.2 million. Whatever the foreign gross was, it seems unlikely that it was great enough to earn a profit for the picture.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1931 dalam film|1931]]
|''[[Frankenstein (film 1931)|Frankenstein]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|12000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|1400000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |last=Feaster |first=Felicia |title=Frankenstein (1931) |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/373967%7C18617/Frankenstein.html |accessdate=July 4, 2011}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA163&q=%22worldwide+rentals%22 163]}}. "It drew $1.4 million in worldwide rentals in its first run versus $1.2 million for ''Dracula'', which had opened in February 1931."</ref>
|-
|''[[City Lights]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1607351}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Vance |first=Jeffrey |title=Chaplin: genius of the cinema |publisher=[[Abrams Books]] |year=2003 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=uX5ZAAAAMAAJ&q=%22Chaplin's+negative+cost+for+City+Lights+was+$1,607,351.+The+film+eventually+earned+him+a+worldwide+profit+of+$5+million+($2+million+domestically+and+$3+million+in+foreign+distribution)%22 208] |quote=Chaplin's negative cost for City Lights was $1,607,351. The film eventually earned him a worldwide profit of $5 million ($2 million domestically and $3 million in foreign distribution), an enormous sum of money for the time.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1932 dalam film|1932]]
|''[[The Sign of the Cross (film 1932)|The Sign of the Cross]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2738993}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|694065}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Birchard (2009)" /><ref group="#" name="IMPA (1937)">{{cite journal |editor-last=Ramsaye |editor-first=Terry |title=The All-Time Best Sellers – Motion Pictures |journal=International Motion Picture Almanac 1937–38 |year=1937 |pages=[https://archive.org/stream/international193738quig#page/942/mode/2up 942–943] |quote=''Kid from Spain'': $2,621,000 (data supplied by Eddie Cantor)}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Sedgwick" /><ref group="#" name="shanghai">''Shanghai Express''
* {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA165 165]}}. "''Shanghai Express'' was Dietrich's biggest hit in America, bringing in $1.5 million in worldwide rentals."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="4" | [[1933 dalam film|1933]]
|''[[King Kong (film 1933)|King Kong]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:1856000+306000+685000+2500000}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|1856000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|672,255.75}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''King Kong''
* {{cite journal |first=Richard |last=Jewel |title=RKO Film Grosses: 1931–1951 |journal=Historical Journal of Film Radio and Television |volume=14 |issue=1 |year=1994 |page=39 |quote=1933 release: $1,856,000; 1938 release: $306,000; 1944 release: $685,000}}
* {{cite web |title=King Kong (1933) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2690/King-Kong/notes.html |accessdate=January 7, 2012 |quote=1952 release: $2,500,000; budget: $672,254.75}}</ref>
|-
|''[[I'm No Angel]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:2250000+1000000}}}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=I'm No Angel (1933) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/79021/I-m-No-Angel/notes.html |accessdate=January 7, 2012 |quote=According to a modern source, it had a gross earning of $2,250,000 on the North American continent, with over a million more earned internationally.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA188&q=angel%20rock-bottom%20cost 188]}}. "The studio released its most profitable pictures of the decade in 1933, ''She Done Him Wrong'' and ''I'm No Angel'', written by and starring Mae West. Produced at a rock-bottom cost of $200,000 each, they undoubtedly helped Paramount through the worst patch in its history..."</ref>
|-
|''[[Cavalcade (film 1933)|Cavalcade]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}–{{nts|4000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1116000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Solomon (2011)">{{cite book |last=Solomon |first=Aubrey |title=The Fox Film Corporation, 1915–1935: A History and Filmography |year=2011 |publisher=[[McFarland & Company]] |isbn=9780786462865}}
* ''Way Down East'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zospQ7o5u0oC&pg=PA52 52]. "D.W. Griffith's ''Way Down East'' (1920) was projected to return rentals of $4,000,000 on an $800,000 negative. This figure was based on the amounts earned from its roadshow run, coupled with its playoff in the rest of the country's theaters. Griffith had originally placed the potential film rental at $3,000,000 but, because of the success of the various roadshows that were running the $4,000,000 total was expected. The film showed a profit of $615,736 after just 23 weeks of release on a gross of $2,179,613."
* ''What Price Glory?'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zospQ7o5u0oC&pg=PA122&q=What%20Price%20Glory%20hit%20the%20jackpot%20with%20massive%20world%20rentals%20of%20%242%2C429%2C000%2C%20the%20highest%20figure%20in%20the%20history%20of%20the%20company.%20Since%20it%20was%20also%20the%20most%20expensive%20production%20of%20the%20year%20at%20%24817%2C000%20the%20profit%20was%20still%20a%20healthy%20%24796%2C000 112]. "What Price Glory hit the jackpot with massive world rentals of $2,429,000, the highest figure in the history of the company. Since it was also the most expensive production of the year at $817,000 the profit was still a healthy $796,000..."
* ''Cavalcade'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zospQ7o5u0oC&pg=PA170 170]. "The actual cost of ''Cavalcade'' was $1,116,000 and it was most definitely not guaranteed a success. In fact, if its foreign grosses followed the usual 40 percent of domestic returns, the film would have lost money. In a turnaround, the foreign gross was almost double the $1,000,000 domestic take to reach total world rentals of $3,000,000 and Fox's largest profit of the year at $664,000."
* ''State Fair'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zospQ7o5u0oC&pg=PA170 170]. "''State Fair'' did turn out to be a substantial hit with the help of Janet Gaynor boosting Will Rogers back to the level of money-making star. Its prestige engagements helped raked in a total $1,208,000 in domestic rentals. Surprisingly, in foreign countries unfamiliar with state fairs, it still earned a respectable $429,000. With its total rentals, the film ended up showing a $398,000 profit."</ref><ref group="#" name="Balio (1996)">{{cite book |last=Balio |first=Tino |year=1996 |title=Grand Design: Hollywood as a Modern Business Enterprise, 1930–1939 |volume=Volume 5 of History of the American Cinema |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |isbn=9780520203341}}
* ''Cavalcade'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_J9HTLOI08wC&pg=PA182 182]. "Produced by Winfield Sheehan at a cost of $1.25 million, ''Cavalcade'' won Academy Awards for best picture, director, art direction and grossed close to $4 million during its first release, much of which came from Great Britain and the Empire."
* ''Whoopee'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_J9HTLOI08wC&pg=PA212 212]. "Produced by Sam Goldwyn at a cost of $1 million, the picture was an adaptation of a smash musical comedy built around Eddie Cantor...A personality-centered musical, ''Whoopee!'' made little attempt to integrate the comedy routines, songs, and story. Nonetheless, Cantor's feature-film debut grossed over $2.6 million worldwide and started a popular series that included ''Palmy Days'' (1931), ''The Kid from Spain'' (1932), and ''Roman Scandals'' (1933)."</ref>
|-
|''[[She Done Him Wrong]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|274076}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="BlockWilson173">{{citation |last=Block |first=Alex Ben |title=She Done Him Wrong |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA173 173] |quote=The worldwide rentals of over $3 million keep the lights on at Paramount, which did not shy away from selling the movie's sex appeal.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#" name="Phillips (2008)">{{cite book |last=Phillips |first=Kendall R. |title=Controversial Cinema: The Films That Outraged America |year=2008 |publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]] |isbn=9781567207248 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ViQzDunkm9QC&pg=PA26 26] |quote=The reaction to West's first major film, however, was not exclusively negative. Made for a mere $200,000, the film would rake in a healthy $2 million in the United States and an additional million in overseas markets.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA135 135]}}. "Total production cost: $274,076 (Unadjusted $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1934 dalam film|1934]]
|''[[The Merry Widow (film 1934)|The Merry Widow]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:2608000}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1605000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Turk" /><ref group="#" name="Sedgwick" />
|-
|''[[It Happened One Night]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |One Night|ON}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|325000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{Cite book |last=McBride |first=Joseph |title=Frank Capra: The Catastrophe of Success |publisher=[[University Press of Mississippi]] |year=2011 |isbn=9781604738384 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DMkLpTFBEtUC&pg=PA309 309] |quote=According to the studio's books ''It Happened One Night'' brought in $1 million in film rentals during its initial release, but as Joe Walker pointed out, the figure would have been much larger if the film had not been sold to theaters on a block-booking basis in a package with more than two dozen lesser Columbia films, and the total rentals of the package spread among them all, as was customary in that era, since it minimized the risk and allowed the major studios to dominate the marketplace.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{Cite book |last=Dick |first=Bernard F. |title=Claudette Colbert: She Walked in Beauty |publisher=[[University Press of Mississippi]] |year=2008 |isbn=9781604730876 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=P3P9efYabOQC&pg=PA79 79] |quote=Although Columbia's president, Harry Cohn, had strong reservations about ''It Happened One Night'', he also knew that it would not bankrupt the studio; the rights were only $5,000, and the budget was set at $325,000, including the performers' salaries.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1935 dalam film|1935]]
|''[[Mutiny on the Bounty (film 1935)|Mutiny on the Bounty]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4460000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1905000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Sedgwick" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1936 dalam film|1936]]
|''[[San Francisco (film 1936)|San Francisco]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:5273000+124000+647000}}}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|5273000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1300000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Turk">{{cite book |last=Turk |first=Edward Baron |title=Hollywood Diva: A Biography of Jeanette MacDonald |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |year=2000 |origyear=1st. pub. 1998 |isbn=9780520222533}}
* ''The Merry Widow'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ojOxCgHZLpUC&pg=PA361 361] Cost: $1,605,000. Earnings: domestic $861,000; foreign $1,747,000; total $2,608,000. Loss: $113,000.
* ''San Francisco'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ojOxCgHZLpUC&pg=PA364 364] Cost: $1,300,000. Earnings: domestic $2,868,000; foreign $2,405,000; total $5,273,000. Profit: $2,237,000. [Reissues in 1938–39 and 1948–49 brought profits of $124,000 and $647,000 respectively.]</ref><ref group="#" name="Sedgwick">{{cite book |last=Sedgwick |first=John |title=Popular Filmgoing In 1930s Britain: A Choice of Pleasures |publisher=[[University of Exeter Press]] |year=2000 |isbn=9780859896603 |pages=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YsUfc8Ijb-wC&pg=PA146 146]–148 |quote=Sources: Eddie Mannix Ledger, made available to the author by Mark Glancy...}}
* ''Grand Hotel'': Production Cost $000s: 700; Distribution Cost $000s: 947; US box-office $000s: 1,235; Foreign box-office $000s: 1,359; Total box-office $000s: 2,594; Profit $000s: 947.
* ''The Merry Widow'': Production Cost $000s: 1,605; Distribution Cost $000s: 1,116; US box-office $000s: 861; Foreign box-office $000s: 1,747; Total box-office $000s: 2,608; Profit $000s: -113.
* ''Viva Villa'': Production Cost $000s: 1,022; Distribution Cost $000s: 766; US box-office $000s: 941; Foreign box-office $000s: 934; Total box-office $000s: 1,875; Profit $000s: 87.
* ''Mutiny on the Bounty'': Production Cost $000s: 1,905; Distribution Cost $000s: 1,646; US box-office $000s: 2,250; Foreign box-office $000s: 2,210; Total box-office $000s: 4,460; Profit $000s: 909.
* ''San Francisco'': Production Cost $000s: 1,300; Distribution Cost $000s: 1,736; US box-office $000s: 2,868; Foreign box-office $000s: 2,405; Total box-office $000s: 5,273; Profit $000s: 2,237.</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1937 dalam film|1937]]
|''[[Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (film 1937)|Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:418000000}}}}+{{ref |Snow White|S7}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:4200000+4300000}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1488423}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs''
* {{cite book |last=Monaco |first=Paul |title=A History of American Movies: A Film-By-Film Look at the Art, Craft, and Business of Cinema |publisher=[[Scarecrow Press]] |year=2010 |isbn=9780810874343 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=tgnKY6k5tHYC&pg=PA54 54] |quote=Considered a highly risky gamble when the movie was in production in the mid-1930s, by the fiftieth anniversary of its 1937 premiere ''Snow White'''s earnings exceeded $330 million.}}
* {{cite book |last1=Wilhelm |first1=Henry Gilmer |last2=Brower |first2=Carol |title=The Permanence and Care of Color Photographs: Traditional and Digital Color Prints, Color Negatives, Slides, and Motion Pictures |publisher=Preservation Pub |year=1993 |isbn=978-0911515008 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0OtTAAAAMAAJ&dq=%22snow+white%22+million+worldwide+grosses 359] |quote=In only 2 months after the 1987 re-release, the film grossed another $45 million—giving it a total gross to date of about $375 million!}}
* {{cite web |title=Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1987 Re-issue) |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/9400/snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-1987-re-issue |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=North American box-office: $46,594,719}}
* {{cite web |title=Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1993 Re-issue) |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/9401/snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs-1993-re-issue |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=North American box-office: $41,634,791}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Snow White & Pinocchio">''Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs'' and ''Pinocchio''
* {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}
::p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA207&q=When%20the%20budget%20rose%20from%20%24250%2C000%20to%20%241%2C488%2C423 207]. "When the budget rose from $250,000 to $1,488,423 he even mortgaged his own home and automobile. Disney had bet more than his company on the success of ''Snow White''."
::p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA237&q=%22%248%20million%20in%20worldwide%20rentals%22%20george%20lucas%20blockbusting 237]. "By the end of 1938, it had grossed more than $8 million in worldwide rentals and was ranked at the time as the second-highest-grossing film after the 1925 epic ''Ben-Hur''".
::p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA255&q=%22foreign%20rentals%22 255]. "On its initial release ''Pinocchio'' brought in only $1.6 million in domestic rentals (compared with ''Snow White''{{'}}s $4.2 million) and $1.9 million in foreign rentals (compared with ''Snow White''{{'}}s $4.3 million)."
</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1938 dalam film|1938]]
|''[[You Can't Take It With You (film)|You Can't Take It With You]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">1938
* ''You Can't Take It With You'':{{cite web |title=You Can't Take It With You Premieres |publisher=[[Focus Features]] |url=http://focusfeatures.com/flashback?article_url=you_can_t_take_it_with_you_premieres |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/6AeWlL1hk?url=http://focusfeatures.com/flashback?article_url=you_can_t_take_it_with_you_premieres |archivedate=September 13, 2012|quote=''You Can't Take It With You'' received excellent reviews, won Best Picture and Best Director at the 1938 Academy Awards, and earned over $5 million worldwide.}}{{cbignore}}
* ''Boys Town'': {{citation |last=Block |first=Alex Ben |title=Boys Town |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA215 215] |quote=The film quickly became a smash nationwide, making a profit of over $2 million on worldwide rentals of $4 million.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.
* ''The Adventures of Robin Hood'': {{cite journal |last=Glancy |first=H. Mark |title=Warner Bros Film Grosses, 1921–51: the William Schaefer ledger |year=1995 |journal=Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television |volume=1 |issue=15 |pages=55–60 |doi=10.1080/01439689500260031 |quote=$3.981 million.}}
* ''Alexander's Ragtime Band'': {{citation |last=Block |first=Hayley Taylor |title=Alexander's Ragtime Band |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA213&q=%22worldwide%20rentals%22 213] |quote=Once the confusion cleared, however, the film blossomed into a commercial success, with a profit of $978,000 on worldwide rentals of $3.6 million.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#">{{cite magazine |last=Chartier |first=Roy |title=You Can't Take It With You |date=September 6, 1938 |magazine=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]] |url=http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117796537 |accessdate=September 13, 2011}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1939 dalam film|1939]]
|''[[Gone with the Wind (film)|Gone with the Wind]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|390525192}}–{{nts|402352579}} <br> ({{nts|prefix=$|32000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |GWTW|GW}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3900000}}–{{nts|4250000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Gone with the Wind |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1939/0GWTW.php |accessdate=February 8, 2013}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/4094/gone-with-the-wind |title=Gone with the Wind |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="gwtw tcm"/><ref group="#">{{Mojo title|id=gonewiththewind|title=Gone with the Wind}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA283 283]}} ."The final negative cost of ''Gone with the Wind'' (''GWTW'') has been variously reported between $3.9 million and $4.25 million."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1940 dalam film|1940]]
|''[[Pinocchio (film 1940)|Pinocchio]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|87000862}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:1600000+1900000}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2600000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Pinocchio (1940) |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/7922/pinocchio-1940 |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Snow White & Pinocchio" /><ref group="#" name="Barrier602">{{cite book |last=Barrier |first=Michael |year=2003 |title=Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |location=New York |isbn=9780199839223 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=xt5k08yuAXIC&q=pinocchio%20%22negative%20cost%20was%20%242.6%20million%22 266] |quote=The film's negative cost was $2.6 million, more than $1 million higher than ''Snow White''{{'}}s.}}</ref>
|-
|''[[Boom Town (film)|Boom Town]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4600000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2100000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Schatz (1999)">{{cite book |last=Schatz |first=Thomas |title=Boom and Bust: American Cinema in the 1940s |volume=Volume 6 of History of the American Cinema |year=1999 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |origyear=1st. pub. 1997 |isbn=9780520221307 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dwf5SUcfousC&pg=PA466 466] |quote=''Boom Town'' ($4.6 million).}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA258 258]–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA259&q=boom%20town%20biggest%20moneymaker 259]}}. "Production Cost: $2.1 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) ... ''Boom Town'' was the biggest moneymaker of 1940 and one of the top films of the decade."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1941 dalam film|1941]]
|''[[Sergeant York (film)|Sergeant York]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7800000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1600000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA267&q=sergeant%20york%20worldwide 267]}}. "With worldwide rentals of $7.8 million in its initial release, the movie made a net profit of over $3 million."</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA301 301]}}. "The studio did particularly well with its war-related pictures, such as ''Sergeant York'' (1941), which cost $1.6 million but was the studio's biggest hit of the decade aside from ''This is the Army'' (1943), the Irving Berlin musical for which the profits were donated to the Army Emergency Relief fund."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1942 dalam film|1942]]
|''[[Bambi]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|267997843}} ({{nts|prefix=$|3449353}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1700000}}–{{nts|2000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Bambi |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/810/bambi |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA281&q=%22worldwide+rentals%22 281]}}. "Worldwide rentals of $3,449,353 barely recouped the film's nearly $2 million production cost."</ref><ref group="#" name="Disney">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA712#v=twopage 712–713]}}.
* ''Bambi'': "Worldwide Box Office: $266.8; Production Cost: $1.7 (Millions of $s)"
* ''101 Dalmatians'': "Worldwide Box Office: $215.0; Production Cost: $3.6 (Millions of $s)"
* ''The Jungle Book'': "Worldwide Box Office: $170.8"; Production Cost: $3.9 (Millions of $s)"
* ''Aladdin'': "Worldwide Box Office: $505.1"; Production Cost: $28.0 (Millions of $s)"</ref>
|-
|''[[Mrs. Miniver]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8878000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1344000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Glancy |first=Mark |title=When Hollywood Loved Britain: The Hollywood 'British' Film 1939–1945 |year=1999 |publisher=[[Manchester University Press]] |isbn=9780719048531 |pages=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=T_Yryky_eA4C&pg=PA94 94]–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=T_Yryky_eA4C&pg=PA95 95] |quote=''Mrs Miniver'' was a phenomenon. It was the most popular film of the year (from any studio) in both North America and Britain, and its foreign earnings were three times higher than those of any other MGM film released in the 1941–42 season. The production cost ($1,344,000) was one of the highest of the season, indicating the studio never thought of the film as a potential loss-maker. When the film earned a worldwide gross of $8,878,000, MGM had the highest profit ($4,831,000) in its history. ''Random Harvest'' nearly matched the success of ''Mrs Miniver'' with worldwide earnings of $8,147,000 yielding the second-highest profit in MGM's history ($4,384,000). ''Random Harvest'' was also the most popular film of the year in Britain, where it proved to be even more popular than Britain's most acclaimed war film, ''In Which We Serve''.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}
* ''Mrs. Miniver'': {{citation |last=Burns |first=Douglas |title=Mrs. Miniver |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA279 279] |quote=''Mrs. Miniver'''s galvanizing effect on Americans spawned a record-breaking ten-week run at Radio City Music Hall and garnered a $5.4 million take in domestic rentals (making ''Mrs. Miniver'' 1942's top grosser), with a $4.8 million profit on worldwide rentals of $8.9 million.}}
* ''Yankee Doodle Dandy'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA275&q=%22worldwide+rentals%22 275]. "It became the second biggest box-office hit of 1942 (after Mrs. Miniver) and was praised by critics, making a profit of $3.4 million on worldwide rentals of $6.5 million."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1943 dalam film|1943]]
|''[[For Whom the Bell Tolls (film)|For Whom the Bell Tolls]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|11000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2681298}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{citation |last=McAdams |first=Frank |title=For Whom the Bell Tolls |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA287 287] |quote=Despite the early furor over the novel being “pro-red and immoral,” the film opened to strong and favorable reviews and brought in $11 million in worldwide rentals in its initial release.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=For Whom the Bell Tolls (1943) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/75353/For-Whom-the-Bell-Tolls/notes.html |accessdate=June 24, 2012}}</ref><ref group="#" name="guy-named-joe">{{cite web |title=A Guy Named Joe (1944) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/191/A-Guy-Named-Joe/notes.html |accessdate=August 29, 2012 |quote=According to M-G-M studio records at the AMPAS Library, the film had a negative cost of $2,627,000 and took in $5,363,000 at the box office. When the picture was re-issued for the 1955–56 season, it took in an additional $150,000.}}</ref>
|-
|''[[This Is the Army]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9555586.44}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1400000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite journal |last=Bergreen |first=Laurence |title=Irving Berlin: This Is the Army |date=Summer 1996 |volume=28 |issue=2 |journal=[[Prologue (majalah)|Prologue]] |url=https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1996/summer/irving-berlin-1.html |accessdate=August 22, 2012 |at=[https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1996/summer/irving-berlin-3.html Part 3]}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=This Is the Army (1943) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/92968/This-Is-the-Army/notes.html |accessdate=July 9, 2011}}</ref><ref group="#" name="guy-named-joe" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1944 dalam film|1944]]
|''[[Going My Way]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Finler356" /><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA420&q=%22going%20my%20way%22 420]}}. "(Unadjusted $s) in Millions of $s – Production Cost: $1.0"</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson232" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1945 dalam film|1945]]
|''[[Mom and Dad]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|80000000}}{{ref |Mom and Dad|MD}}/{{nts|prefix=$|22000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|65000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Schaefer (1999)">{{cite book |last=Schaefer |first=Eric |title="Bold! Daring! Shocking! True!": A History of Exploitation Films, 1919–1959 |year=1999 |publisher=[[Duke University Press]] |isbn=9780822323747 |pages=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=CSBZqe0zPaMC&pg=PA197 197]–199 |quote=Leading the pack of postwar sex hygiene films was ''Mom and Dad'' (1944), which would become not only the most successful sex hygiene film in history but the biggest pre-1960 exploitation film of any kind. At the end of 1947, the ''Los Angeles Times'' reported that ''Mom and Dad'' had grossed $2 million. By 1949 ''Time'' had estimated that ''Mom and Dad'' had taken in $8 million from twenty million moviegoers. And publicity issuing from ''Mom and Dad''{{'}}s production company indicated that by the end of 1956 it had grossed over $80 million worldwide. Net rentals of around $22 million by 1956 would easily place it in the top ten films of the late 1940s and early 1950s had it appeared on conventional lists. Some estimates have placed its total gross over the years at up to $100 million, and it was still playing drive-in dates into 1975...The film was made for around $65,000 with a crew of Hollywood veterans including director William "One Shot" Beaudine, cinematographer Marcel LePicard, and a cast that sported old stalwarts Hardie Albright, Francis Ford, and John Hamilton.}}</ref>
|-
|''[[The Bells of St. Mary's]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|11200000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1600000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}
* p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA296 296]. "Production Cost: $1.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)"
* {{citation |last=Wasson |first=Sam |title=The Bells of St. Mary's |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA297 297] |quote=This was that rare sequel that did even better at the box office than the original, bringing in a $3.7 million profit on $11.2 million in worldwide rentals.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1946 dalam film|1946]]
|''[[Song of the South]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|65000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|3300000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2125000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Song of the South |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1946/0SOTS.php |accessdate=July 10, 2011}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Gabler |first=Neal |title=Walt Disney: the biography |year=2007 |publisher=[[Aurum Press]] |pages=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EX0WAQAAIAAJ&dq=%22song+of+the+south%22+%22million%22 438] |quote=Still, the film wound up grossing $3.3 million...}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Song of the South (1946) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/90871/Song-of-the-South/notes.html |accessdate=July 25, 2012}}</ref>
|-
|''[[The Best Years of Our Lives]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14750000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2100000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010}}
* p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA132 132]."''Best Years'' was considerably cheaper, costing only $2.1 million, and therefore vastly more profitable."
* p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA286 286] (note 6.70). "Worldwide rentals for ''The Best Years of Our Lives'' amounted to $14,750,000."</ref><ref group="#">{{citation |last=Burns |first=Douglas |title=The Best years of Our Lives |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA301 301] |quote=The film made a $5 million profit on worldwide rentals of $14.8 million.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref>
|-
|''[[Duel in the Sun (film)|Duel in the Sun]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5255000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Finler356" /><ref group="#" name="HallNeale285" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1947 dalam film|1947]]
|''[[Forever Amber (film)|Forever Amber]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6375000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Solomon (1988)">{{cite book|title=Twentieth Century-Fox: a corporate and financial history|last=Solomon|first=Aubrey|publisher=[[Rowman & Littlefield]]|year=2002|isbn=9780810842441|series=Filmmakers series|volume=20|origyear=First published 1988}}<!--If page links die, try [https://books.google.com/books?id=w70iAAAAMAAJ&q=%22on+the+surface%22+%22world+rentals%22+%248]-->
* ''Sunny Side Up'': p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=WIZwZOz8LHsC&pg=PA10 10]. "''Sunny Side Up'', a musical starring Janet Gaynor and Charles Farrell, showed domestic rentals of $3.5 million, a record for the company."
* ''Forever Amber'': p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=WIZwZOz8LHsC&q=%22on+the+surface%22+%22world+rentals%22+%248 66]. "On the surface, with world rentals of $8 million, ''Forever Amber'' was considered a hit at distribution level."
* ''The French Connection''
:: p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=WIZwZOz8LHsC&pg=PA167 167]. "The ''Planet of the Apes'' motion pictures were all moneymakers and Zanuck's record would have immediately improved had he stayed through the release of ''The French Connection'', which took in rentals of approximately $75 million worldwide."
:: p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=w70iAAAAMAAJ&q=%22french+connection%22#search_anchor 256]. "$3,300,00".
</ref><ref group="#" name="HallNeale285">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA285 285] (note 6.56)}}. "The cost of ''Duel in the Sun'' has been reported as both $5,255,000 (Haver, ''David O'Selznick's Hollywood'', 361) and $6,480,000 (Thomson, ''Showman: The Life of David O'Selznick'', 472); the latter figure may include distribution expenses. ''Forever Amber'' cost $6,375,000 (Solomon, ''Twentieth Century-Fox: A Corporate and Financial History'', 243)."</ref>
|-
|''[[Unconquered]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7500000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Unconquered|UN}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Chopra-Gant |first=Mike |title=Hollywood Genres and Post-war America: Masculinity, Family and Nation in Popular Movies and Film Noir |year=2006 |publisher=[[I.B. Tauris]] |isbn=9781850438151 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=RVdCSSVd_KQC&pg=PA18 18] |quote=''Forever Amber'': $8 million; ''Unconquered'': $7.5 million; ''Life with Father'': $6.25 million}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Unconquered (1947) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/4415/Unconquered/notes.html |accessdate=January 10, 2012}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1948 dalam film|1948]]
|''[[Easter Parade (film)|Easter Parade]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:4144000+1774134}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2500000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="BlockWilson232">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA232 232]}}.
* ''Mrs. Miniver'': "Domestic Rentals: $5,358,000; Foreign Rentals: $3,520,000 (Unadjusted $s)"
* ''Meet Me in St. Louis'': "Domestic Rentals: $5,016,000; Foreign Rentals: $1,623,630 (Unadjusted $s)"
* ''Easter Parade'': "Domestic Rentals: $4,144,000; Foreign Rentals: $1,774,134 (Unadjusted $s)"</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |last=Miller |first=Frank |title=Easter Parade (1948) – Articles |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/2332/Easter-Parade/articles.html |accessdate=July 19, 2012}}</ref>
|-
|''[[The Red Shoes (film 1948)|The Red Shoes]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{ntsh|2000000}}{{nts|prefix=£|505581}} ({{nts|prefix=~$|2000000}})
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Finler356" /><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Street |first=Sarah |title=Transatlantic Crossings: British Feature Films in the United States |publisher=[[Continuum International Publishing Group]] |year=2002 |isbn=9780826413956 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Y5cn_OiCJRkC&pg=PA110 110] |quote=Although both films had higher than average budgets (''The Red Shoes'' cost £505,581 and ''Hamlet'' cost £572,530, while the average cost of the other thirty films for which Rank supplied information was £233,000), they resulted in high takings at home and abroad.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |first=Lawrence H. |last=Officer |title=Dollar-Pound Exchange Rate From 1791 |publisher=MeasuringWorth |year=2011 |url=http://www.measuringworth.com/datasets/exchangepound/result.php?year_source=1791&year_result=2011 |accessdate=November 18, 2012 |quote=1947–1948: $4.03 (per British pound)}}</ref>
|-
|''[[The Snake Pit]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4100000}}{{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=The Snake Pit |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1948/0SNPI.php |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20111228005949/http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1948/0SNPI.php |archivedate=December 28, 2011}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite news |title='Snake Pit' Seen No Problem After All |date=January 19, 1949 |work=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]] |page=[https://archive.org/stream/variety173-1949-01#page/n348/mode/1up 7]}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1949 dalam film|1949]]
|''[[Samson and Delilah (film 1949)|Samson and Delilah]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:7976730+6232520}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3097563}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale136" /><ref group="#" name="Birchard (2009)" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1950 dalam film|1950]]
|''[[Cinderella (film 1950)|Cinderella]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|263591415}}<br />({{nts|prefix=$|20000000}}/{{nts|prefix=$|7800000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Cinderella (1950) |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Cinderella-(1950) |accessdate=January 2, 2017}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |first1=Michael D. |last1=Eisner |first2=Tony |last2=Schwartz |title=Work in Progress |publisher=[[Pennsylvania State University]] |year=2009 |isbn=9780786885077 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=73_WAAAAMAAJ&q=cinderella+%22Released+in+February+1950,+it+cost+nearly+%243+million+to+make+but+earned+more+than+%2420+million+worldwide%22 178] |quote=''Cinderella'' revived its fortunes. Re-released in February 1950, it cost nearly $3 million to make but earned more than $20 million worldwide.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Barrier |first=Michael |title=Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in Its Golden Age |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2003 |isbn=9780195167290 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zDJXnzMh7bkC&pg=PA401#v=snippet&q=%242.2%20million%20cinderella%20gross%20rentals%20disney%20and%20rko%20%247.8%20million 401] |quote=It cost around $2.2 million, little more than each of the two package features, Melody Time and The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad (as Tluo Fabulous Characters had ultimately been named), that just preceded it, but its gross rentals—an amount shared by Disney and RKO—were $7.8 million, almost twice as much as the two package features combined.}}</ref>
|-
|''[[King Solomon's Mines (film 1950)|King Solomon's Mines]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10050000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2258000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Mannix">{{cite book |title=The E. J. Mannix ledger |year=1962 |publisher=Howard Strickling Collection |location=Margaret Herrick Library, [[Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences]]}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1951 dalam film|1951]]
|''[[Quo Vadis (film 1951)|Quo Vadis]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|21037000}}–{{nts|26700000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7623000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale136">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA136 136]–139}}
* ''Samson and Delilah'': "...the film became the highest grosser in the studio's history to date, with domestic rentals of $7,976,730 by 1955 and a further $6,232,520 overseas...For all their spectacle, ''Samson'' and ''David'' were quite economically produced, costing $3,097,563 and $2,170,000 respectively."
* ''Quo Vadis'': "Production costs totaled a record $7,623,000...Worldwide rentals totaled $21,037,000, almost half of which came from the foreign market."</ref><ref group="#" name="Lev" /><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson335">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA335 335]}}.
* ''The Robe'': "Domestic Rentals: $16.7; Foreign Rentals: $9.4; Production Cost: $4.1 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''Quo Vadis'': "Domestic Rentals: $11.1; Foreign Rentals: $15.6; Production Cost: $7.5 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1952 dalam film|1952]]
|''[[This Is Cinerama]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}{{ref |Cinerama|CI}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite news |last=Mulligan |first=Hugh A. |newspaper=[[The Register-Guard]] |location=Eugene, Oregon |title=Cinerama Pushing Ahead As Biggest Money-Maker |date=September 23, 1956 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GPRVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=YeIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6899,3861317 7B] }}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Zone |first=Ray |title=3-D Revolution: The History of Modern Stereoscopic Cinema |publisher=[[University Press of Kentucky]] |year=2012 |isbn=9780813136110 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=k2Ajw-EEOEkC&pg=PA71 71] |quote=Produced at a cost of $1 million, ''This is Cinerama'' ran 122 weeks, earning $4.7 million in its initial New York run alone and eventually grossed over $32 million. It was obvious to Hollywood that the public was ready for a new form of motion picture entertainment. The first five Cinerama feature-length travelogues, though they only played in twenty-two theaters, pulled in a combined gross of $82 million.}}</ref>
|-
|''[[The Greatest Show on Earth (film)|The Greatest Show on Earth]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18350000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} {{ref |Greatest Show|GS}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3873946}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{citation |last=Burns |first=Douglas |year=2010 |title=The Greatest Show on Earth |pages=354–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA355 355] |quote=By May 1953, ''Variety'' was reporting that the Best Picture winner had amassed $18.35 million in worldwide rentals.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=The Greatest Show on Earth (1952) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/4608/The-Greatest-Show-on-Earth/notes.html |accessdate=January 8, 2012}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Birchard (2009)">{{Cite book |last=Birchard |first=Robert S. |title=Cecil B. DeMille's Hollywood |year=2009 |publisher=[[University Press of Kentucky]] |isbn=9780813138299}}
* ch. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=h8I1dEf7GqIC&pg=PT104 45. The Ten Commandments] (1923). "Cost: $1,475,836.93; Gross: $4,169,798.38"
* ch. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=h8I1dEf7GqIC&pg=PT138 56. The Sign of the Cross]. "Cost: $694,064.67; Gross: $2,738,993.35 (to 1937)"
* ch. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=h8I1dEf7GqIC&pg=PT177 68. Samson and Delilah]. "Cost: $3,097,563.05"
* ch. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=h8I1dEf7GqIC&pg=PT181 69. The Greatest Show on Earth]. "Cost: $3,873,946.50; Gross receipts: $15,797,396.36 (to December 29, 1962)"
* ch. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=h8I1dEf7GqIC&pg=PT185 70. The Ten Commandments] (1956). "Cost: $13,272,381.87; Gross receipts: $90,066,230.00 (to June 23, 1979)"
</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1953 dalam film|1953]]
|''[[Peter Pan (film 1953)|Peter Pan]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|145000000}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}–{{nts|4000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Peter Pan (1953) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/86554/Peter-Pan/notes.html |accessdate=July 24, 2011}}</ref>
|-
|''[[The Robe (film)|The Robe]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|25000000}}–{{nts|{{#expr:16700000+9400000}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4100000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale147">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA147 147]–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA148 148]}}. "To take full advantage of CinemaScope's panoramic possibilities, shooting was delayed for the sets to be redesigned and rebuilt, adding $500,000 to the eventual $4.1 million budget...It ultimately returned domestic rentals of $17.5 million and $25 million worldwide, placing it second only to ''Gone with the Wind'' in ''Variety''{{'}}s annually updated chart."</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA367&q=%22foreign%20rentals%22 367]}}. "It brought in $16.7 million in domestic rentals, $9.4 million in foreign rentals, and made a net profit of $8.1 million."</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson335" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1954 dalam film|1954]]
|''[[Rear Window]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|24500000}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|5300000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/8393/rear-window |title=Rear Window |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Lev">{{cite book |last=Lev |first=Peter |title=Transforming the Screen, 1950–1959 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |year=2006 |volume=Volume 7 of History of the American Cinema |isbn=9780520249660}}
* ''Quo Vadis'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TEGl2Ele_XoC&pg=PA15 15]. "MGM's most expensive film of the period, ''Quo Vadis'' (1951) also did extremely well. The cost was $7,623,000, earnings were an estimated $21.2 million (with foreign earnings almost 50 percent of this total), and profit was estimated at $5,562,000."
* ''Rear Window'': pp. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TEGl2Ele_XoC&pg=PA203 203]–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TEGl2Ele_XoC&pg=PA204 204]. "Rear Window (1954) was an excellent commercial success, with a cost of $1 million and North American rentals of $5.3 million."</ref>
|-
|''[[White Christmas (film)|White Christmas]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|26000050}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|12000000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=White Christmas |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/11167/white-christmas |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA420 420]}}. "Domestic Box Office: $19.6 million; Production Cost: $3.8 million."</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA149 149]}}. "VistaVision was first used for the musical ''White Christmas'' (1954), which ''Variety'' named the top grosser of its year with anticipated domestic rentals of $12 million."</ref>
|-
|''[[20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (film 1954)|20,000 Leagues Under the Sea]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|25000134}}{{ref |USgross|*}}<br />({{nts|prefix=$|6800000}}–{{nts|8000000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4500000}}–{{nts|9000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=20000 Leagues Under The Sea |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/14246/20000-leagues-under-the-sea |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |last=Miller |first=John M |title=20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954) – Articles |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/20642/20-000-Leagues-Under-the-Sea/articles.html |accessdate=January 9, 2012}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler356" /><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA320 320]}}. "It was up and running in time to handle Disney's most elaborate expensive feature, ''20,000 Leagues Under the Sea'', based on the book by Jules Verne, starring James Mason and Kirk Douglas and directed by Richard Fleischer at a cost of $4.5 million."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1955 dalam film|1955]]
|''[[Lady and the Tramp]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|187000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|6500000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="DisneyWWVariety2003">{{cite news|first=Anthony |last=D'Alessandro |title=Disney Animated Features at the Worldwide Box Office |date=October 27, 2003 |work=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]] |quote=The Jungle Book $378 million; Lady and the Tramp $187 million}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler356" /><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Lady and the Tramp (1955) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/80607/Lady-and-the-Tramp/notes.html |accessdate=July 27, 2011}}</ref>
|-
|''[[Cinerama Holiday]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|21000000}}{{ref |Cinerama|CI}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite news |last=Minego |first=Pete |work=[[Portsmouth Daily Times]] |location=Portsmouth, Ohio |title=Pete's Pungent Patter |date=May 21, 1956 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=I7dQAAAAIBAJ&sjid=6M8MAAAAIBAJ&pg=4059,7032150&dq=cinerama-holiday+million 19]}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Cinerama Holiday (1955) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/493857/Cinerama-Holiday/notes.html |accessdate=July 7, 2012}}</ref>
|-
|''[[Mister Roberts (film 1955)|Mister Roberts]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9900000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2400000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}
* p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA382 382]. "Production Cost: $2.4 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)"
* {{citation |last=Burns |first=Douglas |title=Mister Roberts |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA383#v=onepage&q=%22%249.9%20million%22 383] |quote=''Mister Roberts'' sailed onto movie screens buoyed by enthusiastic reviews and receptive audiences. For pr, Fonda, Cagney, and lemmon reenacted several scenes on ed sullivan's popular ''Toast of the Town'' television variety show. It returned a net profit of $4.5 million on worldwide rentals of $9.9 million, putting it in the top 5 domestic films of 1955.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1956 dalam film|1956]]
|''[[The Ten Commandments (film 1956)|The Ten Commandments]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|90066230}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}<br />({{nts|prefix=$|122700000}}/{{nts|prefix=$|55200000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|13270000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Birchard (2009)" /><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson327">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA327 327]}}. "Production cost: $13.3 million; Domestic Film Rental: $31.3; Foreign Film Rental: $23.9; Worldwide Box office (estimated): $122.7 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref><ref group="#" name="HallNeale159">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA159 159]–161}}
* ''The Ten Commandments'': "No film did more to entrench roadshow policy than ''The Ten Commandments''. While the success of ''This Is Cinerama'', ''The Robe'', and even ''Eighty Days'' could be attributed, at least in part, to their respective photographic and projection formats, that of DeMille's film (which cost a record $13,266,491) could not...General release began at normal prices in 1959 and continued until the end of the following year, when the film was temporarily withdrawn (the first of several reissues came in 1966). The worldwide rental by this time was around $60 million. In the domestic market it dislodged ''Gone with the Wind'' from the number one position on Variety's list of All-Time Rentals Champs. ''GWTW'' had hitherto maintained its lead through several reissues (and was soon to regain it through another in 1961)."
* ''The Bridge on the River Kwai'': Columbia's Anglo-American war film ''The Bridge on the River Kwai'' (1957) opened on a roadshow basis in selected U.S. cities (including New York, Chicago, Boston, and Los Angeles) and in London. Costing only $2,840,000 to produce, it grossed $30.6 million worldwide on first release."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1957 dalam film|1957]]
|''[[The Bridge on the River Kwai]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30600000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2840000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale159" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1958 dalam film|1958]]
|''[[South Pacific (film 1958)|South Pacific]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5610000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA153 153]}}. "''South Pacific'' also became for a time the most successful film ever released in the United Kingdom, where it earned a box-office gross three times its negative cost of $5,610,000. Anticipated global rentals after three years were $30 million."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1959 dalam film|1959]]
|''[[Ben-Hur (film 1959)|Ben-Hur]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|90000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}<br />({{nts|prefix=$|146900000}}/{{nts|prefix=$|66100000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|15900000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{Cite book |last=Ross |first=Steven J. |year=2011 |title=Hollywood Left and Right: How Movie Stars Shaped American Politics |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |isbn=9780199911431 |pages=[https://books.google.com/books?id=pn1CuZUHk9MC&pg=PA278#v=twopage 278–279] |quote=Costing $15 million to produce, the film earned $47 million by the end of 1961 and $90 million worldwide by January 1989.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA324 324]}}. "Worldwide box office: $146.9 million; Worldwide rentals: $66.1 million; Production cost: $15.9 million. (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)"</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1960 dalam film|1960]]
|''[[Swiss Family Robinson (film 1960)|Swiss Family Robinson]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|4000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Reid |first=John Howard |title=America's Best, Britain's Finest: A Survey of Mixed Movies |volume=Volume 14 of Hollywood classics |publisher=[[Lulu (company)|Lulu]] |year=2006 |isbn=9781411678774 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=zCm5aNkafSYC&pg=PA243 243]–245 |quote=Negative cost: around $4 million; Worldwide film rentals gross (including 1968 American reissue) to 1970: $30 million.}}</ref>
|-
|''[[Spartacus (film)|Spartacus]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|60000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:12462044+9643181}}}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10284014}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{Cite book |last=Webster |first=Patrick |year=2010 |title=Love and Death in Kubrick: A Critical Study of the Films from Lolita Through Eyes Wide Shut |publisher=[[McFarland & Company]] |isbn=9780786459162 |pages=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Bz_x37RSSqIC&pg=PA298 298] (note 2.23) |quote=''Spartacus'' cost $12 million and grossed some $60 million at the box office, figures Kubrick rarely again matched.}}</ref><ref group="#" name="HallNeale179">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA179 179]}}.
* ''Spartacus'': "In the case of ''Spartacus'', overseas earnings to 1969 amounted to $12,462,044, while U.S. and Canadian rentals (even including a million-dollar TV sale) were only $10,643,181. But the film failed to show a profit on production costs of $10,284,014 because of the distribution charges and expenses amounting to an additional $15,308,083."
* ''The Bible'': "''The Bible—In the Beginning...'' (1966) was financed by the Italian producer Dino De Laurentiis from private investors and Swiss banks. He then sold distribution rights outside Italy jointly to Fox and Seven Arts for $15 million (70 percent of which came from Fox), thereby recouping the bulk of his $18 million investment. Although ''The Bible'' returned a respectable world rental of $25.3 million, Fox was still left with a net loss of just over $1.5 million. It was the last biblical epic to be released by any major Hollywood studio for nearly twenty years."</ref>
|-
|''[[Psycho (film 1960)|Psycho]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}+ ({{nts|prefix=$|14000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |last=Nixon |first=Rob |title=Psycho (1960) – Articles |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/24944/Psycho/articles.html |accessdate=January 9, 2012}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1961 dalam film|1961]]
|''[[One Hundred and One Dalmatians]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|215880212}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3600000}}–{{nts|4000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/11/101-dalmatians-1961 |title=101 Dalmatians (1961) |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=One Hundred and One Dalmatians |website=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]] |date=December 31, 1960 |url=http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117793715 |accessdate=August 23, 2011}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Disney" />
|-
|''[[West Side Story (film 1961)|West Side Story]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|105000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|31800000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{citation |last=Block |first=Hayley Taylor |title=West Side Story |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA449 449] |quote=With its three rereleases, it took in over $105 million in worldwide box office ($720 million in 2005 dollars).}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson434" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1962 dalam film|1962]]
|''[[Lawrence of Arabia (film)|Lawrence of Arabia]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:44824852+32500000}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|69995385}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|13800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''Lawrence of Arabia''
* 1962 release: {{cite web |title=Lawrence of Arabia |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1962/0LWRN.php |accessdate=August 15, 2011 |quote=Worldwide Box Office: $69,995,385; International Box Office: $32,500,000}}
* US total (including reissues): {{cite web |title=Lawrence of Arabia |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/5851/lawrence-of-arabia |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=$44,824,852}}</ref><ref group="#" name="HallNeale165">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA165 165]–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA166 166]}}
* ''Lawrence of Arabia'': Columbia released the $13.8 million ''Lawrence of Arabia'' (1962), filmed in Super Panavision 70, exclusively on a hard-ticket basis, but opened ''Barabbas'' (1962), ''The Cardinal'' (1963), and the $12 million Joseph Conrad adaptation ''Lord Jim'' (1965) as 70mm roadshows in selected territories only."
* ''The Longest Day'': "Darryl's most ambitious independent production was ''The Longest Day'' (1962), a three-hour reconstruction of D-Day filmed in black-and-white CinemaScope at a cost of $8 million. It grossed over $30 million worldwide as a roadshow followed by general release, thereby helping the studio regain stability during its period of reorganization."
* ''Cleopatra'': "With top tickets set at an all-time high of $5.50,''Cleopatra'' had amassed as much as $20 million in such guarantees from exhibitors even before its premiere. Fox claimed the film had cost in total $44 million, of which $31,115,000 represented the direct negative cost and the rest distribution, print and advertising expenses. (These figures excluded the more than $5 million spent on the production's abortive British shoot in 1960–61, prior to its relocation to Italy.) By 1966 worldwide rentals had reached $38,042,000 including $23.5 million from the United States."</ref>
|-
|''[[How the West Was Won (film)|How the West Was Won]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|35000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14483000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale164">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA164 164]}}. "''West'' cost $14,483,000; although it earned $35 million worldwide in just under three years, with ultimate domestic rentals totaling $20,932,883, high distribution costs severely limited its profitability."</ref>
|-
|''[[The Longest Day (film)|The Longest Day]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|33200000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8600000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="BlockWilson434" /><ref group="#" name="HallNeale165" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1963 dalam film|1963]]
|''[[Cleopatra (film 1963)|Cleopatra]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|40300000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|31115000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="BlockWilson434" /><ref group="#" name="HallNeale165" />
|-
|''[[From Russia with Love (film)|From Russia with Love]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|78900000}}/{{nts|prefix=$|29400000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}<br />({{nts|prefix=$|12500000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Bond grosses" /><ref group="#" name="Chapman (2007)">{{cite book |last=Chapman |first=James |title=Licence to thrill: a cultural history of the James Bond films |url=https://archive.org/details/licencetothrillc0000chap |publisher=[[I.B. Tauris]] |year=2007 |isbn=978-1-84511-515-9 |ref=harv}}
* ''From Russia With Love'': "The American release of ''From Russia With Love'' again followed on some six months after it had been shown in Britain. North American rentals of $9.9 million were an improvement on its predecessor, helped by a slightly wider release, though they were still only half the $19.5 million of foreign rentals... ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=E8wqAQAAIAAJ&q=%22the+american+release+of+from+russia+with+love%22 Online copy] at [[Google Books]])"
* ''Diamonds Are Forever'': "''Diamonds Are Forever'' marked a return to the box-office heights of the Bond films of the mid-1960s. Its worldwide rentals were $45.7 million..."{{page needed|date=November 2018}}
* ''Moonraker'': "These figures were surpassed by ''Moonraker'', which earned total worldwide rentals of $87.7 million, of which $33 million came from North America. ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=E8wqAQAAIAAJ&q=$87.7+million Online copy] at [[Google Books]])"</ref><ref group="#" name="Balio (2009)">{{cite book |last=Balio |first=Tino |year=2009 |title=United Artists, Volume 2, 1951–1978: the Company that Changed the Film Industry |url=https://archive.org/details/unitedartistscom00bali_593 |publisher=[[University of Wisconsin Press]] |isbn=978-0-299-23014-2 |ref=harv |page=[https://archive.org/details/unitedartistscom00bali_593/page/261 261]}}
* ''From Russia With Love'': "The picture grossed twice as much as ''Dr. No'', both domestic and foreign—$12.5 million worldwide ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KKoLAQAAMAAJ&q=%22%2412.5+million+worldwide%22 Online copy] at [[Google Books]])"
* ''Goldfinger'': "Produced on a budget of around $3 million, ''Goldfinger'' grossed a phenomenal $46 million worldwide the first time around. ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KKoLAQAAMAAJ&q=Goldfinger+%22$46+million+worldwide%22 Online copy] at [[Google Books]])"</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1964 dalam film|1964]]
|''[[My Fair Lady (film)|My Fair Lady]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|55000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|17000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale184">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA184 184]}}
* ''My Fair Lady'': "''My Fair Lady'' (1964) cost Warners $17 million to make, including a record $5.5 million just for the film rights to the Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe stage show and a million-dollar fee for star Audrey Hepburn. By 1967 it was reported to have grossed $55 million from roadshowing worldwide."
* ''Mary Poppins'': "''Mary Poppins'' (1964), which cost $5.2 million, was neither a stage adaptation nor a roadshow. But by the end of its first release, it had grossed nearly $50 million worldwide."</ref>
|-
|''[[Goldfinger (film)|Goldfinger]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|124900000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|46000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Bond grosses" /><ref group="#" name="Balio (2009)" />
|-
|''[[Mary Poppins (film)|Mary Poppins]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|44000000}}–{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{citation |last=Burns |first=Douglas |title=Mary Poppins |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA469 469] |quote=In its initial run, ''Poppins'' garnered an astounding $44 million in worldwide rentals and became the company's first Best Picture Oscar contender.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#" name="HallNeale184" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1965 dalam film|1965]]
|''[[The Sound of Music (film)|The Sound of Music]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|286214076}} ({{nts|prefix=$|114600000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/9495/the-sound-of-music |title=The Sound of Music |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson434">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA434 434]}}.
* ''The Sound of Music'': "Domestic Rentals: $68.4; Foreign Rentals: $46.2; Production Cost: $8.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''The Dirty Dozen'': "Domestic Rentals: $20.1; Foreign Rentals: $11.2; Production Cost: $5.4 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''2001: A Space Odyssey'': "Domestic Rentals: $16.4; Foreign Rentals: $5.5; Production Cost: $10.3 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''Cleopatra'': "Domestic Rentals: $22.1; Foreign Rentals: $18.2; Production Cost: $44.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''West Side Story'': "Domestic Rentals: $16.2; Foreign Rentals: $15.6; Production Cost: $7.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''The Longest Day'': "Domestic Rentals: $13.9; Foreign Rentals: $19.3; Production Cost: $8.6 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid'': "Domestic Rentals: $29.2; Foreign Rentals: $7.9; Production Cost: $6.6 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1966 dalam film|1966]]
|''[[The Bible: In the Beginning]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|25300000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale179" />
|-
|''[[Hawaii (film 1966)|Hawaii]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|34562222}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|15600000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|15000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Hawaii |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1966/0HWII.php |accessdate=August 18, 2011}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler356">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA356 356]–363}}</ref>
|-
|''[[Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? (film)|Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}}{{ref |USgross|*}} ({{nts|prefix=$|14500000}}){{ref |USgross|*}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7613000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/11200/whos-afraid-of-virginia-woolf? |title=Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler356" /><ref group="#" name="HallNeale188">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA188 188]}}. "The negative cost of Warners' adaptation of Edward Albee's play ''Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?'' (1966)—filmed in widescreen and black-and-white, largely set in domestic interiors and with a cast of only four principal actors—amounted to $7,613,000, in part because stars Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton received up-front fees of $1 million and $750,000 respectively, against 10 percent of the gross apiece. (Their participation was presumably added to the budget)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1967 dalam film|1967]]
|''[[The Jungle Book (film 1967)|The Jungle Book]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|378000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|23800000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3900000}}–{{nts|4000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="DisneyWWVariety2003"/><ref group="#">{{cite news |title=Animals Portray Parts in Disney's "Robin Hood" |date=October 18, 1970 |newspaper=[[The Blade (Toledo, Ohio)|Toledo Blade]] |at=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1350&dat=19701018&id=k8hOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=xQEEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2133,463153 Sec. G, p. 7] |quote="The Jungle Book," in it's [sic] initial world-wide release, has grossed $23.8 million to date...}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite web |title=The Jungle Book |website=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]] |date=December 31, 1966 |url=https://variety.com/1966/film/reviews/the-jungle-book-1200421257/ |accessdate=March 14, 2018 |quote=It was filmed at a declared cost of $4 million over a 42-month period.}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Disney" />
|-
|''[[The Graduate]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|85000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3100000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Denisoff & Romanowski (1991)">{{cite book |first1=R. Serge |last1=Denisoff |first2=William D. |last2=Romanowski |title=Risky Business: Rock in Film |year=1991 |publisher=Transaction Publishers |isbn=9780887388439}}
* ''The Graduate'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kT0fKUCTUC4C&pg=PA167 167]. "World net rental was estimated at more than $85 million by January 1971."
* ''Grease'': p. [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kT0fKUCTUC4C&pg=PA236 236]. "The film was produced for $6 million and Paramount reportedly spent another $3 million on promotion."</ref><ref group="#" name="HallNeale191">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA191 191]–192}}
* ''The Graduate'': "''The Graduate'' eventually earned U.S. rentals of $44,090,729 on a production cost of $3.1 million to become the most lucrative non-roadshow picture (and independent release) to date."
* ''Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid'': "None of these films was roadshown in the United States; most were set in contemporary America or had a contemporary "take" on the past (the casting of genuine teenagers to play Romeo and Juliet, the urbane sophistication of the dialogue in ''Butch Cassidy'', the antiauthoritarianism of ''Bonnie and Clyde'' and ''MASH''); most were produced on modest or medium-sized budgets (as low as $450,000 for ''Easy Rider'' and no higher than $6,825,000 for ''Butch Cassidy''); and all grossed upward of $10 million domestically."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1968 dalam film|1968]]
|''[[2001: A Space Odyssey (film)|2001: A Space Odyssey]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:138000000+214618+568997+135370+1283820+192457+27510+159068+5046+155841+296525 round -6}}}}–{{nts|{{#expr:190000000+214618+568997+135370+1283820+192457+27510+159068+5046+155841+296525 round -7}}}}<br />({{nts|prefix=$|21900000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10300000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''2001: A Space Odyssey''
* Total: {{cite web |last=Miller |first=Frank |title=2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) – Articles |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.turner.com/tcmdb/title/628/2001-A-Space-Odyssey/articles.html |accessdate=August 24, 2011 |quote=2001: A Space Odyssey made $15 million on its initial U.S. release, and currently shows a worldwide gross of over $190 million. }}
* As of 2006: {{cite book |last=Palmer |first=R. Barton |chapter=2001: The Critical Reception and the Generation Gap |editor-last=Kolker |editor-first=Robert Phillip |title=Stanley Kubrick's 2001: a Space Odyssey: New Essays |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2006 |isbn=9780195174526 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=YpritcZXPFoC&pg=PA16 16] |quote=With its initial and subsequent releases, domestic and worldwide, Kubrick's arty, intellectual film earned nearly $138 million, which was, at that time, an astounding figure.}}
* 2013 re-release: {{cite web |title=2001: A Space Odyssey (2013 re-release) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=20012013.htm |accessdate=September 26, 2018 |quote=Domestic Total Gross: $214,618; United Kingdom: $568,997 }}
* 2014 re-release: {{cite web |title=2001: A Space Odyssey (2014 re-release) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=20012014.htm |accessdate=September 26, 2018 |quote=Domestic Total Gross: $135,370 |archive-date=2019-06-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190605170631/https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=20012014.htm |dead-url=yes }}
* 2018 re-release: {{cite web |title=2001: A Space Odyssey (2018 re-release) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=20012018.htm |accessdate=September 26, 2018 |quote=Domestic Total Gross: $1,283,820; Australia: $192,457; Greece: $27,510; Netherlands: $159,068; New Zealand: $5,046; Russia: $155,841; United Kingdom: $296,525 }}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson434" />
|-
|''[[Funny Girl (film)|Funny Girl]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|80000000}}–{{nts|100000000}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|8800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite news |last=Haber |first=Joyces |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |title='Funny Girl' a Box Office Winner |date=March 27, 1969 |url=https://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/672252782.html?dids=672252782:672252782&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI |accessdate=March 29, 2012 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20121105102014/http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/672252782.html?dids=672252782:672252782&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:AI |archivedate=2012-11-05 |quote=..."Funny Girl" will gross an estimated $80 to $100 million worldwide. |dead-url=yes }}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite news |last=Welles |first=Chris |title=Behind the Silence at Columbia Pictures—No Moguls, No Minions, Just Profits |work=[[New York (majalah)|New York]] |publisher=New York Media |date=September 7, 1970 |volume=3 |issue=36 |pages=42–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=8-ICAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA47 47] |quote=While Columbia, battling Ray Stark over every dollar, did ''Funny Girl'' for around $8.8 million, a million or so over budget, Fox spent nearly $24 million on ''Hello, Dolly!'', more than twice the initial budget, and the film will thus have to gross three times as much to break even.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1969 dalam film|1969]]
|''[[Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|152308525}} ({{nts|prefix=$|37100000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6600000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid''
* United States and Canada: {{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/1631/butch-cassidy-and-the-sundance-kid |title=Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=$102,308,525}}
* Outside North America: {{cite book |title=Vanity Fair |year=2008 |issue=577–578 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=VloTAQAAMAAJ&q=%22by+the+spring+of+1970+it+had+taken+in+$46+million+in+North+America+and+grossed+another+$50+million+abroad%22&dq=%22by+the+spring+of+1970+it+had+taken+in+$46+million+in+North+America+and+grossed+another+$50+million+abroad%22 388] |quote=''Butch Cassidy'' went on to be a huge hit—by the spring of 1970 it had taken in $46 million in North America and grossed another $50 million abroad.|title-link=Vanity Fair (magazine) }}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson434" /><ref group="#" name="HallNeale191" />
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1970 dalam film|1970]]
|''[[Love Story (film 1970)|Love Story]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|80000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2260000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite news |title='Love Story' II: Ryan Redux? |magazine=[[New York (majalah)|New York]] |publisher=New York Media |year=1976 |volume=9 |page= 389 |quote=Bring those handkerchiefs out of retirement. ... After all, the first movie made around $80 million worldwide.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{citation |last=Block |first=Hayley Taylor |title=Love Story |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA545 545] |quote=The final cost came in at $2,260,000.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref>
|-
|''[[Airport (film 1970)|Airport]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|75000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite news |last=Scott |first=Vernon |agency=[[United Press International]] |work=[[The Bryan Times]] |title="Airports" Flourish |date=June 30, 1979 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_L8wAAAAIBAJ&sjid=x1EDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5730,9236104 10]}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA541 541]}}. "Screenwriter and director George Seaton was given a then-whopping production budget of $10 million to make what would be his last big movie after a long career as an actor in radio, a screenwriter, and a director."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="3" | [[1971 dalam film|1971]]
|''[[The French Connection (film)|The French Connection]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|75000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|3300000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Solomon (1988)" />
|-
|''[[Fiddler on the Roof (film)|Fiddler on the Roof]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|49400000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}} <br> ({{nts|prefix=$|100000000}}/{{nts|prefix=$|45100000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA549 549]}}. "Fiddler had the highest domestic box office of 1971 (it was second in worldwide box office after ''Diamonds Are Forever''), with more than $100 million in unadjusted worldwide box office on its initial release. The soundtrack album was also a huge seller. The 1979 rerelease was not as successful, with the $3.8 million print and ad costs almost as high as the $4.3 million in worldwide rentals."</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson527" />
|-
|''[[Diamonds Are Forever (film)|Diamonds Are Forever]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|116000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|45700000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Bond grosses">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA428#v=twopage 428–429]}}
* ''From Russia With Love'': "Worldwide Box Office: 78.9; Production Cost: 2.0 (in millions of $s)"
* ''Goldfinger'': "Worldwide Box Office: 124.9; Production Cost: 3.0 (in millions of $s)"
* ''Diamonds Are Forever'': "Worldwide Box Office: 116; Production Cost: 7.2 (in millions of $s)"
* ''Moonraker'': "Worldwide Box Office: 210.3; Production Cost: 34.0 (in millions of $s)"
</ref><ref group="#" name="Chapman (2007)" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1972 dalam film|1972]]
|''[[The Godfather]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|245066044}}–{{nts|286000000}} <br> ({{nts|prefix=$|127600000}}–{{nts|142000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''The Godfather''
* 1974: {{cite book |title=Newsweek |volume=84 |issue=19–27 |year=1974 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sCXkAAAAMAAJ&q=%22%24285+million%22 74] |quote=The original ''Godfather'' has grossed a mind-boggling $285 million...|title-link=Newsweek }}
* 1991: {{cite book |last=Von Gunden |first=Kenneth |title=Postmodern auteurs: Coppola, Lucas, De Palma, Spielberg, and Scorsese |publisher=[[McFarland & Company]] |year=1991 |isbn=9780899506180 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=r91ZAAAAMAAJ&q=%22%24285+million%22 36] |quote=Since ''The Godfather'' had earned over $85 million in U.S.-Canada rentals (the worldwide box-office gross was $285 million), a sequel, according to the usual formula, could be expected to earn approximately two-thirds of the original's box-office take (ultimately ''Godfather II'' had rentals of $30 million).}}
* 1997 re-release: {{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/4049/the-godfather-1997-re-issue |title=The Godfather (Re-issue) |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=North America: $1,267,249}}
* As of 2010: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA246 246]}}. "Domestic Box Office: $135.0; Foreign Box Office: $110.1 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* Total: {{cite web |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/4048/the-godfather |title=The Godfather |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=Worldwide Gross: $245,066,044}}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson527" /><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Jacobs |first=Diane |title=Hollywood Renaissance |publisher=[[Dell Publishing]] |year=1980 |isbn=9780440533825 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KP0HAQAAMAAJ&q=%22million+in+worldwide+sales%22+godfather 115] |quote=The Godfather catapulted Coppola to overnight celebrity, earning three Academy Awards and a then record-breaking $142 million in worldwide sales.}}</ref><ref group="#" name="godfather-tcm">{{cite web |title=The Godfather (1972) – Notes |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/443184/The-Godfather/notes.html |accessdate=January 9, 2012 |archive-date=2013-10-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029203642/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/443184/The-Godfather/notes.html |dead-url=yes }}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1973 dalam film|1973]]
|''[[The Exorcist (film)|The Exorcist]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|413071948}} ({{nts|prefix=$|110000000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=The Exorcist |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/3253/the-exorcist |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |first1=Robert Henry |last1=Stanley |first2=Charles Side |last2=Steinberg |title=The media environment: mass communications in American society |publisher=Hastings House |year=1976 |isbn=9780803846814 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Z30tAAAAMAAJ&q=%22the+sting%22+million+worldwide+exorcist&dq=%22 76] |quote=...further reflected by the phenomenal successes of ''The Sting'', ''Chinatown'' and ''The Exorcist''. The latter film, which cost about $10 million to produce, has grossed over $110 million worldwide.}}</ref>
|-
|''[[The Sting]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|115000000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|5500000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{Citation |title=New York |publisher=New York Media |year=1975 |volume=8 |quote=...''Jaws'' should outstrip another MCA hit, ''The Sting'', which had world-wide revenues of $115 million. ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jW8pAQAAIAAJ&q=%22The+Sting%2C+which+had+world-wide%22+revenues Online copy] at [[Google Books]])|title-link=New York (magazine) }}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson560">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA560 560]}}. "Production Cost: $5.5 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1974 dalam film|1974]]
|''[[The Towering Inferno]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:48838000+43000000}}}}{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14300000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA354 206]–208}}. "The most successful entry in the disaster cycle was the $15 million ''The Towering Inferno'' which earned over $48,650,000 in domestic rentals and about $40 million foreign."</ref><ref group="#">{{cite news |first=Leonard |last=Klady |title=All-Time Top Film Rentals |date=1998 |work=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]] |url=http://www.variety.com:80/numbers/video.asp |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/19991007042514/http://www.variety.com/numbers/video.asp |archivedate=October 7, 1999 |quote=Domestic rentals: $48,838,000 }}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite magazine |magazine=[[The Hollywood Reporter]] |title=<!--INVISIBLE CHARACTER--> <!-- Please do not remove the invisible character or replace it with the "blank space" code. The article does not have a title, and removing the invisible character will trigger empty quotation marks in the citation template. --> |date=January 27, 1976 |quote=Foreign rentals: $43 million}}{{cbignore}}{{bots|deny=Josvebot}}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson568">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=568}}. "Production Cost: $14.3 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
|''[[Blazing Saddles]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|80000000}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|2600000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Brooks |first=Mel |chapter=My Movies: The Collisions of Art and Money |title=The movie business book |url=https://archive.org/details/moviebusinessboo03edunse |editor-first=Jason E |editor-last=Squire |publisher=[[Simon & Schuster]] |edition=3 |year=2004 |isbn=978-0-7432-1937-2 |quote=To their credit, ''Blazing saddles'', opened wide in June to tremendous business around the country. It's done over $80 million in rentals worldwide in 1974 dollars. ([https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=f_ZlSCBuRO4C&pg=PT49 Online copy] at [[Google Books]])}}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson564">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA564 564]}}. "Production Cost: $2.6 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1975 dalam film|1975]]
|''[[Jaws (film)|Jaws]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|470653591}} ({{nts|prefix=$|193700000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|9000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Jaws |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/5281/jaws |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="jaws" /><ref group="#">{{cite book |first=Steven |last=Priggé |title=Movie Moguls Speak: Interviews With Top Film Producers |year=2004 |publisher=[[McFarland & Company]] |isbn=9780786419296 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=40UTI-uUHpwC&pg=PA8 8] |quote=The budget for the first ''Jaws'' was $4 million and the picture wound up costing $9 million.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1976 dalam film|1976]]
|''[[Rocky]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|225000000}} ({{nts|prefix=$|77100000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|1075000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="HallNeale214">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA214 214]}}. "''Rocky'' was the "sleeper of the decade". Produced by UA and costing just under $1 million, it went on to earn a box-office gross of $117,235,247 in the United States and $225 million worldwide."</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson527">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA527 527]}}.
* ''Star Wars'': "Domestic Rentals: $127.0; Foreign Rentals: $141.5; Production Cost: $13.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''The Godfather'': "Domestic Rentals: $85.6; Foreign Rentals: $42.0; Production Cost: $7.2 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''Fiddler on the Roof'': "Domestic Rentals: $34.0; Foreign Rentals: $11.1; Production Cost: $9.0 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''Rocky'': "Domestic Rentals: $56.0; Foreign Rentals: $21.1; Production Cost: $1.6 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson583">{{citation |last=Block |first=Alex Ben |title=Rocky |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA583 583] |quote=The budget was $1,075,000 plus producer's fees of $100,000.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1977 dalam film|1977]]
|''[[Star Wars (film)|Star Wars]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|775398007}} <br> ({{nts|prefix=$|530000000}}{{ref |Star Wars|SW}}/{{nts|prefix=$|268500000}}{{ref |Rentals|R}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|11293151}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="star-wars-se">{{cite web |title=Star Wars (1977) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars4.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2012}}</ref><ref group="#" name="et first-run">{{cite news |last=Wuntch |first=Philip |work=[[The Dallas Morning News]] |title=Return of E.T. |date=July 19, 1985 |url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DM&p_text_direct-0=0ED3CD81CFEA1C2E&p_field_direct-0=document_id |url-access=subscription |accessdate=March 6, 2012 |quote=Its worldwide box-office gross was $619 million, toppling the record of $530 million set by Star Wars. }}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson527" /><ref group="#" name="HallNeale218">{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA218 218]}}. "Eventually costing $11,293,151, ''Star Wars'' was previewed at the Northpoint Theatre in San Francisco on May 1, 1977."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1978 dalam film|1978]]
|scope="row" | ''[[Grease (film)|Grease]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:394954752+192731+304583}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|341000000}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|6000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Grease |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/4188/grease |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Hofler |first=Robert |title=Party Animals: A Hollywood Tale of Sex, Drugs, and Rock 'N' Roll Starring the Fabulous Allan Carr |publisher=ReadHowYouWant.com |year=2010 |isbn=9781459600072 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=iqRezpQzUcAC&pg=PA145 145] |quote=Despite the fact that Grease was well on its way to becoming the highest-grossing movie musical in the world, and eventually grossed over $341 million...}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Denisoff & Romanowski (1991)" /><ref group="#">{{cite web|title=Grease (40th Anniversary)|website=[[Box Office Mojo]]|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?page=&wk=2018W34&id=_fGREASE401|accessdate=August 30, 2018}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1979 dalam film|1979]]
|''[[Moonraker (film)|Moonraker]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|210300000}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|31000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Bond grosses" /><ref group="#" name="kramer">''Kramer vs. Kramer''
* {{cite book |title=United & Babson Investment Report |year=1980 |volume=72 |publisher=[[Babson-United, Inc.]] |page= 262 |quote=Columbia Pictures Industries is continuing to rake in the box office dollars from its Oscar-winning ''Kramer vs. Kramer'', which has topped $100 million in domestic grosses and $70 million overseas. ''Kramer'', which cost less than $8 million to make, is now the second...}}
* {{cite book |last=Prince |first=Stephen |title=A New Pot of Gold: Hollywood Under the Electronic Rainbow, 1980–1989 |publisher=[[University of California Press]] |year=2002 |isbn=978-0-520-23266-2 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_M3nR4wI99AC&pg=PA7 7] |quote=Much of this was attributable to the performance of its hit film, ''Kramer vs. Kramer'' ($94 million worldwide and the number two film in the domestic market).}}</ref>
|-
|''[[Rocky II]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200182289}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|7000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Rocky II |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/8653/rocky-ii |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite news |last=Kilday |first=Greg |title=Rules of the Game |date=May 22, 1992 |work=[[Entertainment Weekly]] |issue=119 |url=http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,310543,00.html |accessdate=July 4, 2012 |archive-date=2018-12-25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225034800/https://ew.com/ew/article/0,,310543,00.html |dead-url=yes }}</ref><ref group="#" name="kramer" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1980 dalam film|1980]]
|''[[The Empire Strikes Back]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:538375067+9593937}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:538375067-67597694-57214766}}}}){{ref |Star Wars|SW}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|23000000}}–{{nts|32000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''The Empire Strikes Back''
* Total up to 2014: {{cite web |title=The Empire Strikes Back (1980) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars5.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2012 |quote=$538,375,067}}
* Special edition: {{cite web |title=The Empire Strikes Back (Special Edition) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars5se.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2012 |quote=North America: $67,597,694; Overseas: $57,214,766}}
* 2015 re-release: {{cite web |title=The Empire Strikes Back |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=00&id=starwars5.htm |accessdate=October 8, 2015 |quote=United Kingdom: $9,593,937}}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson519">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA519 519]}}.
* ''The Empire Strikes Back'': "Production Cost: $32.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''Return of the Jedi'': "Production Cost: $42.7 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."
* ''The Phantom Menace'': "Production Cost: $127.5 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1981 dalam film|1981]]
| ''[[Raiders of the Lost Ark]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|389925971}} <br> ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:180100000+141766000}}}}–{{nts|{{#expr:212222025+141766000}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|18000000}}–{{nts|22800000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''Raiders of the Lost Ark''
* {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=raidersofthelostark.htm |title=Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=November 4, 2012 |quote=Total: $389,925,971; North America: $212,222,025 (original run); Overseas: $141,766,000}}
* {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA625 625]}}. Domestic Box office: $180.1; "Production Cost: $22.8 (Initial Release – Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1982 dalam film|1982]]
|''[[E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|792910554}} <br> ({{nts|prefix=$|619000000}}–{{nts|664000000}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|10500000}}–{{nts|12200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="ET">{{cite web |title=E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (1982) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=et.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2012}}</ref><ref group="#" name="et first-run" /><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson609">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA609 609]}}. "Steven Spielberg, by far the most successful director of the decade, had the highest-grossing movie with 1982's ''E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial'', which grossed over $664 million in worldwide box office on initial release."</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson652">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA652 652]}}. "Production Cost: $12.2 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1983 dalam film|1983]]
|''[[Return of the Jedi]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|475106177}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:475106177-45470437-43790543}}}}){{ref |Star Wars|SW}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|32500000}}–{{nts|42700000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''Return of the Jedi''
* Total: {{cite web |title=Return of the Jedi (1983) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars6.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2012 |quote=$475,106,177}}
* Special edition: {{cite web |title=Return of the Jedi (Special Edition) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars6se.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2012 |quote=North America: $45,470,437; Overseas: $43,790,543}}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson519" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1984 dalam film|1984]]
|''[[Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|333107271}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|27000000}}–{{nts|28200000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=indianajonesandthetempleofdoom.htm |accessdate=February 12, 2013}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler190" /><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson664">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA664 664]}}. "Production Cost: $28.2 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1985 dalam film|1985]]
|''[[Back to the Future]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:381109762+2315159+5628876}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|381109762}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|19000000}}–{{nts|22000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''Back to the Future''
* Original release: {{cite web |title=Back to the Future (1985) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=backtothefuture.htm |accessdate=August 18, 2014 |quote=Worldwide: $381,109,762; Production Budget: $19 million}}
* 2010 reisue: {{cite web |title=Back to the Future (2010 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fBACKTOTHEFUTURE01 |accessdate=August 10, 2014 |quote=Foreign Total: $2,315,159}}
* 2014 reisue: {{cite web |title=Back to the Future (2014 re-issue) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fBACKTOTHEFUTURE02 |accessdate=August 31, 2014 |quote=United Kingdom: $5,628,876}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA268 268]}}. "The studio had a record operating income of $212 million in 1982, the year of Spielberg's ''E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial'' (which had cost only slightly over $10 million) and $150 million in 1985, mainly due to another Spielberg production, the $22 million Back to the Future, which became the top box office hit of the year."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1986 dalam film|1986]]
|''[[Top Gun]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|356830601}} ({{nts|prefix=$|345000000}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14000000}}–{{nts|19000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Top Gun |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/10391/top-gun |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{citation |last=McAdams |first=Frank |title=Top Gun |year=2010 |pages=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA678#v=twopage 678–679] |quote=Production Cost: $19.0 (Millions of $s) ... Despite mixed reviews, it played in the top 10 for an extended period and was a huge hit, grossing almost $345 million in worldwide box office.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler190">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA190#v=twopage 190–191]}}.</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1987 dalam film|1987]]
|''[[Fatal Attraction]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|320145905}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|14000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">''Fatal Attraction''
* {{cite web |title=Fatal Attraction |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/3401/fatal-attraction |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}
* {{cite news |last=Scott |first=Vernon |agency=Hollywood (UPI) |work=[[The Daily Gazette]] |location=New York |title='Three Men and Baby' Sequel Adds Cazenove to Original Cast |date=June 15, 1990 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=FHMhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=tIgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4281,3825772 9] (TV Plus – The Daily Gazette Supplement) |quote=That legacy is the $167,780,960 domestic box-office and $75 million foreign gross achieved by the original...}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler190" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1988 dalam film|1988]]
|''[[Rain Man]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|354825476}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Rain Man |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/8322/rain-man |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA244 244]}}. "''Rain Man'': 30.0 (cost in million $s)"</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1989 dalam film|1989]]
|''[[Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|474171806}}–{{nts|494000000}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|36000000}}–{{nts|55400000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=indianajonesandthelastcrusade.htm |title=Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=September 15, 2013}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler190" /><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson694">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA694#v=twopage 694–695]}}. "Production Cost: $55.4 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) ... The film went on to haul in over $494 million worldwide."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1990 dalam film|1990]]
|''[[Ghost (film 1990)|Ghost]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|505702423}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|22000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Ghost |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/3943/ghost |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler190" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1991 dalam film|1991]]
|''[[Terminator 2: Judgment Day]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:<!-- ORIGINAL RELEASE-->519843345+<!-- 3D REISSUE-->(<!--DOM-->1037809)+(<!--INT-->2893302)}}}} ($519,843,345)
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|94000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Terminator 2">''Terminator 2''
* Original release: {{cite web |title=Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminator2.htm |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170626051349/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminator2.htm |archivedate=June 26, 2017 |quote=$519,843,345}}
* 3D re-release: {{cite web |title=Terminator 2: Judgment Day (1991) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=judgmentday3d.htm |accessdate=September 20, 2017}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Ansen (1991)">{{Cite news |last=Ansen |first=David |work=[[Newsweek]] |date=8 July 1991 |title=Conan The Humanitarian |url=http://www.newsweek.com/1991/07/07/conan-the-humanitarian.html |accessdate=September 19, 2013}}
</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1992 dalam film|1992]]
|''[[Aladdin (film Disney 1992)|Aladdin]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|504050045}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|28000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Aladdin |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/285/aladdin |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Disney" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[1993 dalam film|1993]]
| ''[[Jurassic Park (film)|Jurassic Park]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:1029153882+786021}}}} (${{formatnum:914691118}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|63000000}}–{{nts|70000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="jp">''Jurassic Park''
* Total: {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jurassicpark.htm |title=Jurassic Park (1993) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=September 15, 2013 |quote=Worldwide: $1,029,153,882; Production Budget: $63 million}}
* Original release: {{cite web |title=Jurassic Park (1993) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jurassicpark.htm |accessdate=April 5, 2013 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130119003445/http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jurassicpark.htm |archivedate=January 19, 2013 |quote=$914,691,118}}
* 2011 re-release: {{cite web |title=Jurassic Park (2011 re-release) |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fJURASSICPARK201&country=UK&wk=2011W38&id=_fJURASSICPARK201 |accessdate=January 17, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo |quote=United Kingdom: $786,021}}
* As of 2010: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA756#v=twopage 756–757]}}. "Production Cost: $70.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s) ... ''Jurassic Park'' was a smash at the box office, bringing in $920 million in worldwide box office and spawning two sequels."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1994 dalam film|1994]]
|''[[The Lion King]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|968483777}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:312855561+450600000}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|45000000}}–{{nts|79300000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="lion king">''The Lion King''
* Total: {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=lionking.htm |title=The Lion King (1994) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=Worldwide: $968,483,777; Production Budget: $45 million}}
* Lifetime grosses (US & Canada): {{cite web |title=The Lion King (1994) – Release Summary |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=releases&id=lionking.htm |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=Initial: $312,855,561; IMAX: $15,686,215; 3D: $94,242,001}}
* Lifetime grosses (outside US & Canada): {{cite web |first=Brad |last=Brevert |title='X-Men' & 'Alice' Lead Soft Memorial Day Weekend; Disney Tops $4 Billion Worldwide |date=May 29, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=4191 |accessdate=May 29, 2016 |quote=...the original release of The Lion King made $450.6 million internationally, an additional $3.8 million with the 2002 IMAX reissue, and another $91.3 million from 2011's 3D reissue for an international total of $545.7 million.}}
* As of 2010: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA764 764]}}. "Production Cost: $79.3 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" rowspan="2" | [[1995 dalam film|1995]]
|''[[Toy Story]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|373554033}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:373554033-8680257}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|30000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Toy Story">''Toy Story''
* Total: {{cite web |title=Toy Story (1995) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=toystory.htm |accessdate=November 16, 2014 |quote=Worldwide: $373,554,033}}
* 3D release: {{cite web |title=Toy Story in 3D (2009) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?page=&view=bycountry&id=_fTOYSTORYIN3D01 |accessdate=November 16, 2014 |quote=Foreign Total: $8,680,257}}</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson776">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA776 776]}}. "Production Cost: $30.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)"</ref>
|-
|''[[Die Hard with a Vengeance]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|366101666}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|70000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Die Hard: With A Vengeance |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/2715/die-hard-with-a-vengeance |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler123">{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA123 123]}}.</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1996 dalam film|1996]]
|''[[Independence Day (film 1996)|Independence Day]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|817400891}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|75000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="id4">{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=independenceday.htm |title=Independence Day (1996) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=September 13, 2009}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1997 dalam film|1997]]
|''[[Titanic (film 1997)|Titanic]]''
| align="right" |<!--UPDATE-->${{formatnum:2187463944}}<!--UPDATE--> (${{formatnum:1843201268}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="titanic">''Titanic''
* Total: {{cite web |title=Titanic (1997) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=titanic.htm |accessdate=December 10, 2017|quote=$2,187,425,379}}
* Original release: {{cite web |title=Titanic (1997) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=titanic.htm |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120321035129/http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=titanic.htm |archivedate=March 21, 2012 |quote=$1,843,201,268}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1998 dalam film|1998]]
|''[[Armageddon (film 1998)|Armageddon]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|553709626}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|140000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |title=Armageddon |website=[[Boxoffice (majalah)|Boxoffice]] |url=http://pro.boxoffice.com/movie/612/armageddon |accessdate=May 29, 2016}}</ref><ref group="#">{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA509 509]}}. "Production Cost: $140.0 (Unadjusted $s in Millions of $s)."</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1999 dalam film|1999]]
|''[[Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace]]''
| align="right" |<!--UPDATE-->${{formatnum:1027044677}}<!--UPDATE--> (${{formatnum:924317558}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|115000000}}–{{nts|127500000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="tpm">''Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace''
* Total: {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars.htm |title=Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=April 2, 2012 |quote=$1,027,044,677}}
* Original release: {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars.htm |title=Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999) |website=Box Office Mojo |accessdate=November 8, 2012 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110719051149/http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars.htm |archivedate=July 19, 2011 |quote=$924,317,558}}
</ref><ref group="#" name="BlockWilson519" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[2000 dalam film|2000]]
|''[[Mission: Impossible 2]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|546388105}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|100000000}}–{{nts|125000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=mi2.htm |title=Mission: Impossible II |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=January 6, 2012}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Finler190" />
|-
! scope="row" | [[2001 dalam film|2001]]
|''[[Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (film)|Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|975051288}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:975051288-295917}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|125000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="hp1">''Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone''
*Total: {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=harrypotter.htm |title=Harry Potter and the Sorceror's Stone (2001) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=January 31, 2019}}
* Re-release (2018): {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=harrypottersorcerer18.htm |title=Harry Potter & the Sorcerer's Stone (2018 re-release) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=January 31, 2019 |quote=North America: $295,917}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2002 dalam film|2002]]
|''[[The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:926047111+<!--KOREA (WW total does not include it)-->302597}}}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:926047111-1996877-1505170-764607}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|94000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="lotr2">''The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers''
* Total: {{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=twotowers.htm |accessdate=March 4, 2012 |quote=$926,047,111}}
* Re-release (2003): {{cite web |title=The Two Towers (Re-issue) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=twotowers03.htm |accessdate=March 4, 2012 |quote=North America: $1,996,877; Overseas: $1,505,170}}
* Re-release (2011): {{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2011 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=twotowers03.htm |accessdate=March 4, 2012 |quote=North America: $764,607}}
* Re-release (2017): {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING04|title=The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2017 re-release) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=February 6, 2017 |quote=South Korea: $302,597}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2003 dalam film|2003]]
|''[[The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:1119929521+<!--KOREA-->307481}}}} (${{formatnum:{{#expr:1119929521-818580}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|94000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="lotr3">''The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King''
* Total: {{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=returnoftheking.htm |accessdate=March 4, 2012 |quote=$1,119,929,521}}
* Re-release (2011): {{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2011 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=rotk2011.htm |accessdate=March 4, 2012 |quote=North America: $818,580}}
* Re-release (2017): {{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2017 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING05 |accessdate=February 6, 2017 |quote=South Korea: $307,481}}
</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2004 dalam film|2004]]
|''[[Shrek 2]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|919838758}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="shrek2">{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=shrek2.htm |title=Shrek 2 (2002) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=February 5, 2009}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2005 dalam film|2005]]
|''[[Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (film)|Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|897099794}} ({{nts|prefix=$|{{#expr:897099794-188716}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="hp4">''Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire''
*Total: {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=harrypotter4.htm |title=Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=March 1, 2019}}
*Re-release (2018): {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=harrypotter42018.htm |title=Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2018 re-release) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=March 1, 2019 |quote=North America: $188,716}}
</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2006 dalam film|2006]]
|''[[Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1066179725}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|225000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="potc2">{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=piratesofthecaribbean2.htm |title=Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest (2006) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=January 11, 2010}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2007 dalam film|2007]]
|''[[Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End]]''
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|963420425}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|300000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="potc3">{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=piratesofthecaribbean3.htm |title=Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End (2007) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=June 15, 2011}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2008 dalam film|2008]]
|''[[The Dark Knight (film)|The Dark Knight]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1004558444}} (${{formatnum:{{#expr:531039412+466000000}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|185000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="tdk">''The Dark Knight''
* Total: {{cite web |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=darkknight.htm |title=The Dark Knight (2008) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=October 28, 2012 |quote=Total: $1,004,558,444}}
* Original release (excluding 2009 IMAX reissue): {{cite web |title=The Dark Knight |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services. LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/2008/BATM2.php |accessdate=October 28, 2012 |quote=North America: $531,039,412 (as of January 22, 2009); Overseas: $466,000,000; IMAX re-release: January 23, 2009 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090208015630/http://the-numbers.com/movies/2008/BATM2.php |archivedate=February 8, 2009}}
* 2009 IMAX re-release: {{cite web |title=Warner Bros. Entertainment Wraps Record-Breaking Year |date=January 8, 2009 |publisher=[[Warner Bros.]] |url=http://www.warnerbros.com/studio/news/warner-bros-entertainment-wraps-record-breaking-year |accessdate=April 22, 2016 |quote=With worldwide receipts of $997 million, “The Dark Knight” is currently fourth on the all-time box office gross list, and the film is being re-released theatrically on January 23.}}
* First-run gross and IMAX reissue: {{cite web |first=Brandon |last=Gray |title=Billion Dollar Batman |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |date=February 20, 2009 |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2551 |accessdate=June 7, 2014 |quote=The Dark Knight had been hovering just shy of $1 billion for several months and reportedly sat at $997 million when Warner Bros. modestly relaunched it on Jan. 23, timed to take advantage of the announcement of the Academy Awards nominations on Jan. 22.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2009 dalam film|2009]]
|''[[Avatar (film 2009)|Avatar]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2789679794}} (${{formatnum:{{#expr:2782275172-10741486-22469358}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|237000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="avatar">''Avatar''
* Total: {{cite web |title=Avatar (2009) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avatar.htm |accessdate=July 21, 2019 |quote=$2,789,679,794}}
* Total as of 2013: {{cite web |title=Avatar (2009) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avatar.htm |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131023173250/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=avatar.htm |archivedate=October 23, 2013 |quote=$2,782,275,172}}
* Special edition: {{cite web |title=Avatar (Special Edition) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avatarspecialedition.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2012 |quote=North America: $10,741,486; Overseas: $22,469,358}}</ref><ref group="#" name="Patten (2009)">{{cite news |last=Patten |first=D. |title='Avatar's' True Cost—and Consequences |url=http://www.thewrap.com/article/true-cost-and-consequences-avatar-11206?page=1 |date=December 3, 2009 |publisher=The Wrap |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091205175252/http://www.thewrap.com/article/true-cost-and-consequences-avatar-11206 |archivedate=December 5, 2009}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2010 dalam film|2010]]
|''[[Toy Story 3]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1066969703}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="ts3">{{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=toystory3.htm |title=Toy Story 3 (2010) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=March 17, 2010}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2011 dalam film|2011]]
|''[[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1341693157}} (${{formatnum:{{#expr:1341693157-181938}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000000}}{{ref |HP budget|HP}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="hp7.2">''Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2''
* Total: {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=harrypotter72.htm |title=Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 (2011) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=March 1, 2019}}
* Re-release (2018): {{cite web |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=harrypotter7b18.htm |title=Harry Potter & the Deathly Hallows - Part 2 (2018 re-release) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |accessdate=January 31, 2019 |quote=North America: $181,938}}
* Production cost: {{cite news |last=Frankel |first=Daniel |title=Get Ready for the Biggest 'Potter' Opening Yet |work=[[The Wrap]] |date=17 November 2010 |url=http://www.thewrap.com/movies/article/get-ready-biggest-potter-opening-yet-22607 |accessdate=August 27, 2011}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2012 dalam film|2012]]
| ''[[The Avengers (film 2012)|The Avengers]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1518812988}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|220000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="avengers">{{cite web |title=The Avengers (2012) |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avengers11.htm |accessdate=January 28, 2017}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2013 dalam film|2013]]
| ''[[Frozen (film 2013)|Frozen]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:{{#expr:1274219009-<!--JAPAN TOTAL BY 8/3/2014-->247650477+<!--JAPAN TOTAL-->249036646-<!--SPAIN TOTAL BY 7/27/2014-->21668593+<!--SPAIN TOTAL-->22492845+<!--NIGERIA TOTAL-->167333+<!--UK-->(40960083-39090985)/0.63866+(41087765-40960083)/0.64136+(41170608-41087765)/0.636+(42840559-41170608)/0.7497+(42976318-42840559)/0.742+<!--GERMANY-->42526744-35098170 round -6}}}} (${{formatnum:{{#expr:1274219009-<!--JAPAN TOTAL BY 8/3/2014-->247650477+<!--JAPAN TOTAL-->249036646-<!--SPAIN TOTAL BY 7/27/2014-->21668593+<!--SPAIN TOTAL-->22492845+<!--NIGERIA TOTAL-->167333+<!--UK-->(40960083-39090985)/0.63866+(41087765-40960083)/0.64136+(41170608-41087765)/0.636+<!--GERMANY-->42526744-35098170 round -6}}}})
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|150000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Frozen" >
''Frozen''
* {{cite web |title=Frozen (2013) – International Box Office Results |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=frozen2013.htm |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20140809232736/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=frozen2013.htm |archivedate=August 9, 2014 |quote=Worldwide – $1,274,219,009 (total as of August 8, 2014; including Japanese gross up to August 3, Spanish gross up to July 27, UK gross up to June 8, German gross up to March 30, and omitting Nigerian gross)}}
* {{cite web |title=Frozen (2013) – International Box Office Results: Japan |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=JP&id=frozen2013.htm |accessdate=September 3, 2014}}
::Total as of August 3, 2014: $247,650,477
::Total as of August 31, 2014: $249,036,646
* {{cite web |title=Frozen (2013) – International Box Office Results: Nigeria |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=NG&id=frozen2013.htm |accessdate=September 3, 2014}}
::Total as of August 17, 2014: $167,333
* {{cite web |title=Frozen (2013) – International Box Office Results: Spain |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=ES&id=frozen2013.htm |accessdate=November 6, 2014}}
::Total as of July 27, 2014: $21,668,593
::Total as of November 2, 2014: $22,492,845
* {{cite web |title=Frozen (2013) – International Box Office Results: United Kingdom |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=UK&id=frozen2013.htm |accessdate=March 30, 2016}}
::Total as of June 8, 2014: £39,090,985
::Total as of November 30, 2014: £40,960,083 ($1 = £0.63866)
::Total as of December 7, 2014: £41,087,765 ($1 = £0.64136)
::Total as of December 14, 2014: £41,170,608 ($1 = £0.636)
::Total as of November 26, 2017: £42,840,559 ($1 = £0.7497)
::Total as of December 3, 2017: £42,976,318 ($1 = £0.742)
* {{cite web |title=Frozen (2013) – International Box Office Results: Germany |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=DE&id=frozen2013.htm |accessdate=March 30, 2016}}
::Total as of March 30, 2014: €35,098,170
::Total as of October 18, 2015: €42,526,744
:::nb. the exact euro to dollar conversion rate is unknown for earnings since April 2014, but the euro never fell below parity with the dollar during 2014 and 2015 (as can be verified by comparing the exchange rate on the individual date entries at the provided reference) so an approximate conversion rate of €1: $1 is used here to give a lower-bound. <!-- THIS HAS RECEIVED A CONSENSUS ON THE TALK PAGE AS IT IS BELIEVED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH WP:CALC WHICH PERMITS BASIC CALCULATIONS, SO IF YOU WISH TO CHALLENGE THE TOTAL INCLUDED HERE PLEASE RAISE THE ISSUE ON THE TALK PAGE FIRST --></ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2014 dalam film|2014]]
|''[[Transformers: Age of Extinction]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1104039076}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|210000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="transformers"/>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2015 dalam film|2015]]
|''[[Star Wars: The Force Awakens]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2068223624}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|245000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" | <ref group="#" name="sw7"/>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2016 dalam film|2016]]
|''[[Captain America: Civil War]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1153304495}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|250000000}}
| style="text-align:center;" | <ref group="#" name="civil war"/>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2017 dalam film|2017]]
| ''[[Star Wars: The Last Jedi]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:1332539889}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|200000000}}
|style="text-align:center;" | <ref group="#" name="sw8"/>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2018 dalam film|2018]]
|scope="row" | ''[[Avengers: Infinity War]]''
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2048359754}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|316000000}}–{{nts|400000000}}
|style="text-align:center;" | <ref group="#" name="infinity war"/><ref group="#" name="VarietyBudget">{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2018/film/box-office/avengers-infinity-war-biggest-box-office-opening-ever-1202791751/|title='Avengers: Infinity War' Officially Lands Biggest Box Office Opening of All Time|last=Rubin|first=Rebecca|website=[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]]|date=April 30, 2018|accessdate=May 14, 2018|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180502205129/http://variety.com/2018/film/box-office/avengers-infinity-war-biggest-box-office-opening-ever-1202791751/|archivedate=May 2, 2018|deadurl=no}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[2019 dalam film|2019]]
|scope="row" style="background:#b6fcb6;" | ''[[Avengers: Endgame]]'' {{†|alt=film masih diputar}}
| align="right" |${{formatnum:2796274401}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|356000000}}<br />
|style="text-align:center;" | <ref group="#" name="endgame"/>
|}
{{Refbegin}}
(...) Karena penghasilan kotor tidak terbatas kepada penayangan perdananya di bioskop, penghasilan kotor perdana film dicantumkan dalam kurung setelah totalnya (jika diketahui).
{{note label|USgross|*||Penghasilan kotor Kanada dan Amerika Serikat saja.}}
{{note label|Rentals|R||Sewa distributor.}}
{{note label|Intolerance|IN||Tidak ada sumber waktu itu yang mencantumkan penghasilan ''20,000 Leagues Under the Sea'', tetapi [[The Numbers (situs web)|The Numbers]] memperkirakan penghasilan kotor box office di Amerika Utara mencapai $8.000.000.<ref>{{cite web |title=20,000 Leagues Under the Sea |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services, LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1916/020LU.php |accessdate=January 5, 2012}}</ref> Namun, angka ini bisa jadi salah diambil dari penghasilan kotor film versi baru tahun 1954 yang juga meraup $8.000.000 sebagai hasil sewa di Amerika Utara.<ref name=Finler358/>}}
{{note label|For Heaven's Sake|FH||Sejumlah sumebr seperti The Numbers menyatakan bahwa ''Aloma of the South Seas'' adalah film berpenghasilan tertinggi tahun itu dengan total $3 juta.<ref>{{cite book |title=Milwaukee Magazine |volume=32 |issue=1–6 |year=2007 |quote=The year's top–grossing movie, ''Aloma'' made $3 million in the first three months and brought Gray back to Milwaukee for its opening at the Wisconsin Theatre.|title-link=Milwaukee Magazine }}</ref> Akan tetapi, tidak ada sumber waktu itu yang mencantumkan penghasilan ''Aloma of the South Seas''. Jadi, tidak jelas dari mana $3 juta itu. Kalau itu penghasilan kotor sewa, maka film ini bukan saja film berpenghasilan tertinggi tahun itu, tetapi juga salah satu film berpenghasilan tertinggi sepanjang zaman film bisu. Apabila benar demikian, ini tidak lazim karena ''International Motion Picture Almanac'' dan ''Variety'' tidak mencantumkannya di daftar mereka.}}
{{note label|Sunny Side Up|SS||Belum jelas apakah angka ''Sunny Side Up'' untuk Amerika Utara saja atau global. Sumber lain mencantumkan $2 juta.<ref>{{cite book |last=Parkinson |first=David |title=The Rough Guide to Film Musicals |publisher=[[Dorling Kindersley]] |year=2007 |isbn=9781843536505 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Zff4BhUOOnwC&pg=PA28 28] |quote=But they had previously succeeded in showing how musicals could centre on ordinary people with ''Sunny Side Up'' (1929), which had grossed $2 million at the box office and demonstrated a new maturity and ingenuity in the staging of story and dance.}}</ref> Artinya, angka yang lebih tinggi ini mungkin merupakan hasil sewa global karena penghitungan hasil internasional waktu itu masih belum mapan.<ref name=HallNeale6/>}}
{{note label|One Night|ON||Angka ''It Happened One Night'' tidak benar-benar mencerminkan kesuksesannya: film ini didistribusikan dengan cara dipaketkan dengan lebih dari dua puluhan film Columbia lainnya dan total penghasilannya dirata-ratakan; penghasilan kotor sejatinya bisa jadi lebih tinggi.}}
{{note label|Snow White|S7||Penghasilan kumulatif global sebesar $418 juta yang diterima ''Snow White'' tidak mencakup penghasilan di luar Amerika Utara sejak 1987 sampai seterusnya.}}
{{note label|GWTW|GW||Penghasilan ''Gone with the Wind'' dari penayangan perdananya tidak bisa dipastikan. Rata-rata catatan masa itu mencantumkan hasil sewa $32 juta di Amerika Utara. Catatan modern mengulang klaim tersebut; namun, angka tersebut bisa jadi angka hasil sewa global. Catatan dagang mengolah data dengan mendapatkannya dari distributor yang ingin memasarkan film sukses atau menyurvei bioskop dan membuat perkiraan. Distributor biasanya melaporkan harga sewa global karena angka yang lebih tinggi membuat film ini seolah sukses, sedangkan perkiraan hanya terbatas pada penghasilan di Amerika Utara; karena itu, sudah biasa apabila hasil sewa global dan Amerika Utara bercampur. Pada awal Perang Dunia II, banyak pasar asing tertutup bagi Hollywood sehingga industri perfilman mulai melaporkan penghasilan box office Amerika Utara saja.<ref name=HallNeale6>{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA6 6]–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA7 7]}}. "For similar reasons of accountability, ''Variety'' has typically used figures for domestic (U.S. and Canadian) rather than worldwide revenue. This became its standard policy in 1940, when the advent of war in Europe persuaded the American film industry (temporarily, as it turned out) that it should be wholly reliant on the home market for profitability. Where specific rentals data are reported in ''Variety'' before this (which tended to be only sporadically) they were often for worldwide rather domestic performance. This was also the case with other trade sources, such as ''Quigley''{{'}}s annual ''Motion Picture Almanac'', which published its own all-time hits lists from the early 1930s onward. The subsequent confusion of domestic and worldwide figures, and of rental and box-office figures, has plagued many published accounts of Hollywood history (sometimes including those in ''Variety'' itself), and we have attempted to be diligant in clarifying the differences between them."</ref> Sesuai pendekatan baru ini, harga sewa ''Gone with the Wind'' di Amerika Utara direvisi menjadi $21 juta tahun 1947 ($11 juta lebih sedikit daripada angka sebelumnya),<ref>{{cite news |last=Shearer |first=Lloyd |title=GWTW: Supercolossal Saga of an Epic |date=October 26, 1947 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/movies/bestpictures/wind-ar6.html |accessdate=July 14, 2012}}</ref> dan pada 1953—usai penayangan ulang 1947—''Variety'' melaporkan penghasilan $26 juta.<ref>{{cite news |title=Cinema: The Big Grossers |date=February 2, 1953 |work=[[Time (majalah)|Time]] |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,817905,00.html |accessdate=September 15, 2012 |archive-date=2013-08-23 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130823211610/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,817905,00.html |dead-url=yes }}</ref> Pada 1956, MGM melaporkan penghasilan kumulatif Amerika Utara sebesar $30.015.000 dan penghasilan luar negeri sebesar $18.964.000 dari tiga film.<ref name=BlockWilson129>{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA129&q=%22Gone%20with%20the%20Wind%20includes%20initial%20release%20plus%20four%20rereleases%20(1941%2C1942%2C1947%20and%201954)%20since%20foreign%20rental%20revenues%20were%20available%20only%20cumulative%20through%201956.%22 129]}}. "Domestic Rentals: $30,015,000 (61%); Foreign Rentals: $18,964,000 (39%)...Gone with the Wind includes initial release plus four rereleases (1941,1942,1947 and 1954) since foreign rental revenues were available only cumulative through 1956."</ref> Hasil sewa global senilai $32 juta dari penayangan perdananya cocok dengan angka yang direvisi dan angka global yang dilaporkan: angka-angka ini menunjukkan bahwa film ini meraup $21 juta di Amerika Utara dan $11 juta di luar negeri lewat penayangan perdana, ditambah $9 juta di Amerika Utara dan $8 juta di luar negeri lewat serangkaian penayangan ulang hingga tahun 1956.}}
{{note label|Mom and Dad|MD||''Mom and Dad'' umumnya tidak masuk daftar 'film berpenghasilan tinggi' seperti daftarnya ''Variety'' karena distribusinya independen. Film ini pada dasarnya tergolong [[film eksploitasi]] dan dipasarkan sebagai [[film panduan sosial|film pendidikan seks]] untuk mengakali [[penyensoran film|sensor film]]. Karena berselisih dengan [[Motion Picture Production Code]], ''Mom and Dad'' dilarang beredar besar-besaran dan dibatasi untuk tayang di bioskop independen dan [[bioskop mobil]]. Ini adalah film tersukses di genrenya dan masih beredar hingga 1970-an ketika [[pornografi radikal]] mulai berkembang. Pada penghujung 1947, film ini meraup $2 juta. Tahun 1949, $8 juta. Tahun 1956, film ini mendapat $22 juta dari hasil sewa dengan penghasilan kotor $80 juta dan seharusnya bisa masuk sepuluh film tersukses pada akhir 1940-an dan awal 1950-an. Penghasilan totalnya diperkirakan mencapai $100 juta.}}
{{note label|Unconquered|UN||Chopra-Gant menyatakan bahwa angka ''Unconquered'' adalah penghasilan box office Amerika Utara, tetapi tabel yang mereka gunakan tidak memisahkan penghasilan kotor global dan Amerika Utara. Sumber lain menyatakan bahwa angka ''Forever Amber'' ($8 juta) dan ''Life with Father'' ($6,5 juta)<ref>{{citation |last=McDermott |first=Christine |title=Life with Father |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA307 307] |quote=No matter what the billing, the movie became a worldwide hit with $6.5 million in worldwide rentals, from Pappa och vi in Sweden to Vita col padre in Italy, although it booked a net loss of $350,000.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref> sebenarnya merupakan penghasilan kotor sewa global. Jadi, angka ''Unconquered'' bisa jadi berarti itu.}}
{{note label|Cinerama|CI||Angka [[Cinerama]] mencerminkan penghasilan kotor. Karena Cinerama memiliki bioskop, tidak ada harga sewa untuk film. Artinya, studio menerima 100% penghasilan kotor box office, berbeda dengan rata-rata film lain yang pendapatan distributornya tidak sampai separuh penghasilan kotor. Karena ''Variety'' waktu itu memeringkatkan film berdasarkan hasil sewa AS, mereka membuat perkiraan hasil sewa untuk film-film Cinerama supaya bisa dibandingkan dengan film-film lain di tabel mereka. Dalam ''This Is Cinerama'', penghasilan kotor global $50 juta diperbaiki menjadi penghasilan kotor sewa AS $12.5 juta; angka ini 25% dari jumlah yang dilaporkan Cinerama. Rumus ''Variety'' tampaknya memangkas separuh penghasilan kotor untuk mengetahui perkiraan AS, lalu memangkasnya lagi separuh untuk menyimulasikan harga sewa. Angka sewa ''Variety'' sering diulang, tetapi tidak ada dasarnya—angka ini dikarang-karang untuk keperluan analisis perbandingan.<ref>{{cite news |last=Mulligan |first=Hugh A. |work=[[The Register-Guard]] |location=Eugene, Oregon |title=Cinerama Pushing Ahead As Biggest Money-Maker |date=September 23, 1956 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GPRVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=YeIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6899,3861317 7B] }}</ref> Kelima film Cinerama secara keseluruhan meraup penghasilan box office global sebesar $120 juta.<ref>{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA145 145]}}. "The commercial success of the five Cinerama travelogues, which earned an aggregate worldwide box-office gross of $120 million by 1962 (including $82 million in the United States and Canada), nevertheless demonstrated to the mainstream industry the market value of special screen formats."</ref>}}
{{note label|Greatest Show|GS||''Variety'' menyatakan hasil sewa global ''The Greatest Show on Earth'' sekitar $18,35 juta ($12,8 juta di antaranya berasal dari Amerika Serikat<ref name=Finler358>{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA358 358]}}</ref>) satu tahun usai dirilis. Namun, Birchard mencantumkan angka di atas $15 juta hingga 1962. Angka Birchard bisa jadi hasil sewa kotor Amerika Utara saja dan mencakup penghasilan dari penayangan ulang tahun 1954 dan 1960.}}
{{note label|Star Wars|SW||Penghasilan kotor "penayangan perdana" ''Star Wars'' tidak mencakup penghasilan dari penayangan edisi khusus tahun 1997. Akan tetapi, angka ini tidak mencakup penghasilan dari penayangan ulang sebelum edisi khusus.}}
{{note label|HP budget|HP||Biaya produksi dibagi dengan ''Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1''.}}
{{Refend}}
== Garis waktu film berpenghasilan tertinggi ==
[[
Sedikitnya sebelas film memegang rekor 'film berpenghasilan tertinggi' sejak ''The Birth of a Nation'' menempati peringkat pertama pada tahun 1915. ''The Birth of a Nation'' dan ''Gone with the Wind'' masing-masing bertahan sebagai film berpenghasilan tertinggi selama 25 tahun berturut-turut. Rekor ini juga dipegang tiga kali oleh film-film Steven Spielberg dan dua kali oleh film-film James Cameron. Spielberg menjadi sutradara pertama yang memecahkan rekornya sendiri ketika ''Jurassic Park'' mengalahkan ''E.T.''. Cameron mengulangi hal yang sama ketika ''Avatar'' mengalahkan rekor ''Titanic''. Saat merebut peringkat pertama tahun 2019, ''Avengers: Endgame'' menjadi film sekuel pertama yang memegang rekor film berpenghasilan tertinggi. Dengan demikian, berakhir pula dominasi Spielberg/Cameron selama 36 tahun.
Beberapa sumber mengklaim ''The Big Parade'' mengalahkan ''The Birth of a Nation'' sebagai film berpenghasilan tertinggi, lalu digantikan oleh ''Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs'' yang tidak lama kemudian digeser oleh ''Gone with the Wind''.<ref name="Dirks (2010)" /> Penghasilan pasti ''The Birth of a Nation'' tidak diketahui, tetapi penghasilan globalnya diperkirakan mencapai $5,2 juta tahun 1919 menurut perkiraan modern.<ref name="Wasko">{{cite book |last=Wasko |first=Janet |contribution=D.W. Griffiths and the banks: a case study in film financing |editor-last=Kerr |editor-first=Paul |title=The Hollywood Film Industry: A Reader |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=1986 |isbn=9780710097309 |page=[https://books.google.com/books?id=jMINAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA34 34] |quote=Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a 'conservative estimate'. For years ''Variety'' has listed ''The Birth of a Nation'''s total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This 'trade legend' has finally been acknowledged by ''Variety'' as a 'whopper myth', and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.}}</ref> Penayangan luar negerinya tertunda akibat Perang Dunia I. Film ini baru dirilis di luar negeri tahun 1920-an; dengan menghitung penayangan perdana beruntun di Amerika Serikat, penghasilan $10 juta yang dilaporkan ''[[Variety (majalah)|Variety]]'' tahun 1932 cocok dengan perkiraan di atas.<ref name="Variety (1932)">{{cite news |title=Biggest Money Pictures |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_variety_1932-06-21_107_2/page/1 |work=[[Variety (
[[
Film lain yang diklaim sebagai film berpenghasilan tertinggi adalah [[film pornografi]] ''[[Deep Throat (film)|Deep Throat]]'' (1972). Pada tahun 1984, [[Linda Lovelace]] bersaksi di hadapan Subkomite Kehakiman Senat Amerika Serikat Bidang Hukum Di Bawah Umur bahwa film ini meraup $600 juta;<ref>{{cite news |author=Washington (AP) |work=[[The Free Lance–Star]] |title='Deep Throat' star against pornography |date=September 13, 1984 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=deJLAAAAIBAJ&sjid=x4sDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5792,1886785 12]}}</ref> angka ini menuai banyak perdebatan karena apabila benar, penghasilan film ini melampaui ''Star Wars'' sehingga ''Deep Throat'' menjadi film berpenghasilan tertinggi sampai akhir 1970-an. Pendapat utama yang membantah angka tersebut adalah film ini tidak dirilis secara luas sehingga penghasilan kotor sebesar itu tidak mungkin terwujud.<ref>{{cite news |last=Hiltzik |first=Michael |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |title='Deep Throat' Numbers Just Don't Add Up |date=February 24, 2005 |url=http://articles.latimes.com/2005/feb/24/business/fi-golden24 |accessdate=February 2, 2012}}</ref> Angka pastinya tidak diketahui, tetapi kesaksian dalam persidangan federal tahun 1976—empat tahun setelah film dirilis—menunjukkan film ini menghasilkan lebih dari $25 juta.<ref>{{cite news |author=Memphis (UPI) |work=[[The Palm Beach Post]] |title='Deep Throat' Defendant Found Guilty of Conspiring |date=May 1, 1976 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=5lc0AAAAIBAJ&sjid=YM0FAAAAIBAJ&pg=1025,8602 A2]}}</ref> [[Roger Ebert]] mengira film ini mungkin menghasilkan $600 juta di atas kertas karena mafia memegang kepemilikan [[bioskop dewasa]] waktu itu dan akan [[pencucian uang|mencuci uang]] obat-obatan terlarang dan prostitusi di bioskop. Mafia mungkin saja melebih-lebihkan pendapatan box office film ini.<ref>{{cite web |last=Ebert |first=Roger |authorlink=Roger Ebert |website=[[rogerebert.com]] |publisher=[[Chicago Sun-Times]] |title=Inside Deep Throat |date=February 11, 2005 |url=http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050210/REVIEWS/50128001 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606050046/http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20050210%2FREVIEWS%2F50128001 |archivedate=June 6, 2011 |deadurl=no |accessdate=February 2, 2012 }}</ref>
Baris 514 ⟶ 1.611:
! scope="row" | ''1940''
| style="text-align:right;" |$15,000,000{{ref |Rentals2|R}} {{ref |Reissue|‡}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Time (1940)">{{cite news |title=Show Business: Record Wind |date=February 19, 1940 |work=[[Time (
|-
! scope="row" | 1940<ref name="gwtw tcm">{{cite web |first1=Frank |last1=Miller |first2=Jeff |last2=Stafford |title=Gone With the Wind (1939) – Articles |date=January 5, 2007 |publisher=[[Turner Classic Movies]] |url=http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/414427/Gone-With-the-Wind/articles.html |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130926003430/http://www.tcm.com/tcmdb/title/414427/Gone-With-the-Wind/articles.html |archivedate=September 26, 2013}}</ref>
| rowspan="2" | ''[[Gone with the Wind (film)|Gone with the Wind]]''
| style="text-align:right;" |$32,000,000{{ref |Rentals2|R}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="gwtw tcm"/>
|-
! scope="row" | ''1963''
| style="text-align:right;" |$67,000,000{{ref |Rentals2|R}} {{ref |Reissue|‡}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="Thomas (1963)"/>
|-
! scope="row" | 1966<ref name="Dirks (2010)" />
Baris 543 ⟶ 1.640:
| ''[[Jaws (film)|Jaws]]''
| style="text-align:right;" | $193,700,000{{ref |Rentals2|R}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="jaws"/>
|-
! scope="row" | 1978<ref>{{cite news |author=New York (AP) |work=[[The StarPhoenix]] |title=Scariness of Jaws 2 unknown quantity |date=May 26, 1978 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=TpZjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=dnoNAAAAIBAJ&pg=5679,3145694 21]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Fenner |first=Pat C. |work=[[Evening Independent]] |title=Independent Action |date=January 16, 1978 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=JgAMAAAAIBAJ&sjid=mVgDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6721,49636 11-A]}}</ref>
| rowspan="2" | ''[[Star Wars (film)|Star Wars]]''
| style="text-align:right;" |$410,000,000/$268,500,000{{ref |Rentals2|R}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#" name="star-wars first-run">{{cite news |last=Harmetz |first=Aljean |work=[[The New York Times]] |title=The Saga Beyond 'Star Wars' |date=May 18, 1980 |url=https://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0617FE345D17728DDDA10994DD405B8084F1D3 |accessdate=January 30, 2012 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20131029224716/http://
|-
! scope="row" | ''1982''
Baris 594 ⟶ 1.691:
== Seri film berpenghasilan tertinggi ==
{{see also|Daftar seri media berpenghasilan kotor tertinggi}}
[[
Sebelum 2000, hanya tujuh [[seri film]] yang berpenghasilan kotor di atas $1 miliar di box office: ''[[James Bond dalam film|James Bond]]'',<ref>{{cite web |title=Box Office History for James Bond Movies |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services, LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/JamesBond.php |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref> ''[[Star Wars]]'',<ref>{{cite web |title=Box Office History for Star Wars Movies |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services, LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/StarWars.php |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref> ''[[Indiana Jones (seri)|Indiana Jones]]'',<ref>{{cite web |title=Indiana Jones – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=indianajones.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=[[Box Office Mojo]]}}</ref> ''[[Rocky (seri film)|Rocky]]'',<ref>{{Cite news |last=Anderson |first=Dave |date=November 16, 2003 |title=Bayonne Bleeder Throws a Punch at the Italian Stallion |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/16/sports/othersports/16ANDE.html |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Schneiderman |first=R. M. |date=August 10, 2006 |title=Stallone Settles With The 'Real' Rocky |work=[[Forbes]] |url=https://www.forbes.com/2006/08/10/rocky-stallone-settlement-cx_rs_0810autofacescan04.html |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Poller |first=Kenneth G. |date=November 12, 2003 |title=Charles Wepner v. Sylvester Stallone |publisher=Mango & Iacoviello |url=http://www.mandilaw.com/files/complaint.pdf |format=PDF |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref> ''[[Batman dalam film|Batman]]'',<ref>{{cite web |title=Batman – Worldwide (Unadjusted) & Batman: Mask of the Phantasm |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=batman.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=[[Box Office Mojo]]}}</ref> ''[[Jurassic Park]]'',<ref>{{cite web |title=Jurassic Park – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jurassicpark.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=[[Box Office Mojo]]}}</ref> dan ''[[Daftar film dan seri televisi Star Trek|Star Trek]]''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Box Office History for Star Trek Movies |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services, LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/StarTrek.php |accessdate=January 4, 2012}}</ref> Sejak pergantian abad ke-21, jumlahnya naik menjadi lebih dari 50 (tidak termasuk film top tunggal seperti ''Avatar'', ''Titanic'', dan ''Frozen'').<ref name="Numbers franchises">{{cite web |title=Movie Franchises |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services, LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/franchisesW.php |accessdate=September 19, 2017}}</ref> Ini dipicu oleh inflasi dan pertumbuhan pasar serta penerapan model [[seri media|berseri]] oleh Hollywood: film-film yang temanya sudah dikenal duluan oleh publik, misalnya diangkat dari karya sastra ternama atau tokoh yang sudah lengkap kisahnya. Metodologinya berlandaskan pandangan bahwa film-film yang berkaitan dengan sesuatu yang familier di mata publik akan lebih mudah dipasarkan. Karena itu, film-film seperti ini diberi julukan "''pre-sold''" (film yang sudah terjual duluan) oleh kalangan industri perfilman.<ref name="economist">{{Cite news |author=The Economist online |date=July 11, 2011 |title=Pottering on, and on |work=[[The Economist]] |url=https://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/07/film-franchises |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110711204558/https://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/07/film-franchises |archivedate=July 11, 2011}}</ref>
Baris 1.282 ⟶ 2.379:
* [[Daftar film berpenghasilan tertinggi]]
== Referensi ==
{{reflist}}
=== Sumber box office ===
{{reflist|group="#"|30em}}
=== {{note label|Sumber seri|§|§}}Sumber seri ===
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/ |accessdate=April 23, 2015 |title=Franchise Index |website=[[Box Office Mojo]] }}
* ''Avengers''
** {{cite web |title=Avengers – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=avengersfranchise.htm |accessdate=October 12, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Batman''
** {{cite web |title=Batman – Worldwide (Unadjusted) & Batman: Mask of the Phantasm |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=batman.htm |accessdate=July 26, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** Fathom events
*** Batman (UK): {{cite web |title=Batman (1989) 30th Anniversary |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batman30.htm |accessdate=May 25, 2019 |quote=UK: $48,482 }}
*** Batman Returns (UK): {{cite web |title=Batman Returns (Event) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batmanreturnsevent.htm |accessdate=May 25, 2019 |quote=UK: $10,057 }}
*** Batman Forever: {{cite web |title=Batman Forever (Fathom Event) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batmanforeverfathomevent.htm |accessdate=May 25, 2019 |quote=US: $38,014; UK: $373 }}
*** Batman and Robin: {{cite web |title=Batman and Robin (Fathom Event) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&id=batmanandrobinfathomevent.htm |accessdate=May 25, 2019 |quote=US: $28,597; UK: $196 }}
** {{cite news |title=Big Rental Pictures of 1966 |url=https://archive.org/details/sim_variety_1967-01-04_245_7/page/8 |work=[[Variety (
** {{cite web |title=Catwoman (2004) |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=catwoman.htm |accessdate=July 22, 2012 }}
** {{cite web |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Batman-Return-of-the-Caped-Crusaders#tab=summary |title=Batman: Return of the Caped Crusaders |website=[[The Numbers (website)|The Numbers]] |accessdate=December 17, 2016 }}
** {{cite web |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movie/Batman-and-Harley-Quinn#tab=summary |title=Batman and Harley Quinn (2017) |website=[[The Numbers (website)|The Numbers]] |accessdate=August 22, 2017 }}
* ''DC Extended Universe''
** {{cite web |title=DC Extended Universe – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=dc.htm |accessdate=May 8, 2019 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Despicable Me''
** {{cite web |title=Despicable Me (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=despicableme.htm |accessdate=November 4, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''The Fast and the Furious''
** {{cite web |title=The Fast and the Furious – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=fastandthefurious.htm |accessdate=April 22, 2017 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=The Fate of the Furious (2017-04-14) |website=[[Boxoffice (
* ''The Hunger Games''
** {{cite web |title=The Hunger Games – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=hungergames.htm |accessdate=March 31, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Ice Age''
** {{cite web |title=Ice Age – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=iceage.htm |accessdate=January 10, 2017 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=Ice Age: The Meltdown 3D (2014) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?page=&country=CH&wk=2014W44&id=_fICEAGETHEMELTDOW01 |accessdate=November 23, 2014 |website=Box Office Mojo |quote=Foreign Total: $6,095,750 }}
* ''Iron Man''
** {{cite web |title=Iron Man – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=ironmanfranchise.htm |accessdate=December 14, 2013 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''J.K. Rowling's Wizarding World''
** {{cite web |title=J.K. Rowling's Wizarding World – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jkrowling.htm |accessdate=November 17, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''James Bond''
** {{cite web |title=James Bond – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jamesbond.htm |accessdate=April 17, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo }} (Brosnan and Craig)
** {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA428#v=twopage 428–429]}}. "James Bond Franchise Films: All-Release Worldwide Box Office." (Connery, Lazenby, Moore and Dalton)
** {{cite web |title=Never Say Never Again (1983) |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services, LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1983/0NSNA.php |accessdate=November 25, 2012 }}
** {{cite web |title=Casino Royale (1967) |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services, LLC |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1967/0CARO.php |accessdate=January 6, 2012 }}
** {{cite web |title=Casino Royale (Secret Cinema 2019) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=UK&id=casinoroyale2019.htm |accessdate=June 16, 2019 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Jurassic Park''
** {{cite web |title=Jurassic Park – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=jurassicpark.htm |accessdate=November 25, 2018 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=Jurassic Park (2011 re-release) |url=http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fJURASSICPARK201&country=UK&wk=2011W38&id=_fJURASSICPARK201 |accessdate=January 17, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo |quote=United Kingdom: $786,021 }}
* ''Madagascar''
** {{cite web |title=Madagascar – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=madagascar.htm |accessdate=May 15, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Marvel Cinematic Universe''
** {{cite web |title=Marvel Cinematic Universe – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=avengers.htm |accessdate=June 19, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Middle-earth''
** {{cite web |title=Middle Earth – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=middleearth.htm |accessdate=November 18, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING03 |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2017 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |accessdate=February 6, 2017 }}
** {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING04 |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2017 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |accessdate=February 6, 2017 }}
** {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/intl/?id=_fTHELORDOFTHERING05 |title=The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2017 re-release) |website=Box Office Mojo |accessdate=February 6, 2017 }}
** {{cite web |title=The Lord of the Rings – Worldwide (Unadjusted) & The Lord of the Rings (1978) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=lordoftherings.htm |accessdate=April 23, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Mission: Impossible''
** {{cite web |title=Mission: Impossible – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=missionimpossible.htm |accessdate=November 4, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Pirates of the Caribbean''
** {{cite web |title=Pirates of the Caribbean – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=piratesofthecaribbean.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Shrek''
** {{cite web |title=Shrek – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=shrek.htm |accessdate=December 14, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Spider-Man''
** {{cite web |title=Spider-Man – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=spiderman.htm |accessdate=December 15, 2014 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=Spider-Man / Men in Black II |website=Box Office Mojo |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=spidermeninblack.htm |accessdate=May 31, 2018 }}
* ''Star Trek''
** {{cite web |title=Box Office History for Star Trek Movies |website=The Numbers |publisher=Nash Information Services |url=http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/series/StarTrek.php |accessdate=October 16, 2016 }}
* ''Star Wars''
** {{cite web |title=Star Wars (1977) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars4.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=The Empire Strikes Back |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=00&id=starwars5.htm |accessdate=October 8, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=Return of the Jedi |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars6.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=The Phantom Menace |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars.htm |accessdate=November 25, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=Attack of the Clones |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars2.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=Revenge of the Sith |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwars3.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=The Clone Wars |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=starwarsclonewars.htm |accessdate=January 6, 2012 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** Disney releases (2015–present): {{cite web |title=Star Wars – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=starwars.htm |accessdate=October 9, 2018 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''Superman''
** ''Superman'', ''Superman Returns'', ''Man of Steel'' and ''Batman v Superman'':
*** {{cite web |title=Superman – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=superman.htm |accessdate=May 15, 2016 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** ''Superman II'', ''Superman III'' and ''Superman IV'':
*** {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=534}}. "Superman Franchise Films: All-Release Worldwide Box Office Revenues vs. Production Costs – Equivalent 2005 $s."
*** {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=xii}}. "Notes on Adjusting Dollars and Making Estimates – Adjusting Revenues."
*** {{cite web |title=Adjusting for Ticket Price Inflation |format=Source: MPAA |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/about/adjuster.htm |accessdate=July 7, 2013 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |title=Supergirl (1984) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=supergirl.htm |accessdate=July 7, 2013 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web
* ''Toy Story''
** {{cite web|title=Toy Story – Worldwide (Unadjusted)|url=https://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=toystory.htm|accessdate=June 27, 2019|website=Box Office Mojo}}
* ''Transformers''
** {{cite web |title=Transformers – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=transformers.htm |accessdate=May 17, 2015 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''The Twilight Saga''
** {{cite web |title=Twilight – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=twilight.htm |accessdate=May 1, 2013 |website=Box Office Mojo }}
** {{cite web |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=twilightnewmooncombo.htm |accessdate=September 25, 2011 |title=Twilight/New Moon Combo (one-night-only) |website=Box Office Mojo }}
* ''X-Men''
** {{cite web |title=X-Men – Worldwide (Unadjusted) |url=http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=xmen.htm |accessdate=March 12, 2017 |website=Box Office Mojo |archive-date=2005-12-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051202182945/http://www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=xmen.htm |dead-url=yes }}
{{Refend}}
=== Daftar pustaka ===
{{Refbegin}}
* {{cite book |editor1-last=Block|editor1-first=Alex Ben|editor2-last=Wilson|editor2-first=Lucy Autrey |year=2010 |title=George Lucas's Blockbusting: A Decade-by-Decade Survey of Timeless Movies Including Untold Secrets of Their Financial and Cultural Success |publisher=[[HarperCollins]] |isbn=9780061778896 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last=Finler |first=Joel Waldo |year=2003 |title=The Hollywood Story |url=https://archive.org/details/hollywoodstory0000finl |publisher=Wallflower Press |isbn=978-1-903364-66-6 |ref=harv}}
* {{cite book |last1=Hall |first1=Sheldon |last2=Neale |first2=Stephen |year=2010 |title=Epics, Spectacles, and Blockbusters: A Hollywood History |url=https://archive.org/details/epicsspectaclesb0000hall |publisher=[[Wayne State University Press]] |isbn=978-0-8143-3008-1 |ref=harv}}
{{Refend}}
== Pranala luar ==
* [http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ All Time Worldwide Box Office Grosses] at [[Box Office Mojo]]
* [https://www.the-numbers.com/box-office-records/worldwide/all-movies/cumulative/all-time All Time Highest Grossing Movies Worldwide] at [[The Numbers (website)|The Numbers]]
Baris 1.395 ⟶ 2.492:
{{DEFAULTSORT:Film berpenghasilan tertinggi}}
[[
[[
| |||