Daftar film terlaris: Perbedaan antara revisi
Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
Baris 515:
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|50000000}}–{{nts|100000000}}<br />{{nts|prefix=$|20000000}}+{{ref |Rentals|R}} ({{nts|prefix=$|5200000}}){{ref |Rentals|R}}
| align="right" |{{nts|prefix=$|110000}}
| style="text-align:center;" |<ref group="#">{{cite book |last=Monaco |first=James |title=How to Read a Film:Movies, Media, and Beyond |publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] |year=2009 |isbn=9780199755790 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bgbOsjnppAcC&pg=PA262 262] |quote=The Birth of a Nation, costing an unprecedented and, many believed, thoroughly foolhardy $110,000, eventually returned $20 million and more. The actual figure is hard to calculate because the film was distributed on a "states' rights" basis in which licenses to show the film were sold outright. The actual cash generated by The Birth of a Nation may have been as much as $50 million to $100 million, an almost inconceivable amount for such an early film.}}</ref><ref name="Wasko" group="#">{{cite book |last=Wasko |first=Janet |chapter=D.W. Griffiths and the banks: a case study in film financing |editor-last=Kerr |editor-first=Paul |title=The Hollywood Film Industry: A Reader |publisher=[[Routledge]] |year=1986 |isbn=9780710097309 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jMINAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA34 34] |quote=Various accounts have cited $15 to $18 million profits during the first few years of release, while in a letter to a potential investor in the proposed sound version, Aitken noted that a $15 to $18 million box-office gross was a 'conservative estimate'. For years ''Variety'' has listed ''The Birth of a Nation''{{'}}s total rental at $50 million. (This reflects the total amount paid to the distributor, not box-office gross.) This 'trade legend' has finally been acknowledged by ''Variety'' as a 'whopper myth', and the amount has been revised to $5 million. That figure seems far more feasible, as reports of earnings in the Griffith collection list gross receipts for 1915–1919 at slightly more than $5.2 million (including foreign distribution) and total earnings after deducting general office expenses, but not royalties, at about $2 million.}}</ref><ref group="#">{{cite book |editor-last=Lang |editor-first=Robert |title=The Birth of a nation: D.W. Griffith, director |publisher=[[Rutgers University Press]] |year=1994 |isbn=978-0-8135-2027-8 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rKOgVk13vawC&pg=PA30 30] |quote=The film eventually cost $110,000 and was twelve reels long.}}</ref>
|-
! scope="row" | [[1916 dalam film|1916]]
Baris 1.565:
{{note label|Snow White|S7||Penghasilan kumulatif global sebesar $418 juta yang diterima ''Snow White'' tidak mencakup penghasilan di luar Amerika Utara sejak 1987 sampai seterusnya.}}
{{note label|GWTW|GW||Penghasilan ''Gone with the Wind'' dari penayangan perdananya tidak bisa dipastikan. Rata-rata catatan masa itu mencantumkan hasil sewa $32 juta di Amerika Utara. Catatan modern mengulang klaim tersebut; namun, angka tersebut bisa jadi angka hasil sewa global. Catatan dagang mengolah data dengan mendapatkannya dari distributor yang ingin memasarkan film sukses atau menyurvei bioskop dan membuat perkiraan. Distributor biasanya melaporkan harga sewa global karena angka yang lebih tinggi membuat film ini seolah sukses, sedangkan perkiraan hanya terbatas pada penghasilan di Amerika Utara; karena itu, sudah biasa apabila hasil sewa global dan Amerika Utara bercampur. Pada awal Perang Dunia II, banyak pasar asing tertutup bagi Hollywood sehingga industri perfilman mulai melaporkan penghasilan box office Amerika Utara saja.<ref name=HallNeale6>{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|pp=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA6 6]–[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ro0hASPfC68C&pg=PA7 7]}}. "For similar reasons of accountability, ''Variety'' has typically used figures for domestic (U.S. and Canadian) rather than worldwide revenue. This became its standard policy in 1940, when the advent of war in Europe persuaded the American film industry (temporarily, as it turned out) that it should be wholly reliant on the home market for profitability. Where specific rentals data are reported in ''Variety'' before this (which tended to be only sporadically) they were often for worldwide rather domestic performance. This was also the case with other trade sources, such as ''Quigley''{{'}}s annual ''Motion Picture Almanac'', which published its own all-time hits lists from the early 1930s onward. The subsequent confusion of domestic and worldwide figures, and of rental and box-office figures, has plagued many published accounts of Hollywood history (sometimes including those in ''Variety'' itself), and we have attempted to be diligant in clarifying the differences between them."</ref> Sesuai pendekatan baru ini, harga sewa ''Gone with the Wind'' di Amerika Utara direvisi menjadi $21 juta tahun 1947 ($11 juta lebih sedikit daripada angka sebelumnya),<ref>{{cite news |last=Shearer |first=Lloyd |title=GWTW: Supercolossal Saga of an Epic |date=October 26, 1947 |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/movies/bestpictures/wind-ar6.html |accessdate=July 14, 2012}}</ref> dan pada 1953—usai penayangan ulang 1947—''Variety'' melaporkan penghasilan $26 juta.<ref>{{cite news |title=Cinema: The Big Grossers |date=February 2, 1953 |work=[[Time (magazine)|Time]] |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,817905,00.html |accessdate=September 15, 2012}}</ref> Pada 1956, MGM melaporkan penghasilan kumulatif Amerika Utara sebesar $30.015.000 dan penghasilan luar negeri sebesar $18.964.000 dari tiga film.<ref name=BlockWilson129>{{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA129&q=%22Gone%20with%20the%20Wind%20includes%20initial%20release%20plus%20four%20rereleases%20(1941%2C1942%2C1947%20and%201954)%20since%20foreign%20rental%20revenues%20were%20available%20only%20cumulative%20through%201956.%22 129]}}. "Domestic Rentals: $30,015,000 (61%); Foreign Rentals: $18,964,000 (39%)...Gone with the Wind includes initial release plus four rereleases (1941,1942,1947 and 1954) since foreign rental revenues were available only cumulative through 1956."</ref> Hasil sewa global senilai $32 juta dari penayangan perdananya cocok dengan angka yang direvisi dan angka global yang dilaporkan: angka-angka ini menunjukkan bahwa film ini meraup $21 juta di Amerika Utara dan $11 juta di luar negeri lewat penayangan perdana, ditambah $9 juta di Amerika Utara dan $8 juta di luar negeri lewat serangkaian penayangan ulang hingga tahun 1956.}}
{{note label|Mom and Dad|MD||''Mom and Dad'' umumnya tidak masuk daftar 'film berpenghasilan tinggi' seperti daftarnya ''Variety'' karena distribusinya independen. Film ini pada dasarnya tergolong [[film eksploitasi]] dan dipasarkan seabgai [[film panduan sosial|film pendidikan seks]] untuk mengakali [[penyensoran film|sensor film]]. Karena berselisih dengan [[Motion Picture Production Code]], ''Mom and Dad'' dilarang beredar besar-besaran dan dibatasi untuk tayang di bioskop independen dan [[bioskop mobil]]. Ini adalah film tersukses di genrenya dan masih beredar hingga 1970-an ketika [[pornografi radikal]] mulai berkembang. Pada penghujung 1947, film ini meraup $2 juta. Tahun 1949, $8 juta. Tahun 1956, film ini mendapat $22 juta dari hasil sewa dengan penghasilan kotor $80 juta dan seharusnya bisa masuk sepuluh film tersukses pada akhir 1940-an dan awal 1950-an. Penghasilan totalnya diperkirakan mencapai $100 juta.}}
{{note label|Unconquered|UN||Chopra-Gant menyatakan bahwa angka ''Unconquered'' adalah penghasilan box office Amerika Utara, tetapi tabel yang mereka gunakan tidak memisahkan penghasilan kotor global dan Amerika Utara. Sumber lain menyatakan bahwa angka ''Forever Amber'' ($8 juta) dan ''Life with Father'' ($6,5 juta)<ref>{{citation |last=McDermott |first=Christine |title=Life with Father |year=2010 |page=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=vpbuSXSSqdkC&pg=PA307 307] |quote=No matter what the billing, the movie became a worldwide hit with $6.5 million in worldwide rentals, from Pappa och vi in Sweden to Vita col padre in Italy, although it booked a net loss of $350,000.}} In: {{harvnb|Block|Wilson|2010}}.</ref> sebenarnya merupakan penghasilan kotor sewa global. Jadi, angka ''Unconquered'' bisa jadi berarti itu.}}
{{note label|Cinerama|CI||Angka [[Cinerama]] mencerminkan penghasilan kotor. Karena Cinerama memiliki bioskop, tidak ada harga sewa untuk film. Artinya, studio menerima 100% penghasilan kotor box office, berbeda dengan rata-rata film lain yang pendapatan distributornya tidak sampai separuh penghasilan kotor. Karena ''Variety'' waktu itu memeringkatkan film berdasarkan hasil sewa AS, mereka membuat perkiraan hasil sewa untuk film-film Cinerama supaya bisa dibandingkan dengan film-film lain di tabel mereka. Dalam ''This Is Cinerama'', penghasilan kotor global $50 juta diperbaiki menjadi penghasilan kotor sewa AS $12.5 juta; angka ini 25% dari jumlah yang dilaporkan Cinerama. Rumus ''Variety'' tampaknya memangkas separuh penghasilan kotor untuk mengetahui perkiraan AS, lalu memangkasnya lagi separuh untuk menyimulasikan harga sewa. Angka sewa ''Variety'' sering diulang, tetapi tidak ada dasarnya—angka ini dikarang-karang untuk keperluan analisis perbandingan.<ref>{{cite news |last=Mulligan |first=Hugh A. |work=[[The Register-Guard]] |location=Eugene, Oregon |title=Cinerama Pushing Ahead As Biggest Money-Maker |date=September 23, 1956 |page=[https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=GPRVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=YeIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6899,3861317 7B] }}</ref> Kelima film Cinerama secara keseluruhan meraup penghasilan box office global sebesar $120 juta.<ref>{{harvnb|Hall|Neale|2010|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=jhvrSwOOsRgC&pg=PA145 145]}}. "The commercial success of the five Cinerama travelogues, which earned an aggregate worldwide box-office gross of $120 million by 1962 (including $82 million in the United States and Canada), nevertheless demonstrated to the mainstream industry the market value of special screen formats."</ref>}}
{{note label|Greatest Show|GS||''Variety'' menyatakan hasil sewa global ''The Greatest Show on Earth'' sekitar $18,35 juta ($12,8 juta di antaranya berasal dari Amerika Serikat<ref name=Finler358>{{harvnb|Finler|2003|p=[https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rvVhEJmbfrsC&pg=PA358 358]}}</ref>) satu tahun usai dirilis. Namun, Birchard mencantumkan angka di atas $15 juta hingga 1962. Angka Birchard bisa jadi hasil sewa kotor Amerika Utara saja dan mencakup penghasilan dari penayangan ulang tahun 1954 dan 1960.}}
| |||