Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Perbedaan antara revisi

Konten dihapus Konten ditambahkan
k Bot: Penggantian teks otomatis (-Perancis +Prancis)
InternetArchiveBot (bicara | kontrib)
Rescuing 15 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5
 
(7 revisi perantara oleh 5 pengguna tidak ditampilkan)
Baris 13:
<!-- Information -->
name = Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel |
|image=[[file:1831 Schlesinger Philosoph Georg Friedrich Wilhelm Hegel anagoria.JPG|Potret oleh Jakob Schlesinger pada 1831|jmpl]]
|birth = [[27 Agustus]] [[1770]] ([[Stuttgart]], [[Jerman]]) |
death = [[14 November]] [[1831]] ([[Berlin]], [[Jerman]]) |
school_tradition = Pendiri [[Hegelianisme]] |
Baris 26 ⟶ 27:
 
== Kehidupan dan karya ==
Hegel dilahirkan di [[Stuttgart]] pada [[27 Agustus]] [[1770]]. Pada masa kecilnya, ia lahapbanyak membaca literatur, surat kabar, esai filsafat dan tulisan-tulisan tentang berbagai topik lainnya. Masa kanak-kanaknya yang rajin membaca sebagian disebabkan oleh ibunya yang luar biasa progresif yang aktif mengasuh perkembangan intelektual anak-anaknya. Keluarga Hegel adalah sebuah keluarga kelas menengah yang mapan di [[Stuttgart]]. Ayahnya seorang [[pegawai negeri]] dalam administrasi pemerintahan di [[Württemberg]]. Hegel adalah seorang anak yang sakit-sakitan dan hampir meninggal dunia karena [[cacar]] sebelum mencapai usia enam tahun. Hubungannya dengan kakak perempuannya, Christiane, sangat erat dan tetap akrab sepanjang hidupnya.
 
'''Filosofi dari Hegel'''
Baris 40 ⟶ 41:
3. Negara Integralistik
 
Dalam konsep negara integralistik, negara adalah kesatuan masyarakat yang tersusun secara integral. Masyarakat merupakan kesatuan organis yang tidak terpisah dan bergerak bersama kedalam satu tujuan tunggal yang hakiki. Dalam proses penemuan tujuan hakiki ini, pemimpin berperan sebagai kepala yang akan menuntun pergerakan dari unsur-unsur organis lainnya, sehingga tercipta keselarasan antara pimpinan dan rakyat.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://rumahfilsafat.com/2009/08/16/hegel-dan-dialektika/ |title=Salinan arsip |access-date=2017-10-17 |archive-date=2023-03-26 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230326082519/https://rumahfilsafat.com/2009/08/16/hegel-dan-dialektika/ |dead-url=no }}</ref>
 
== Metode Dialektika ==
Baris 47 ⟶ 48:
Pengingkaran adalah konsep pengertian pertama (pengiyaan) dilawan-artikan, sehingga muncul konsep pengertian kedua yang kosong, formal, tak tentu dan tak terbatas. Menurut Hegel, dalam konsep kedua, sesungguhnya tersimpan pengertian dari konsep yang pertama. Konsep pemikiran kedua ini juga diterangkan secara radikal agar kehilangan ketegasan dan mencair.
Kontradiksi merupakan motor dialektika (jalan menuju kebenaran) maka kontradiksi harus mampu membuat konsep yang bertahan dan saling mengevaluasi. Kesatuan kontradiksi menjadi alat untuk melengkapi dua konsep pengertian yang saling berlawanan agar tercipta konsep baru yang lebih ideal.
 
<!--He received his education at the [[Tübinger Stift]] (seminary of the [[Protestant Church]] in Württemberg), where he met the future philosopher [[Friedrich Schelling]] and the poet [[Friedrich Hölderlin]]. Sharing a dislike for what was regarded as the restrictive environment of the [[Tübingen]] seminary, the three became close friends and mutually influenced each other's ideas. The three watched the unfolding of the [[French Revolution]] and immersed themselves in the emerging criticism of the [[idealist]] philosophy of [[Immanuel Kant]]. To be more precise, Hölderlin and Schelling immersed themselves in theoretical debates on Kantian philosophy; Hegel's interest in theory came later, after his own abortive attempts to work out a Kant-inspired popular philosophy — which was his original ambition. The Popularphilosophen were writers who introduced and debated issues of the day, as a way of promoting the values of the Enlightenment. Most of them were influenced by English or Scottish thinkers such as [[Locke]] or [[Thomas Reid|Reid]]; Hegel wanted to "complete" the critical philosophy of Kant in the mode of a Popularphilosoph. At Tübingen he was skeptical of the highly theoretical (and technical) discussions that Hölderlin and Schelling engaged in. It was only in 1800 that Hegel admitted the need to resolve the difficulties of the Kantian system before it could hope to be put into practice.
Baris 60:
 
==Teachings==
The obscure writings of [[Jakob Böhme]] had a strong effect on Hegel. Böhme had written that [[the Fall of Man]] was a necessary stage in the [[evolution]] of the [[universe]]. This evolution was, itself, the result of [[God]]'s desire for complete self-awareness. Hegel was fascinated by the works of [[Baruch Spinoza|Spinoza]], [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]], [[Jean-Jacques Rousseau|Rousseau]], and [[Johann Wolfgang von Goethe|Goethe]], and by the [[French Revolution]]. Modern philosophy, culture, and society seemed to Hegel fraught with contradictions and tensions, such as those between the subject and object of [[knowledge]], mind and nature, [[Self (philosophy)|self]] and [[Other]], freedom and authority, knowledge and faith, the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] and [[Romanticism]]. Hegel's main philosophical project was to take these contradictions and tensions and interpret them as part of a comprehensive, evolving, rational unity that, in different contexts, he called "the absolute idea" or "absolute knowledge".
 
According to Hegel, the main characteristic of this unity was that it evolved through and manifested itself in [[contradiction]] and [[negation]]. Contradiction and negation have a dynamic quality that at every point in each domain of [[reality]]—[[consciousness]], [[history]], [[philosophy]], [[art]], [[nature]], [[society]]—leads to further development until a [[rationality|rational]] unity is reached that preserves the contradictions as phases and sub-parts by lifting them up ([[Aufhebung]]) to a higher unity. This whole is [[mind|mental]] because it is [[mind]] that can comprehend all of these phases and sub-parts as steps in its own process of comprehension. It is rational because the same, underlying, [[logic]]al, developmental order underlies every domain of reality and is ultimately the order of self-conscious rational thought, although only in the later stages of development does it come to full self-consciousness. The rational, self-conscious [[whole]] is not a thing or [[being]] that lies outside of other existing things or minds. Rather, it comes to completion only in the philosophical comprehension of individual existing human minds who, through their own understanding, bring this developmental process to an understanding of itself.
 
(Note: “Mind” and “Spirit” are the common English translations of Hegel’s use of the German “[[Geist]]”. Some Hegelian scholars have argued that either of these terms overly “psychologize” Hegel,{{Fact|date=February 2007}} implying a kind of disembodied, solipsistic consciousness like "ghost" or "soul,". Geist combines the meaning of spirit, as in god, ghost or mind, with an intentional force. {{Fact|date=February 2007}})
Baris 80:
 
===Left and Right Hegelianism===
Another confusing aspect about the interpretation of Hegel's work is the fact that past historians have spoken of Hegel's influence as represented by two opposing camps. The [[Right Hegelians]], the allegedly direct disciples of Hegel at the Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität (now known as the [[Humboldt University of Berlin|Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin]]), advocated a Protestant orthodoxy and the political conservatism of the post-[[Napoleon I of France|Napoleon]] Restoration period. The [[Young Hegelians|Left Hegelians]], also known as the Young Hegelians, interpreted Hegel in a revolutionary sense, leading to an advocation of [[atheism]] in religion and [[liberal democracy]] in politics.
 
In more recent studies, however, this old paradigm has been questioned. For one thing, no Hegelians of the period ever referred to themselves as Right Hegelians. That was a term of insult that [[David Strauss]] (a self-styled Left Hegelian) hurled at [[Bruno Bauer]] (who has most often been classified by historians as a Left Hegelian, but who rejected both titles for himself). For another thing, no so-called "Left Hegelian" described himself as a follower of Hegel. This includes [[Moses Hess]] as well as [[Karl Marx]]. Several "Left Hegelians" openly repudiated or insulted the legacy of Hegel's philosophy. The critiques of Hegel offered from the "Left Hegelians" radically diverted Hegel's thinking into new directions—and form a disproportionately large part of the literature on and about Hegel.
Baris 86:
Perhaps the main reason that so much writing about Hegel emerges from the so-called Left-Hegelians is that the Left-Hegelians spawned [[Marxism]], which inspired a global movement lasting more than 150 years, encompassing the Russian Revolution, the Chinese Revolution and even more national-liberation movements of the 20th century. Yet that isn't, to be precise, any direct result of Hegel's philosophy.
 
20th century interpretations of Hegel were mostly shaped by one-sided schools of thought: [[British idealism|British Idealism]], [[logical positivism]], [[Marxism]], [[Fascism]] and [[postmodernism]]. However, since the fall of the [[USSR]], a new wave of Hegel scholarship arose in the West, without the preconceptions of the prior schools of thought.
 
[[Walter Jaeschke]] and [[Otto Pöggeler]] in Germany, as well as [[Peter Hodgson]] and [[Howard Kainz]] in America, are notable for their many contributions to post-USSR thinking about Hegel as published by the Hegel Society of America. Perhaps the most challenging publication from that source has been the new English edition of Hegel's ''Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion (1818-1831)'' which has challenged most 20th century views about Hegel.
Baris 98:
 
===Detractors===
Hegel used his system of dialectics to explain the whole of the history of [[philosophy]], [[science]], [[art]], [[politics]] and [[religion]], but he has had many critics over the centuries.
 
Perhaps the most famous critics were the Left-Hegelians, including [[Ludwig Feuerbach]], [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]] and their followers in the 19th century.
 
[[Arthur Schopenhauer]] despised Hegel on account of the latter's alleged [[historicism]] (among other reasons), and decried Hegel's work as [[Obscurantism|obscurantist]] "[[pseudo-philosophy]]". [[Schopenhauer]], once a colleague of Hegel's at the University of Berlin said: "''The height of audacity in serving up pure nonsense, in stringing together senseless and extravagant mazes of words, such as had been only previously known in madhouses, was finally reached in Hegel, and became the instrument of the most barefaced, general mystification that has ever taken place, with a result which will appear fabulous to posterity, as a monument to German stupidity."'' Such a judgment is the result of Hegel's repudiation, in his book ''[[Science of Logic]]'', of each [[law of thought]] that is the normal basis of rational thinking and discourse.
 
Actually, Hegel had the most well-attended classes of any philosopher of his time. The belief that Hegel once said, "Only one man understands me, and even he does not" (Strathern, 1997), is incorrect, since it was actually stated by [[Fichte]] about [[Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling]] when Hegel persuaded Schelling to abandon his teacher [[Fichte]].
Baris 119:
 
===Advocates===
In the latter half of the 20th century, Hegel's philosophy underwent a major renaissance. This was due to: (a) the rediscovery and reevaluation of Hegel as a possible philosophical progenitor of Marxism by philosophically oriented Marxists; (b) a resurgence of the historical perspective that Hegel brought to everything; and (c) an increasing recognition of the importance of his [[dialectical method]].
 
The book that did the most to reintroduce Hegel into the Marxist canon was perhaps [[Georg Lukács]]' ''History and Class Consciousness''. This sparked a renewed interest in Hegel reflected in the work of [[Herbert Marcuse]], [[Theodor Adorno]], [[Ernst Bloch]], [[Raya Dunayevskaya]], [[Alexandre Kojève]] and [[Gotthard Günther]] among others. The Hegel renaissance also highlighted the significance of Hegel's early works, i.e. those published prior to the ''[[Phenomenology of Spirit]]''. The direct and indirect influence of Kojève's lectures and writings (on the Phenomenology of Spirit, in particular) mean that it is not possible to understand most French philosophers from [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] to [[Jacques Derrida]] without understanding Hegel.
 
Beginning in the 1960s, Anglo-American Hegel scholarship has attempted to challenge the traditional interpretation of Hegel as offering a metaphysical system: this has also been the approach of [[Z.A.Pelczynski]] and [[Shlomo Avineri]]. This view, sometimes referred to as the 'non-metaphysical option', has had a decided influence on many major English language studies of Hegel in the past 40 years.
 
U.S. [[neoconservative]] [[political science|political theorist]] [[Francis Fukuyama]]'s controversial book ''[[The End of History and the Last Man]]'' was heavily influenced by Alexandre Kojève. Among modern scientists, the physicist [[David Bohm]], the mathematician [[William Lawvere]], the logician [[Kurt Gödel]] and the biologist [[Ernst Mayr]] have been interested in Hegel's philosophical work.
 
A late 20th century literature in Western Theology that is friendly to Hegel includes such writers as Dale M. Schlitt (1984), Theodore Geraets (1985), Philip M. Merklinger (1991), Stephen Rocker (1995) and Cyril O'Regan (1995). The contemporary theologian [[Hans Küng]] has also advanced contemporary scholarship in Hegel studies.
 
Recently, two prominent American philosophers, [[John McDowell]] and [[Robert Brandom]] (sometimes, half-seriously, referred to as the [[University of Pittsburgh|Pittsburgh]] Hegelians), have produced philosophical works exhibiting a marked Hegelian influence.
 
Beginning in the 1990s, after the fall of the [[USSR]], a fresh reading of Hegel took place in the West. For these scholars, fairly well represented by the Hegel Society of America and in cooperation with German scholars such as [[Otto Poeggeler]] and [[Walter Jaeschke]], Hegel's works should be read without preconceptions. Marx plays a minor role in these new readings, and some contemporary scholars have suggested that Marx's interpretation of Hegel is irrelevant to a proper reading of Hegel. Some American philosophers associated with this movement include Clark Butler, Daniel Shannon, David Duquette, David MacGregor, Donald Burke, Edward Beach, John Burbidge, Lawrence Stepelevich, Rudolph Siebert, Theodore Geraets and William Desmond.
Baris 163:
* [[Martin Heidegger]], 1988. ''Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit''. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 0-253-32766-0
* [[Jean Hyppolite]], 1979. ''Genesis and Structure of "Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit."'' Northwestern University Press. ISBN 0-8101-0594-2
* Kadvany, John, 2001, ''[http://www.johnkadvany.com Imre Lakatos and the Guises of Reason] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050426031841/http://www.johnkadvany.com/ |date=2005-04-26 }}''. Duke University Press. ISBN 0-8223-2659-0
* Kainz, Howard P., 1996, ''G. W. F. Hegel''. Ohio University Press. ISBN 0-8214-1231-0.
* Kainz, Howard P.,1994, ''Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit: Selections Terjemahan dan anotasi oleh Howard P. Kainz''. The Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0-271-01076-2.
Baris 189:
{{Commons|Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel}}
{{wikisource author}}
* [http://wiki.hegel.net HegelWiki yang baru] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081010195158/http://wiki.hegel.net/ |date=2008-10-10 }}
* [http://hegel.net/en/hegelbio.htm Biografi Hegel yang sangat baik dengan gambar-gambar] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060616190313/http://hegel.net/en/hegelbio.htm |date=2006-06-16 }}
* [http://hegel.net Hegel.net] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041016073814/http://www.hegel.net/res/ml.htm |date=2004-10-16 }} - sumber-sumber tersedia dalam GNU FDL
* [http://wiki.hegel.net/index.php/Hegel Hegel.net] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080503043546/http://wiki.hegel.net/index.php/Hegel |date=2008-05-03 }} - Artikel wiki tentang Hegel
* [http://www.aliciafarinati.com.ar Alicia Farinati - Karya-karya Hegelian] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130903024326/http://www.aliciafarinati.com.ar/ |date=2013-09-03 }} Beberapa artikel tentang Hegel. Terdapat dalam bahasa Inggris, Spanyol, dan Prancis
* [http://hegel.net/en/links.htm Daftar pranala berkomentar] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230127115713/https://hegel.net/en/links.htm |date=2023-01-27 }}
* [http://hegel.net/en/ml.htm Milis Hegel di internet] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220705214308/https://hegel.net/en/ml.htm |date=2022-07-05 }}
* [http://hegel-system.de/en/ Penjelasan tentang Hegel], kebanyakan dalam bahasa Jerman
* [http://www.kat.gr/kat/history/Mod/Th/Hegelianism.htm Diskusi tentang tradisi Hegelian, termasuk skisma Kiri dan Kanan] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050427011253/http://www.kat.gr/kat/history/Mod/Th/Hegelianism.htm |date=2005-04-27 }}
* [http://www.hegel.org/ The Hegel Society of America] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060815193254/http://www.hegel.org/ |date=2006-08-15 }}
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel/ Hegel dalam Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190430071107/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hegel/ |date=2019-04-30 }}
* http://www.gwfhegel.org/ {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323135507/https://www.gwfhegel.org./ |date=2021-03-23 }}
* http://www.gwfhegel.org/
* [http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/hegel.html Hegel page in 'The History Guide'] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210226042830/http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/hegel.html |date=2021-02-26 }}
* [http://millinerd.com/2006/05/is-hegel-christian.html Is Hegel a Christian?] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080523200628/http://millinerd.com/2006/05/is-hegel-christian.html |date=2008-05-23 }}
* [http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/index Rethinking the Place of Philosophy with Hegel - Call for Papers for Cosmos and History]<br {{Webarchive|url=https:/>/web.archive.org/web/20080414210012/http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/index |date=2008-04-14 }}
 
=== Teks Hegel online ===
 
* {{gutenberg author|id=Georg+Wilhelm+Friedrich+Hegel |name=Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel}}
* [http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20-%20Philosophy%20of%20History.htm Pengantar Filsafat Sejarah] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060822172653/http://www.class.uidaho.edu/mickelsen/texts/Hegel%20-%20Philosophy%20of%20History.htm |date=2006-08-22 }}
* [http://libcom.org/library/philosophy-right-hegel Filsafat Hegel tentang Hak] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060619143332/http://libcom.org/library/philosophy-right-hegel |date=2006-06-19 }}
* [http://libcom.org/library/philosophy-history-hegel Filsafat Sejarah Hegel] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060619143411/http://libcom.org/library/philosophy-history-hegel |date=2006-06-19 }}
* [http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/index.htm Hegel by HyperText] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210211040648/https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/index.htm |date=2021-02-11 }}, arsip rujukan di [[Marxists.org]]
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich}}