Historiografi Kemalis
Historiografi Kemalis (bahasa Turki: Kemalist tarihyazımı) adalah sebuah penjelasan sejarah yang utamanya berdasarkan pada pidato enam hari yang disampaikan oleh Mustafa Kemal [Atatürk][a] pada tahun 1927,[1][2] dipromosikan oleh ideologi politik Kemalisme, dan dipengaruhi oleh kultus personalitas Atatürk.[3] Historiografi tersebut banyak ditolak oleh para cendekiawan, terutama oleh Taner Akçam, Erik-Jan Zürcher, Uğur Ümit Üngör dan Hans-Lukas Kieser.
Catatan kaki
sunting- ^ Ia menerima marga Atatürk sesuai dengan hukum marga tahun 1934.
Referensi
sunting- ^ Toni Alaranta (2008) Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s Six‐Day Speech of 1927: Defining the Official Historical View of the Foundation of the Turkish Republic, Turkish Studies, 9:1, 115-129, DOI: 10.1080/14683840701814042
- ^ Dogan, G. (2016). "The establishment of kemalist autocracy and its reform policies in turkey". Kansas State University. "Kemalist historiography, which is based on Mustafa Kemal’s six-day speech (Nutuk) in October 1927, emphasizes the foundation of the Republic as central to Turkish history."
- ^ Zürcher, E. J. (1992). The Qttoman Legacy of the Turkish Republic: An Attempt at a New Periodization. Die Welt Des Islams, 32(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/1570835 "Because of Atatürk's stature as saviour of his country and the growing personality cult which surrounded him, this version [of history] assumed the status of absolute truth."
Bacaan tambahan
sunting- Sönmez, Erdem (2020). "A past to be forgotten? Writing Ottoman history in early republican Turkey". British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies. 48 (4): 753–769. doi:10.1080/13530194.2020.1714428.
- The Ottoman Empire in the Historiography of the Kemalist Era: a Theory of Fatal Decline (Büşra Ersanli, page 115) The Ottomans and the Balkans: a discussion of historiography eds. Fikret Adanır and Suraiya Faroqhi
- Edhem Eldem (2018). "Sultan Abdülhamid II: Founding Father of the Turkish State?". Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association. 5 (2): 25. doi:10.2979/jottturstuass.5.2.05.
- Gurpinar, Dogan (2011). "Double Discourses and Romantic Nationalism: The Ottoman Empire as a 'Foreign Country'". Int. J. Turkish Studies (dalam bahasa Inggris). 17 (1–2).
- Akturk, Ahmet Serdar (2010). "Arabs in Kemalist Turkish Historiography". Middle Eastern Studies. 46 (5): 633–653. doi:10.1080/00263206.2010.504553.
- Eissenstat, Howard (2003). "History and Historiography: Politics and Memory in the Turkish Republic". Contemporary European History. 12 (1): 93–105. doi:10.1017/S096077730300105X. ISSN 0960-7773. JSTOR 20081142.
- Zürcher, Erik Jan (2014). "Monologue to Conversation: Comparative Approaches in Turkish Historiography". Turkish Studies. 15 (4): 589–599. doi:10.1080/14683849.2014.987906.
- Göçek, Fatma Müge (2007). "Turkish Historiography and the Unbearable Weight of 1915". The Armenían Genocíde Cultural and Ethical Legacies (dalam bahasa Inggris). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-13101-6.
- Ter-Matevosyan, Vahram (2019). "Problems of Definition and Historiography of Kemalism". Turkey, Kemalism and the Soviet Union: Problems of Modernization, Ideology and Interpretation (dalam bahasa Inggris). Springer International Publishing. hlm. 7–39. ISBN 978-3-319-97403-3.
- Göçek, Fatma Müge (2011). "Reading Genocide: Turkish Historiography on 1915". Dalam Suny, Ronald Grigor; Göçek, Fatma Müge; Naimark, Norman M. A Question of Genocide: Armenians and Turks at the End of the Ottoman Empire. Oxford University Press. hlm. 42–52. ISBN 978-0-19-979276-4.