Pembicaraan:Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki
Ini adalah halaman pembicaraan untuk diskusi terkait perbaikan pada artikel Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki. Halaman ini bukanlah sebuah forum untuk diskusi umum tentang subjek artikel. |
|||
| Kebijakan artikel
|
||
Cari sumber: "Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki" – berita · surat kabar · buku · cendekiawan · HighBeam · JSTOR · gambar bebas · sumber berita bebas · The Wikipedia Library · Referensi WP |
Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki adalah artikel pilihan; artikel ini (atau versi terdahulunya) telah dinilai sebagai salah satu artikel terbaik yang dihasilkan komunitas Wikipedia. Bila Anda dapat memutakhirkan isi artikel ini tanpa merusak tulisan yang telah ada, silakan menyuntingnya.
|
Pengeboman atom
sunting"Pengeboman atom" terdengar janggal karena kata dasarnya "bom atom"; bukan "atom"nya yang dibom tapi Hiroshima dan Nagasaki. Mungkin lebih tepat Pengebom-atoman Hiroshima dan Nagasaki. 11:22, 6 Agustus 2009 (UTC) Hubungi: Bennylin |
∧ ∧ (,,°Д°) |
- Usul, pindahkan ke "pengebomatoman". "Bom atom" merupakan satu kata benda (nomina) menurut KBBI, bukan dua. Idealnya, sirkumfiks pe- -an membentuk kata baru dengan menambahkan afiksasi di awal dan akhir kata benda, bukan menyusup di salah satu kata unsurnya. Cahyo Ramadhani curhat? 7 Agustus 2016 04.16 (UTC)
- Saya usul "Penjatuhan bom atom di Hiroshima dan Nagasaki" atau dikembalikan ke "Serangan bom atom di Hiroshima dan Nagasaki". — FarrasLa Poste 7 Agustus 2016 11.36 (UTC)
- Ya, itu alternatif yang oke punya kalau nggak pede dengan bentukan pengebomatoman (yang betul secara morfologi) yang masih asing. Dulu kayaknya sempet dinamai "Serangan bom atom di Hiroshima dan Nagasaki". Cahyo Ramadhani curhat? 7 Agustus 2016 11.43 (UTC)
@Bennylin: Maaf ngeping di thread lama. Saya setuju kalau "pengeboman atom" terdengar janggal, tapi bentuk "pengebomatoman" sepertinya juga tidak lazim. Saya lebih cenderung pada "penjatuhan bom atom" seperti usul Farras. Kalau tidak ada masalah akan saya pindahkan segera. — swarabakti💬 10 Agustus 2021 09.30 (UTC)
- Eh, setelah dilihat-lihat lagi, sepertinya istilah "serangan bom atom" lebih umum. Di Google Scholar kata kunci ini menghasilkan 67 hasil, vs 25 untuk "penjatuhan bom atom" dan 8 untuk "pengeboman atom"; kata kunci "pengebomatoman" tidak menampilkan hasil apapun. — swarabakti💬 10 Agustus 2021 09.36 (UTC)
- Siap. Dialihkan ke Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki. ꦱꦭꦩ꧀ ‑Bennylin 「obrol」 16 Agustus 2021 10.08 (WIB)
External links found that need fixing (Oktober 2023)
suntingHello fellow editors,
I have found one or more external links on Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:
- http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0310-08.htm is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-080128-037.pdf is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-080128-037.pdf is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67909 is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.
This notice will only be made once for these URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Melaporkan kesalahan) 16 Oktober 2023 06.57 (UTC)
External links found that need fixing (November 2023)
suntingHello fellow editors,
I have found one or more external links on Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:
- http://www.crispypasta.com/2016/12/scary-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-shadows-pict-creepypasta.html is found to be dead. Recommend adding https://web.archive.org/web/20231022211710/http://www.crispypasta.com/2016/12/scary-hiroshima-and-nagasaki-shadows-pict-creepypasta.html to the original URL.
- http://www.afhra.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=10517 is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.
This notice will only be made once for these URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Melaporkan kesalahan) 16 November 2023 12.27 (UTC)
Skeptikal
suntingApakah situs web crispypasta.com, yang kelihatannya seperti blog horor, pantas dijadikan referensi untuk artikel yang memiliki nilai sejarah aktual? Jika tidak, lantas apa alasannya menjadikan situs web tersebut menjadi referensi?
Tambahan edit: Dan, mengapa pula men-sitasi-kan situs web tersebut pada konten artikel ini yang tidak memiliki hubungan dengan isi situs web tersebut?
External links found that need fixing (November 2024)
suntingHello fellow editors,
I have found one or more external links on Serangan bom atom Hiroshima dan Nagasaki that are in need of attention. Please take a moment to review the links I found and correct them on the article if necessary. I found the following problems:
- http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/fulltext.php?fulltextid=15 is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=11&documentid=65&documentdate=1946-06-19&studycollectionid=abomb&groupid=%27%272. is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=42&documentid=65&documentdate=1946-06-19&studycollectionid=abomb&groupid=%27%27Effort is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=14&documentid=65&documentdate=1946-06-19&studycollectionid=abomb&groupid=%27%272. is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=12&documentid=65&documentdate=1946-06-19&studycollectionid=abomb&groupid=%27%272. is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.trumanlibrary.org/publicpapers/index.php?pid=100 is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
- http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/bomb/large/documents/index.php?pagenumber=19&documentid=65&documentdate=June%2019,%201946&studycollectionid=abomb&groupid=. is considered to be dead, however has been found to be alive. Recommend removing the dead flag from the URL.
When you have finished making the appropriate changes, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information to fix any issues with the URLs mentioned above.
This notice will only be made once for these URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Melaporkan kesalahan) 15 November 2024 06.24 (UTC)