{{-}}{{shortcut|WP:SPI|WP:SI|WP:RFCU|WP:SSP}}
Selamat datang di '''Investigasi pengguna siluman (SPI)''', sebuah forum untuk menginvestigasi kecurigaan adanya [[Wikipedia:Pengguna siluman|Pengguna siluman]] (penyalahgunaan beberapa akun Wikipedia). If you suspect socking, anda dapat membuka investigasi disini sehingga seorang pengurus dengan pengalaman dalam menangani pengguna siluman dapat membuat suatu keputusan mengenai apakah kecurigaan Anda benar. Investigasi hanya akan dibuka jika Anda memberikan, di halaman investigasi, bukti yang nyata bahwa dua pengguna mempunyai operator yang sama.
In addition to the administrator team, the [[Wikipedia:Pemeriksa|CheckUser]] team also uses this page to receive requests for CheckUser investigation into socking. Requests CheckUser attention to a case of possible sock-puppetry are submitted by opening an investigation in the normal way, but such requests may only be accepted (in accordance with the CheckUser and Privacy Policies) if clear evidence of socking is enclosed. Requests for CheckUser attention that do not provide sufficient evidence to support the suspicion of socking will be summarily declined. (This page is also used to receive [[#Quick Checkuser requests|Quick CheckUser requests]], which are of a somewhat different nature.)
This process is supported by the "SPI Clerks" Team, which provides clerical and administrative support relating to the closure of completed investigations, and the userpage-tagging of socks that are blocked as a result of an investigation.
{{TOC limit|limit=4}}
----
<big>'''Important notes'''</big>
----
* Before submitting a case, verify that there isn't one already in progress using the search button at the bottom of this page.
* Without exception, you must supply evidence (with [[Help:Diff|diffs]] and any reasonable deductions and impressions as a result) that substantiate your suspicion that two accounts are sock-puppets.
* Evidence is required for regular investigations, because they help the administrator to follow your thinking, and therefore make a determination more quickly. Administrators are not clairvoyants, nor will they be able to immediately notice the similarities between two accounts. Additionally, proper evidence is absolutely mandatory in investigations with a request for checkuser.
* Try to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] in relation to all but the most obvious socks.
* You can notify the suspected accounts by adding <code>{{tlsp|socksuspectnotice|PUPPETMASTER}} ~~~~</code> to the bottom of their talk pages.
* (Notification is not mandatory, and in some cases may be sub-optimal. Use your best judgement.)
* [[KISS principle|Keep it simple]]! Simple, concise evidence leads to a quickly resolved case.
----
<big>'''Whether or not to request a check?'''</big>
----
* CheckUser is a tool accessible to a small number of trusted users.
* These users ("CheckUsers") can use restricted data from Wikipedia's server logs to determine whether two accounts have the same operator.
* For most cases, a determination can be made [[WP:DUCK|based on the accounts' behaviour alone]], and CheckUser will not be needed.
* Requests for a check are granted only in certain circumstances, and are evaluated (and endorsed or not) in the first instance by an SPI Clerk.
* Even with a clerk endorsement, in all cases the decision to check is at the absolute discretion of the CheckUser who considers the case.
* Requests for a check must be supplied alongside evidence to substantiate the suspicion of sockpuppetry or abuse.
* Requests for a check that are not supplied with compelling diffs or sufficient evidence will be declined.
{{Wikipedia:Investigasi pengguna siluman/SPI/CheckUser criteria}}
----
<big>'''How to request a check'''</big>
----
Anyone (even users without an account) can request CheckUser on an open case if it is necessary. If you wish to request CheckUser in any existing open case, then edit the case, and at the top of the edit box change <code>{{SPI case status}}</code> to <code>{{SPI case status|curequest}}</code>. An SPI Clerk (or CheckUser) will review the case and determine if a check is needed. A clerk may either [[File:Symbol support2 vote.svg|17px]] '''Endorse''' the case for CheckUser attention or [[File:Symbol unsupport2 vote.svg|17px]] '''Decline to endorse'''.
If the case is declined, it will then be moved back onto the list of SPI cases in which a check is not requested—where it will be handled by a patrolling administrator. If the case is endorsed, then a CheckUser will determine whether a check is justified and review the case; the CheckUser will then run the check, or decline to run the check, at their discretion. The CheckUser may post their results under the "Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments" section, stating which accounts are: [[File:Artículo bueno.svg|17px]] '''Confirmed''' to be the same user; which ones are [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|17px]] '''Likely''', [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|17px]] '''Possible''', or [[File:Symbol unlikely.svg|17px]] '''Unlikely''' to have the same operator; which accounts are [[File:Symbol unrelated.svg|17px]] '''Unrelated'''. In some cases, a check may be [[File:Symbol unsupport vote.svg|17px]] '''Inconclusive'''.
----
<big>'''Quick CheckUser requests'''</big>
----
If you need a CheckUser to review something, but it does not fall into the above categories, please see '''[[#Quick Checkuser requests|here]]''' for instructions.
----
<big>'''Administrator's instructions'''</big>
----
For administrators: If you would like to assist at SPI, then please feel welcome, and thank you for contributing. We maintain a set of [[Wikipedia:Investigasi pengguna siluman/SPI/Administrators instructions|administrators' instructions]] for your reference. If you need help, please ask one of the [[Wikipedia:Investigasi pengguna siluman/SPI/Clerks#Active clerks|active SPI clerks]], or join [irc://irc.freenode.net/wikipedia-en-spi #wikipedia-en-spi] on [[Freenode]] IRC.
