A potential future for Add A Fact is to make a tool like this available to non-Wikipedians or new/casual contributors. This could increase the volume of contributions, but without careful guardrails, we know this risks become too noisy and/or abusive. Could opening up the ability to suggest new claims/references to more people be helpful to en.wiki? How could/should the workflow differ from what you see today in Add A Fact if the tool were geared toward a non-Wikipedian audience?
{{Bupati Bekasi}}
A potential future for Add A Fact is to make a tool like this available to non-Wikipedians or new/casual contributors. This could increase the volume of contributions, but without careful guardrails, we know this risks become too noisy and/or abusive. Could opening up the ability to suggest new claims/references to more people be helpful to en.wiki? How could/should the workflow differ from what you see today in Add A Fact if the tool were geared toward a non-Wikipedian audience?
A potential future for Add A Fact is to make a tool like this available to non-Wikipedians or new/casual contributors. This could increase the volume of contributions, but without careful guardrails, we know this risks become too noisy and/or abusive. Could opening up the ability to suggest new claims/references to more people be helpful to en.wiki? How could/should the workflow differ from what you see today in Add A Fact if the tool were geared toward a non-Wikipedian audience?
A potential future for Add A Fact is to make a tool like this available to non-Wikipedians or new/casual contributors. This could increase the volume of contributions, but without careful guardrails, we know this risks become too noisy and/or abusive. Could opening up the ability to suggest new claims/references to more people be helpful to en.wiki? How could/should the workflow differ from what you see today in Add A Fact if the tool were geared toward a non-Wikipedian audience?
A potential future for Add A Fact is to make a tool like this available to non-Wikipedians or new/casual contributors. This could increase the volume of contributions, but without careful guardrails, we know this risks become too noisy and/or abusive. Could opening up the ability to suggest new claims/references to more people be helpful to en.wiki? How could/should the workflow differ from what you see today in Add A Fact if the tool were geared toward a non-Wikipedian audience?
A potential future for Add A Fact is to make a tool like this available to non-Wikipedians or new/casual contributors. This could increase the volume of contributions, but without careful guardrails, we know this risks become too noisy and/or abusive. Could opening up the ability to suggest new claims/references to more people be helpful to en.wiki? How could/should the workflow differ from what you see today in Add A Fact if the tool were geared toward a non-Wikipedian audience?{{Bupati Bekasi}}
