Pengepungan Wina

Pengepungan Wina
	Bagian dari Peperangan Utsmaniyah-Habsburg
	; Penggambaran pertempuran di luar Wina, 1529.
Tanggal	27 September–15 Oktober 1529 (2 Minggu dan 4 hari)
Lokasi	Wina, Kekaisaran Romawi Suci(Masa Kini Wina,Austria)
Hasil	Utsmaniyah mundur.
Pihak terlibat
Kekaisaran Romawi Suci; • Kerajaan Bohemia; • Elektorat Palatinat; Imperium Spanyol	Kesultanan Utsmaniyah; Moldavia
Tokoh dan pemimpin
Nicholas, Bangsawan dari Salem; Philip, Adipati Palatinate-Neuburg; Wilhelm von Roggendorf	Suleiman I; Pargalı İbrahim Pasha
Kekuatan
c. 23.000	c. 120.000
Korban
Tidak diketahui	15.000 terluka, tewas, atau ditangkap

Pengepungan Wina tahun 1529 adalah upaya pertama Suleiman I dari Kesultanan Utsmaniyah untuk merebut kota Wina. Namun, usaha Utsmaniyah gagal, dan untuk pertama kalinya penaklukan Utsmaniyah di Eropa berhasil dihentikan. Sebelumnya, Utsmaniyah sudah berhasil mencaplok Kerajaan Hongaria dan mendirikan negara vasal di Transilvania setelah kemenangan besar dalam Pertempuran Mohács. Menurut Toynbee, "Kegagalan [pengepungan Wina] pertama berhasil menahan penaklukan Utsmaniyah."^[5]

Beberapa sejarawan mempertanyakan tujuan utama Suleiman. Ada yang meyakini ia ingin memperkuat kekuasaan Utsmaniyah di Hongaria. Keputusannya untuk menyerang Wina dipandang sebagai gerakan taktis setelah kemenangannya di Hongaria. Ahli lain menyatakan bahwa penaklukan Hongaria hanyalah pendahuluan untuk menginvasi Eropa.^[6]

Catatan kaki

^ ^a ^b Turnbull, Stephen. The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699. New York: Osprey, 2003. hal 51
^ Turnbull says the garrison was "over 16,000 strong". The Ottoman Empire, p 50; Keegan and Wheatcroft suggest 17,000. Who's Who in Military History, p 283; Some estimates are just above 20,000, for example: "Together with Wilhelm von Roggendorf, the Marshal of Austria, Salm conducted the defense of Vienna with 16,000 regulars and 5,000 militia." Dupuy, Trevor, et al., The Encyclopedia of Military Biography, p 653.
^ Turnbull suggests Suleiman had "perhaps 120,000" troops when he reached Osijek on 6 August. The Ottoman Empire, p 50; Christopher Duffy suggests "Suleiman led an army of 125,000 Turks". Siege Warfare: Fortresses in the Early Modern World 1494–1660, p 201. For higher estimates, see further note on Suleiman's troops.
^ Turnbull, Stephen. The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699. New York: Osprey, 2003. hal. 51
^ Toynbee, hal. 119
^ It was an "afterthought towards the end of a season of campaigning". Riley-Smith, hal 256; "A last minute decision following a quick victory in Hungary". Shaw and Shaw, p 94; Other historians, for example Stephen Turnbull, regard the suppression of Hungary as the calculated prologue to an invasion further into Europe: "John Szapolya [sic] became a footnote in the next great Turkish advance against Europe in the most ambitious campaign of the great Sultan's reign." Turnbull, hal 50.

Artikel bertopik sejarah ini adalah sebuah rintisan. Anda dapat membantu Wikipedia dengan mengembangkannya.

[Turnbull_2-1] Turnbull, Stephen. The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699. New York: Osprey, 2003. hal 51

[2] Turnbull says the garrison was "over 16,000 strong". The Ottoman Empire, p 50; Keegan and Wheatcroft suggest 17,000. Who's Who in Military History, p 283; Some estimates are just above 20,000, for example: "Together with Wilhelm von Roggendorf, the Marshal of Austria, Salm conducted the defense of Vienna with 16,000 regulars and 5,000 militia." Dupuy, Trevor, et al., The Encyclopedia of Military Biography, p 653.

[estimate-3] Turnbull suggests Suleiman had "perhaps 120,000" troops when he reached Osijek on 6 August. The Ottoman Empire, p 50; Christopher Duffy suggests "Suleiman led an army of 125,000 Turks". Siege Warfare: Fortresses in the Early Modern World 1494–1660, p 201. For higher estimates, see further note on Suleiman's troops.

[4] Turnbull, Stephen. The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699. New York: Osprey, 2003. hal. 51

[5] Toynbee, hal. 119

[6] It was an "afterthought towards the end of a season of campaigning". Riley-Smith, hal 256; "A last minute decision following a quick victory in Hungary". Shaw and Shaw, p 94; Other historians, for example Stephen Turnbull, regard the suppression of Hungary as the calculated prologue to an invasion further into Europe: "John Szapolya [sic] became a footnote in the next great Turkish advance against Europe in the most ambitious campaign of the great Sultan's reign." Turnbull, hal 50.

[5]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[6]