Wikipedia:Warung Kopi (Kebijakan)
| Warung Kopi - diskusi kebijakan kirim topik baru | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bagian kebijakan dari Warung Kopi ini digunakan untuk membicarakan mengenai kebijakan dan pedoman yang sudah diterapkan di Wikipedia; atau diskusi mengenai proposal-proposal yang baru diajukan. Bacaan penting: | |||||||||||||
Ingat beri tanda tangan dan tanggal pada akhir pesan Anda dengan cara mengetikkan | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Diskusi:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Overview #2 of updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process
Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.
As we mentioned last month, the Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve.
Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Each month, we are sending overviews of these updates to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.
Here is a overview of the updates that have been sent since our message last month:
- Update 7 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (16 February 2017)
- Development of documentation for Tracks A & B
- Update 8 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (24 February 2017)
- Introduction of Track Leads for all four audience tracks
- Update 9 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (2 March 2017)
- Seeking feedback on documents being used to help facilitate upcoming community discussions
More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 9 Maret 2017 19.43 (UTC) • Tolong bantu terjemahkan ke bahasa Anda • Get help
Yang penting tidak yatim piatu dulu
Beberapa hari lalu, saya menyelesaikan proyek pribadi perintisan dan pengembangan artikel Miss Perancis yang pranala merahnya cukup banyak. Satu persatu, paranala merah itu saya birukan. Beruntung jika saya mendapatkan artikel yang cukup memadai, jadi saya tidak merasa bersalah. Sayangnya, di antara pranala merah yang saya birukan tersebut ada artikel dalam bahasa Inggris yang (bahkan) referensi dan pranala luarnya pun tidak ada, alias sangat tidak memenuhi kriteria kelayakan. Akhirnya, untuk mengapologikan keberadaan artikel tersebut, saya melakukan beberapa langkah yaitu berusaha agar artikel tersebut tidak yatim sama sekali. Di situ saya masukkan pranala wiki yang terkait dengan artikel lain (yang tentu saja sudah biru). Langkah selanjutnya, saat saya hendak menyimpan artikel terjemahan tersebut, saya menuliskan summary "yang penting tidak yatim dulu, lainnya menyusul". Yang penting semua pranala merah sudah biru semua.
Pertanyaan saya, apakah langkah saya ini dapat dibenarkan menurut kebijakan komunitas atau lebih baik menghapus pranala merah menjadi teks biasa agar artikel tidak dibebani oleh pranala merah. Lantas bagaiman dengan nasib artikel yang (bahkan) referensi dan pranala luarnya pun tidak ada tersebut? Sedangkan saya belum berhasil menemukan sumber terpercaya atas artikel itu. Terima kasih gigho (bicara) 21 Maret 2017 - 21.10 WIB
Please accept our apologies for cross-posting this message. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.
On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, I am pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections.
The Board of Trustees (Board) is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long-term sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. More information about this role can be found on Meta-Wiki. Please read the letter from the Board of Trustees calling for candidates.
The candidacy submission phase will last from April 7 (00:00 UTC) to April 20 (23:59 UTC).
We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates from April 7 to April 20. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki.
Once the questions submission period has ended on April 20, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to beginning on April 21.
The goal of this process is to fill the three community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. The election results will be used by the Board itself to select its new members.
The full schedule for the Board elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.
- April 7 (00:00 UTC) – April 20 (23:59 UTC) – Board nominations
- April 7 – April 20 – Board candidates questions submission period
- April 21 – April 30 – Board candidates answer questions
- May 1 – May 14 – Board voting period
- May 15–19 – Board vote checking
- May 20 – Board result announcement goal
In addition to the Board elections, we will also soon be holding elections for the following roles:
- Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
- There are five positions being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.
- Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson (Ombuds)
- One position is being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.
Please note that this year the Board of Trustees elections will be held before the FDC and Ombuds elections. Candidates who are not elected to the Board are explicitly permitted and encouraged to submit themselves as candidates to the FDC or Ombuds positions after the results of the Board elections are announced.
More information on this year's elections can be found on Meta-Wiki. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the election talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-elections
wikimedia.org.
On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation
Mohon izin mewakili pengurus
Sepeprti saya usulkan beberapa waktu lalu, hari ini saya memberitahukan kepada pengurus, sekaligus mohon izin mewakili pengurus telah menutup (menolak) permohonan hak editor melalui pertimbangan dua pemeriksaan, dari saya dan Bagas Chrisara. Tujuan saya cuma untuk meringankan kerja pengurus, yaitu menolak permohonan tanpa campur tangan pengurus, tetap dengan merujuk kepada hikmat dan pertimbangan matang atas syarat yang melekat pada diri pemohon. Demikian, semoga para pengurus tidak merasa saya telah melangkahi. Terima kasih. Salam gigho (bicara) 3 Mei 2017 - 14.43 WIB
Prototype for editing Wikidata infoboxes on Wikipedia
Hello,
I’m sorry for writing in English. It’d be great if someone could translate this message if necessary.
One of the most requested features for Wikidata is to enable editing of Wikidata’s data directly from Wikipedia, so the editors can continue their workflow without switching websites.
The Wikidata development team has been working on a tool to achieve this goal: fill and edit the Wikipedia infoboxes with information from Wikidata, directly on Wikipedia, via the Visual Editor.
We already asked for feedback in 2015, and collected some interesting ideas which we shared with you in this thesis. Now we would like to present to you our first prototype and collect your feedback, in order to improve and continue the development of this feature.
We present this work to you very early, so we can include your feedback before and all along the development. You are the core users of this feature, so we want to make sure that it fits your needs and editing processes.
You will find the prototype, description of the features, and a demo video, on this page. Feel free to add any comment or feedback on the talk page. The page is currently not translated in every languages, but you can add your contribution by helping to translate it.
Unfortunately, I won’t be able to follow all the discussions on Wikipedia, so if you want to be sure that your feedback is read, please add it on the Wikidata page, in your favorite language. Thanks for your understanding.
Thanks, Lea Lacroix (WMDE)
Discussion on synced reading lists
Discussion on synced reading lists
Hello,
.png)
To create Reading Lists, app users will register an account and marked pages will be tied to that account. Reading List account preferences sync between devices. You can read the same pages on different mobile platforms (tablets, phones). This is the first time we are syncing preference data between devices in such a way. We want to hear and address concerns about privacy and data security. We also want to explain why the current watchlist system is not being adapted for this purpose.
Background
In 2016 the Android team replaced the simple Saved Pages feature with Reading Lists. Reading Lists allow users to bookmark pages into folders and for reading offline. The intent of this feature was to allow "syncing" of these lists for users with many devices. Due to overlap with the Gather feature and related community concerns, this part was put on hold.
The Android team has identified this lack of synching as a major area of complaint from users. They expect lists to sync. The iOS team has held off implementing Reading Lists, as syncing was seen as a "must have" for this feature. A recent technical RfC has allowed these user stories and needs to be unblocked. Initially for Android, then iOS, and with web to potentially follow.
Reading lists are private, stored as part of a user's account, not as a public wiki page. There is no sharing or publishing ability for reading lists. No planned work to make these public. The target audience are people that read Wikipedia and want to bookmark and organize that content in the app. There is a potential for the feature to be available on the web in the future.
Why not watchlists
Watchlists offer similar functionality to Reading Lists. The Reading Infrastructure team evaluated watchlist infrastructure before exploring other options. In general, the needs of watchlists differ from Reading Lists in a few key ways:
- Reading lists focus on Reading articles, not the monitoring of changes.
- Watchlists are focused on monitoring changes of pages/revisions.
- The Watchlist infrastructure is key to our contributor community for monitoring content changes manually and through the use of automated tools (bots). Because of these needs, expanding the scope of Watchlists to reading purposes will only make the project harder to maintain and add more constraints.
- By keeping the projects separate it is easier to scale resources. We can serve these two different audiences and prioritize the work accordingly. Reading Lists are, by their nature, less critical to the health of Wikipedia/MediaWiki.
- Multi-project support. Reading Lists are by design cross-wiki/project. Watchlists are tied to specific wikis. While there have been many discussion for making them cross-wiki, resolution is not in the near term.
More information can be found on MediaWiki.org where feedback and ideas are welcome.
Thank you
Wikimedia Movement Strategy phase 2, and a goodbye
Hai,
As phase one of the Wikimedia movement strategy process nears its close with the strategic direction being finalized, my contractor role as a coordinator is ending too. I am returning to my normal role as a volunteer (Tar Lócesilion) and wanted to thank you all for your participation in the process.
The strategic direction should be finalized on Meta late this weekend. The planning and designing of phase 2 of the strategy process will start in November. The next phase will again offer many opportunities to participate and discuss the future of our movement, and will focus on roles, resources, and responsibilities.
Terimakasih, SGrabarczuk (WMF) (bicara) 30 September 2017 21.32 (UTC)